Delivering colonoscopy screening for low-income populations in Suffolk County: strategies, outcomes, and benchmarks

scientific article published in August 2013

Delivering colonoscopy screening for low-income populations in Suffolk County: strategies, outcomes, and benchmarks is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1002/CNCR.28160
P698PubMed publication ID23868478

P2093author name stringJoseph C Anderson
Dorothy S Lane
Catherine R Messina
Mary F Cavanagh
P2860cites workScreening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of RadiologyQ28271671
Prevalence of colon polyps detected by colonoscopy screening in asymptomatic black and white patientsQ28660900
Standardized colonoscopy reporting and data system: report of the Quality Assurance Task Group of the National Colorectal Cancer RoundtableQ31110735
What is most important to patients when deciding about colorectal screening?Q33898674
Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal CancerQ34136658
The quality of colonoscopy services--responsibilities of referring clinicians: a consensus statement of the Quality Assurance Task Group, National Colorectal Cancer RoundtableQ34164221
American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancerQ34507813
Quality indicators for colonoscopyQ34517049
Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer SocietyQ34525431
Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopyQ34590728
Screening for colorectal cancer: recommendation and rationaleQ34740712
Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statementQ34847160
Assessing screening quality in the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration ProgramQ35775961
Racial differences in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality in the Women's Health InitiativeQ37201973
Colorectal cancer screening by primary care physicians: recommendations and practices, 2006-2007.Q37307438
Trends in colorectal cancer test use in the medicare population, 1998-2005.Q37473924
National Institutes of Health state-of-the-science conference statement: Enhancing use and quality of colorectal cancer screeningQ37730283
Clinical case management and navigation for colonoscopy screening in an academic medical centerQ38122645
The presence of large serrated polyps increases risk for colorectal cancerQ43566822
Factors associated with racial/ethnic differences in colorectal cancer screening.Q51122197
An academic medical center model for community colorectal cancer screening: the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention demonstration program experience.Q51771822
A provider intervention to improve colorectal cancer screening in county health centers.Q51869956
A comparison of colonoscopy and double-contrast barium enema for surveillance after polypectomy. National Polyp Study Work GroupQ73893847
Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findingsQ74016710
Colonoscopy in colorectal-cancer screening for detection of advanced neoplasiaQ79323298
Are physicians doing too much colonoscopy? A national survey of colorectal surveillance after polypectomyQ80458384
Proximal and large hyperplastic and nondysplastic serrated polyps detected by colonoscopy are associated with neoplasiaQ84571381
Serrated adenomasQ84573079
Surveillance Guidelines Should Be Updated to Recognize the Importance of Serrated PolypsQ85102409
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P921main subjectcolonoscopyQ840387
P304page(s)2842-2848
P577publication date2013-08-01
P1433published inCancerQ326041
P1476titleDelivering colonoscopy screening for low-income populations in Suffolk County: strategies, outcomes, and benchmarks
P478volume119 Suppl 15