| editorial | Q871232 |
| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P50 | author | Kutluk Oktay | Q106870768 |
| P2093 | author name string | Norbert Gleicher | |
| David H Barad | |||
| P2860 | cites work | Multiple births: how are we doing? | Q44891746 |
| Cumulative pregnancy rates after a maximum of nine cycles of modified natural cycle IVF and analysis of patient drop-out: a cohort study | Q48788852 | ||
| Cumulative pregnancy rates after three cycles of minimal stimulation IVF and results according to subfertility diagnosis: a multicentre cohort study. | Q50648367 | ||
| A formal comparison of the practice of assisted reproductive technologies between Europe and the USA. | Q50649433 | ||
| The impact of LH-containing gonadotropins on diploidy rates in preimplantation embryos: long protocol stimulation. | Q51720336 | ||
| Safety issues in assisted reproduction technology. A rebuttal. | Q53376958 | ||
| Preimplantation genetic diagnosis as both a therapeutic and diagnostic tool in assisted reproductive technology | Q57779321 | ||
| Reducing the Risk of Multiple Births by Transfer of Two Embryos after in Vitro Fertilization | Q58133895 | ||
| In Vitro Fertilization with Preimplantation Genetic Screening | Q59782826 | ||
| Preimplantation aneuploidy screening: a research tool for now | Q80207395 | ||
| Patient-friendly IVF: how should it be defined? | Q80366758 | ||
| Preimplantation genetic screening: "established" and ready for prime time? | Q80915650 | ||
| In unselected patients, elective single embryo transfer prevents all multiples, but results in significantly lower pregnancy rates compared with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial | Q81411091 | ||
| Elective single embryo transfer versus double embryo transfer in assisted reproduction | Q81616497 | ||
| The relative myth of elective single embryo transfer | Q82635263 | ||
| Guidelines on the number of embryos transferred | Q94387869 | ||
| Update on the comparison of assisted reproduction outcomes between Europe and the USA: the 2002 data | Q31108569 | ||
| IVF with preimplantation genetic screening, a promising new treatment with unexpectedly negative health outcomes: the Hippocratic role of Data Monitoring Committees | Q31137317 | ||
| Progress we can be proud of: U.S. trends in assisted reproduction over the first 20 years | Q34157481 | ||
| Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in couples with advanced maternal age: a prospective randomized controlled trial. | Q34357019 | ||
| Safety issues in assisted reproduction technology: the children of assisted reproduction confront the responsible conduct of assisted reproductive technologies | Q35011438 | ||
| Number of embryos for transfer after IVF and ICSI: a Cochrane review | Q36267867 | ||
| Natural IVF cycles may be desirable for women with repeated failures by stimulated IVF cycles | Q36970150 | ||
| Preimplantation genetic testing: a Practice Committee opinion | Q36975085 | ||
| Single embryo transfer: the role of natural cycle/minimal stimulation IVF in the future | Q40212162 | ||
| Single versus double embryo transfer: cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a randomized clinical trial | Q43839304 | ||
| P433 | issue | 5 | |
| P304 | page(s) | 599-602 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2009-05-01 | |
| P1433 | published in | Reproductive BioMedicine Online | Q15762964 |
| P1476 | title | Patients are entitled to maximal IVF pregnancy rates | |
| P478 | volume | 18 |
Search more.