Evidence-based classification of recommendations on use of genomic tests in clinical practice: dealing with insufficient evidence

scientific article

Evidence-based classification of recommendations on use of genomic tests in clinical practice: dealing with insufficient evidence is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814
editorialQ871232

External links are
P6179Dimensions Publication ID1035476303
P356DOI10.1097/GIM.0B013E3181F9AD55
P698PubMed publication ID20975567
P5875ResearchGate publication ID47544959

P50authorMuin J. KhouryQ64746271
Ralph J. CoatesQ124654554
P2093author name stringJames P Evans
P2860cites workLetting the genome out of the bottle--will we get our wish?Q28264215
Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statementQ28265041
The rules remain the same for genomic medicine: the case against "reverse genetic exceptionalism".Q34121303
Screening for hemochromatosis: recommendation statementQ34552980
Shared decision making about screening and chemoprevention. a suggested approach from the U.S. Preventive Services Task ForceQ35618841
Promoting informed decisions about cancer screening in communities and healthcare systemsQ35618847
Recommendations from the EGAPP Working Group: testing for cytochrome P450 polymorphisms in adults with nonpsychotic depression treated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitorsQ37037058
The Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP) Initiative: methods of the EGAPP Working GroupQ37277889
Recommendations from the EGAPP Working Group: can UGT1A1 genotyping reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with irinotecan?Q37345971
Recommendations from the EGAPP Working Group: genetic testing strategies in newly diagnosed individuals with colorectal cancer aimed at reducing morbidity and mortality from Lynch syndrome in relativesQ37345978
Recommendations from the EGAPP Working Group: can tumor gene expression profiling improve outcomes in patients with breast cancer?Q37345983
Comparative effectiveness research and genomic medicine: an evolving partnership for 21st century medicineQ37596937
The evolving role of prevention in health care: contributions of the U.S. Preventive Services Task ForceQ40713088
The evidence dilemma in genomic medicine.Q50769689
P433issue11
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P304page(s)680-683
P577publication date2010-11-01
P1433published inGenetics in MedicineQ15765508
P1476titleEvidence-based classification of recommendations on use of genomic tests in clinical practice: dealing with insufficient evidence
P478volume12

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q31000681A conceptual model for translating omic data into clinical action
Q57263696A critical view of the general public’s awareness and physicians’ opinion of the trends and potential pitfalls of genetic testing in Greece
Q50137319Adherence to Recommended Risk Management among Unaffected Women with a BRCA Mutation
Q37086591Adopting orphans: comprehensive genetic testing of Mendelian diseases of childhood by next-generation sequencing
Q57697028Are health technology assessments of pharmacogenetic tests feasible? A case study ofCYP2D6testing in the treatment of breast cancer with tamoxifen
Q48503018Assessing the readiness of precision medicine interoperabilty: An exploratory study of the National Institutes of Health genetic testing registry
Q94595312Challenges in returning results in a genomic medicine implementation study: the Return of Actionable Variants Empirical (RAVE) study
Q27022338Collaborative cancer epidemiology in the 21st century: the model of cancer consortia
Q38424242Current priorities for public health practice in addressing the role of human genomics in improving population health
Q46486965EXAMINING EVIDENCE IN U.S. PAYER COVERAGE POLICIES FOR MULTI-GENE PANELS AND SEQUENCING TESTS.
Q34451291Evaluating genomic tests from bench to bedside: a practical framework
Q36318310Family history intake: a challenge to personalized approaches in health promotion and disease prevention
Q64107539Healthcare System Priorities for Successful Integration of Genomics: An Australian Focus
Q50106856How is genetic testing evaluated? A systematic review of the literature.
Q39234236Implementation of an electronic genomic and family health history tool in primary prenatal care.
Q28729140Implications of Internet availability of genomic information for public health practice
Q38239811Managing the ethical challenges of next-generation sequencing in genomic medicine
Q92526168Moving the Needle on Action Around Evidence-Based Screening for Hereditary Conditions: Preparing State Chronic Disease Directors to Advance Precision Public Health
Q37716310Payer decision making for next-generation sequencing-based genetic tests: insights from cell-free DNA prenatal screening.
Q34938911Personalizing health care: feasibility and future implications
Q38248763Pharmacogenetic approaches in the treatment of alcohol use disorders: addressing clinical utility and implementation thresholds
Q34343365Pharmacogenetics in clinical practice: how far have we come and where are we going?
Q33910107Pharmacogenomic knowledge gaps and educational resource needs among physicians in selected specialties.
Q34280025Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine in neuropsychiatry
Q36541027Prediction of Cancer Prevention: From Mammogram Screening to Identification of BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers in Underserved Populations
Q36398661Prioritizing genomic applications for action by level of evidence: a horizon-scanning method
Q44981166Stakeholder perspectives on decision-analytic modeling frameworks to assess genetic services policy
Q38129303Storing and interpreting genomic information in widely deployed electronic health record systems
Q64118275The Healthcare Systems Research Network (HCSRN) as an Environment for Dissemination and Implementation Research: A Case Study of Developing a Multi-Site Research Study in Precision Medicine
Q39560565The effects of learning about one's own genetic susceptibility to alcoholism: a randomized experiment.
Q36157315When is Genomic Testing Cost-Effective? Testing for Lynch Syndrome in Patients with Newly-Diagnosed Colorectal Cancer and Their Relatives
Q37507366Which BRCA genetic testing programs are ready for implementation in health care? A systematic review of economic evaluations
Q26798243Which factors may determine the necessary and feasible type of effectiveness evidence? A mixed methods approach to develop an instrument to help coverage decision-makers
Q35627358You never call, you never write: why return of 'omic' results to research participants is both a good idea and a moral imperative

Search more.