Systematic bias introduced by the informed consent process in a diagnostic research study

scientific article published in March 2008

Systematic bias introduced by the informed consent process in a diagnostic research study is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1111/J.1553-2712.2008.00066.X
P698PubMed publication ID18304052
P5875ResearchGate publication ID5548553

P50authorJeffrey A. KlineQ90429391
Alice M. MitchellQ93818746
P2860cites workPotential impact of the HIPAA privacy rule on data collection in a registry of patients with acute coronary syndromeQ30990472
Bias from requiring explicit consent from all participants in observational research: prospective, population based studyQ34089780
Institutional variability in a minimal risk, population-based study: recognizing policy barriers to health services researchQ34337572
Research without consent: current status, 2003.Q35547732
Passive consent for clinical research in the age of HIPAA.Q35688279
Conducting research using the emergency exception from informed consent: the Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) Trial experience.Q35744549
Health Insurance Portability Accountability Act (HIPAA) regulations: effect on medical record researchQ35786532
Risk in emergency research using a waiver of/exception from consent: implications of a structured approach for institutional review board reviewQ36258620
Electronic medical record review as a surrogate to telephone follow-up to establish outcome for diagnostic research studies in the emergency departmentQ36258624
Research conditions that qualify for emergency exception from informed consent.Q36303581
A qualitative study of institutional review board members' experience reviewing research proposals using emergency exception from informed consentQ36807069
Waiver of informed consent: a survey of emergency medicine patientsQ39459723
Contribution of indirect computed tomography venography to computed tomography angiography of the chest for the diagnosis of thromboembolic disease in two United States emergency departmentsQ39655389
Public perception of emergency research: a questionnaireQ40368755
Distrust, race, and researchQ46863840
Factors that influence African-Americans' willingness to participate in medical research studiesQ46941182
Impracticability of informed consent in the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network.Q51941819
The Role of Community Consultation in the Ethical Conduct of Research Without ConsentQ57988501
P433issue3
P921main subjectbiasQ742736
informed consentQ764527
P304page(s)225-230
P577publication date2008-03-01
P1433published inAcademic Emergency MedicineQ15755260
P1476titleSystematic bias introduced by the informed consent process in a diagnostic research study
P478volume15

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q34671655Antenatal consent in the SUPPORT trial: challenges, costs, and representative enrollment
Q35830720Coordination and management of multicenter clinical studies in trauma: Experience from the PRospective Observational Multicenter Major Trauma Transfusion (PROMMTT) Study
Q46327419Immediate complications of intravenous contrast for computed tomography imaging in the outpatient setting are rare
Q33571334Incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy after contrast-enhanced computed tomography in the outpatient setting
Q34758206Prospective multicenter evaluation of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria
Q37721123Prospective study of the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy among patients evaluated for pulmonary embolism by contrast-enhanced computed tomography
Q43939070The effect of informed consent on results of a standard upper extremity intake questionnaire.
Q58656949The ethics of uninsured participants accessing healthcare in biomedical research: A literature review
Q33666469The use of delayed telephone informed consent for observational emergency medicine research is ethical and effective
Q37096905Waiver of consent in noninterventional, observational emergency research: the PROMMTT experience

Search more.