| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P356 | DOI | 10.1002/JSO.23637 |
| P698 | PubMed publication ID | 24891305 |
| P2093 | author name string | Kristopher Attwood | |
| Steven N Hochwald | |||
| Steven J Nurkin | |||
| Moshim Kukar | |||
| Venkata R Kakarla | |||
| Soni Chousleb | |||
| Wesley A Papenfuss | |||
| P2860 | cites work | Two thousand transhiatal esophagectomies: changing trends, lessons learned. | Q36918601 |
| Transhiatal versus transthoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer | Q37779057 | ||
| Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial | Q42646554 | ||
| Technique of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy with intrathoracic stapled side-to-side anastomosis | Q45153746 | ||
| Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the mid/distal esophagus: five-year survival of a randomized clinical trial | Q45172897 | ||
| The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma continues to rise: analysis of period and birth cohort effects on recent trends | Q47322343 | ||
| Minimally invasive esophagectomy with cervical esophagogastric anastomosis. | Q50948054 | ||
| Minimally invasive esophagectomy is safe and effective following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy. | Q51872443 | ||
| Cancer statistics, 2013 | Q27860762 | ||
| Traditional invasive vs. minimally invasive esophagectomy: a multi-center, randomized trial (TIME-trial). | Q33791252 | ||
| Cervical or thoracic anastomosis after esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis | Q33811607 | ||
| Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients | Q33920466 | ||
| P433 | issue | 3 | |
| P921 | main subject | esophageal cancer | Q372701 |
| P304 | page(s) | 298-301 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2014-05-29 | |
| P1433 | published in | Journal of Surgical Oncology | Q1919535 |
| P1476 | title | Transhiatal versus transthoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a 2005-2011 NSQIP comparison of modern multicenter results | |
| P478 | volume | 110 |
| Q36666629 | Drain amylase aids detection of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy. |
| Q38817049 | Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Utilizing a Stapled Side-to-Side Anastomosis is Safe in the Western Patient Population |
| Q92486911 | Open surgical treatment for esophageal cancer: transhiatal vs. transthoracic, does it really matter? |
| Q92425133 | Recent advances in defining and benchmarking complications after esophagectomy |
| Q47993967 | Risk factors and consequences of anastomotic leakage after Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy†. |
| Q54957063 | Robotic surgery for esophageal cancer: Merits and demerits. |
| Q40218674 | Surgical Apgar score (SAS) predicts perioperative morbidity, mortality, and length of stay in patients undergoing esophagectomy at a high-volume center. |
| Q36332261 | Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for esophageal adenocarcinoma of the lower esophagus: A value-based comparison |
Search more.