scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P356 | DOI | 10.1016/S0020-7292(96)02805-6 |
P698 | PubMed publication ID | 9061387 |
P2093 | author name string | M K Toppozada | |
H A Hassan | |||
M Y Anwar | |||
W S el-Gazaerly | |||
P2860 | cites work | The Brazilian experience with Cytotec | Q34343040 |
Uterine contractility and induction of abortion in early pregnancy by misoprostol and mifepristone | Q43697274 | ||
The clandestine epidemic: the practice of unsafe abortion in Latin America | Q46365826 | ||
Selling abortifacients over the counter in pharmacies in Fortaleza, Brazil | Q68307069 | ||
The abortifacient effect of misoprostol in the second trimester. A randomized comparison with gemeprost in patients pre-treated with mifepristone (RU486) | Q72755939 | ||
Intravaginal misoprostol as a cervical ripening agent | Q72919110 | ||
P433 | issue | 2 | |
P921 | main subject | misoprostol | Q416025 |
P304 | page(s) | 135-139 | |
P577 | publication date | 1997-02-01 | |
P1433 | published in | International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Q15746544 |
P1476 | title | Oral or vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor | |
P478 | volume | 56 |
Q34757705 | A benefit-risk assessment of misoprostol for cervical ripening and labour induction |
Q44269683 | A comparison of 100 microg oral misoprostol every 3 hours and 6 hours for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. |
Q45252593 | A comparison of labor induction by oral and vaginal misoprostol. |
Q43561554 | A comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol tablets in induction of labour at term |
Q41665373 | A comparison of orally administered misoprostol with vaginally administered misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction |
Q73182512 | A randomized comparison of oral misoprostol versus Foley catheter and oxytocin for induction of labor at term |
Q43764360 | A study of intravaginal misoprostol for induction of labor in toxemia of pregnancy |
Q44575596 | Early medical termination pregnancy with methotrexate and misoprostol in lower segment cesarean section cases |
Q35217881 | Induction of labour with a favourable cervix and/or pre-labour rupture of membranes |
Q33716300 | Labor induction with misoprostol |
Q35911959 | Labour induction with randomized comparison of oral and intravaginal misoprostol in post date multigravida women. |
Q46357203 | Medication use during the perinatal period. |
Q39265951 | Misoprostol treatment for early pregnancy failure does not impair future fertility |
Q43673819 | Misoprostol versus dinoprostone for cervical priming prior to induction of labour in term pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial |
Q45266615 | Off-label use of misoprostol in obstetrics: a cautionary tale |
Q38839296 | Oral Misoprostol Solution for Induction of Labour |
Q24194006 | Oral misoprostol for induction of labour |
Q24246291 | Oral misoprostol for induction of labour |
Q32065275 | Oral misoprostol vs. placebo in the management of prelabor rupture of membranes at term |
Q33221950 | Oral, vaginal and sublingual misoprostol for induction of labor |
Q42659911 | Titrated oral misoprostol solution for induction of labour: a multi-centre, randomised trial |
Q45252585 | Use of misoprostol on an outpatient basis for postdate pregnancy |
Q24234483 | Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour |
Q24250296 | Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour |
Q43516615 | Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor: 25 vs. 50 microg dose regimen |
Search more.