Cost-effectiveness of atazanavir/ritonavir compared with lopinavir/ritonavir in treatment-naïve human immunodeficiency virus-1 patients in Sweden

scientific article published on 13 January 2011

Cost-effectiveness of atazanavir/ritonavir compared with lopinavir/ritonavir in treatment-naïve human immunodeficiency virus-1 patients in Sweden is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.3109/00365548.2010.545835
P698PubMed publication ID21231811

P50authorAljoscha NeubauerQ15448621
Benedicte LescrauwaetQ47159095
P2093author name stringBenedicte Lescrauwaet
Annette Alaeus
Karin Sennfält
Bart Heeg
Per-Olof Thuresson
P2860cites workLife expectancy of individuals on combination antiretroviral therapy in high-income countries: a collaborative analysis of 14 cohort studiesQ24597052
Long-term clopidogrel therapy in patients receiving percutaneous coronary interventionQ28221041
Efficacy and safety of darunavir-ritonavir compared with that of lopinavir-ritonavir at 48 weeks in treatment-experienced, HIV-infected patients in TITAN: a randomised controlled phase III trialQ34647153
Grade 4 Events Are as Important as AIDS Events in the Era of HAARTQ47386956
Costs of coronary heart disease and stroke: the case of Sweden.Q50650715
The societal burden of HIV/AIDS in Northern Italy: an analysis of costs and quality of life.Q51116356
The use of the Framingham equation to predict myocardial infarctions in HIV-infected patients: comparison with observed events in the D:A:D Study.Q51943315
Cardiovascular disease risk profiles.Q52461317
Mortality in the highly active antiretroviral therapy era: changing causes of death and disease in the HIV outpatient study.Q53608173
British HIV Association guidelines for the treatment of HIV-1-infected adults with antiretroviral therapy 2008Q57180178
Treatment of HIV infection: Swedish recommendations 2009.Q37634509
Insights into the reasons for discontinuation of the first highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimen in a cohort of antiretroviral naïve patients. I.CO.N.A. Study Group. Italian Cohort of Antiretroviral-Naïve PatientsQ38959219
Once-daily atazanavir/ritonavir compared with twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir, each in combination with tenofovir and emtricitabine, for management of antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected patients: 96-week efficacy and safety results of the CASTLE stQ43208808
Utility assessments of opioid treatment for chronic painQ44345216
Cost-effectiveness analysis of lopinavir/ritonavir and atazanavir+ritonavir regimens in the CASTLE studyQ46121151
Efficacy and safety of once-daily darunavir/ritonavir versus lopinavir/ritonavir in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients at week 48.Q46492574
96-week comparison of once-daily atazanavir/ritonavir and twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir in patients with multiple virologic failuresQ46973541
Does a statistically significant survival benefit of erlotinib plus gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer translate into clinical significance and value?Q46974051
P433issue4
P921main subjectSwedenQ34
atazanavirQ423467
lopinavir/ritonavirQ3836750
lopinavirQ422585
ritonavirQ422618
atazanavir/ritonavirQ39053473
P304page(s)304-312
P577publication date2011-01-13
P1433published inInfectious DiseasesQ7429961
P1476titleCost-effectiveness of atazanavir/ritonavir compared with lopinavir/ritonavir in treatment-naïve human immunodeficiency virus-1 patients in Sweden
P478volume43