| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P6179 | Dimensions Publication ID | 1007831947 |
| P356 | DOI | 10.1007/S11136-013-0493-7 |
| P698 | PubMed publication ID | 23943258 |
| P50 | author | Christine Miaskowski | Q61448594 |
| P2093 | author name string | Mark S Litwin | |
| Peter R Carroll | |||
| Jeanette M Broering | |||
| Leslie S Wilson | |||
| Alan Paciorek | |||
| P2860 | cites work | The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) | Q26778425 |
| Cancer statistics, 2012 | Q27860574 | ||
| Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality | Q28248452 | ||
| Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance | Q29615569 | ||
| Automated collection of quality-of-life data: a comparison of paper and computer touch-screen questionnaires | Q30559421 | ||
| Electronic collection of health-related quality of life data: validity, time benefits, and patient preference | Q30658672 | ||
| Improving health care efficiency and quality using tablet personal computers to collect research-quality, patient-reported data | Q33365415 | ||
| Efficacy of data capture for patient-reported toxicity following radiotherapy for prostate or cervical cancer | Q33519828 | ||
| The equivalence of computerized and paper-and-pencil psychological instruments: implications for measures of negative affect | Q33737953 | ||
| Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation | Q34193483 | ||
| Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a meta-analytic review | Q34766450 | ||
| Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report | Q35011969 | ||
| Responsiveness and minimal important differences for patient reported outcomes | Q35062340 | ||
| The FDA guidance for industry on PROs: the point of view of a pharmaceutical company | Q35129599 | ||
| Evaluation of an online platform for cancer patient self-reporting of chemotherapy toxicities | Q36463131 | ||
| The clinical significance of quality of life assessments in oncology: a summary for clinicians | Q36516476 | ||
| Cancer outcomes measurement: Through the lens of the Medical Outcomes Trust framework | Q36647861 | ||
| The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups | Q36759493 | ||
| Half standard deviation estimate of the minimally important difference in HRQOL scores? | Q37609367 | ||
| Computer anxiety: a comparison of pen-based personal digital assistants, conventional computer and paper assessment of mood and performance | Q39482261 | ||
| The CaPSURE database: a methodology for clinical practice and research in prostate cancer. CaPSURE Research Panel. Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor. | Q45960937 | ||
| The MOS short-form general health survey. Reliability and validity in a patient population | Q46080503 | ||
| The UCLA Prostate Cancer Index: development, reliability, and validity of a health-related quality of life measure | Q46519221 | ||
| The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. | Q52037688 | ||
| Quality-of-life outcomes in men treated for localized prostate cancer. | Q53649469 | ||
| The RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0. | Q53676093 | ||
| Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. | Q55067996 | ||
| Use of tablet personal computers for sensitive patient-reported information | Q62023553 | ||
| Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: applications to assessment of adaptive behavior | Q71025512 | ||
| A comparison of an electronic version of the SF-36 General Health Questionnaire to the standard paper version | Q74062034 | ||
| Design effects in the transition to web-based surveys | Q80233663 | ||
| P433 | issue | 2 | |
| P921 | main subject | quality of life | Q13100823 |
| P304 | page(s) | 495-508 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2013-08-13 | |
| P1433 | published in | Quality of Life Research | Q15749950 |
| P1476 | title | Measurement equivalence using a mixed-mode approach to administer health-related quality of life instruments. | |
| P478 | volume | 23 |
| Q55250364 | A meta-analytic review of measurement equivalence study findings of the SF-36® and SF-12® Health Surveys across electronic modes compared to paper administration. |
| Q34136485 | Assessing quality of life in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic and standardized comparison of available instruments |
| Q38673035 | Basic issues concerning health-related quality of life |
| Q35877306 | Evaluation of electronic patient-reported outcome assessment with cancer patients in the hospital and at home |
| Q55422416 | Measurement agreement of the self-administered questionnaire of the Belgian Health Interview Survey: Paper-and-pencil versus web-based mode. |
| Q53273552 | Mode Equivalence of Health Indicators Between Data Collection Modes and Mixed-Mode Survey Designs in Population-Based Health Interview Surveys for Children and Adolescents: Methodological Study. |
| Q30234561 | Quality of Life Measurements: Any Value for Clinical Practice? |
| Q38688846 | Socially Desirable Responding in Web-Based Questionnaires: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Candor Hypothesis |
| Q56545423 | The Swedish RAND-36 Health Survey - reliability and responsiveness assessed in patient populations using Svensson's method for paired ordinal data |
| Q35934802 | The use of self-report questions to examine the prevalence of musculoskeletal problems: a test-retest study. |
Search more.