scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P356 | DOI | 10.1515/CCLM.2010.001 |
P698 | PubMed publication ID | 19922240 |
P2093 | author name string | Mario Plebani | |
Greg Cooper | |||
Ferruccio Ceriotti | |||
David Burnett | |||
Curtis Parvin | |||
James Westgard | |||
P2860 | cites work | Internal quality control: planning and implementation strategies | Q35589605 |
Inherent biological variation and reference values | Q35870177 | ||
Laboratory network of excellence: enhancing patient safety and service effectiveness | Q42680304 | ||
Test result variation and the quality of evidence-based clinical guidelines | Q44964265 | ||
Quality specifications in EQA schemes: from theory to practice | Q44964278 | ||
The Guide to expression of uncertainty in measurement approach for estimating uncertainty: an appraisal | Q47423934 | ||
Critique of the Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement method of estimating and reporting uncertainty in diagnostic assays | Q47423946 | ||
News from the BIPM | Q56779478 | ||
P433 | issue | 1 | |
P407 | language of work or name | English | Q1860 |
P921 | main subject | quality control | Q827792 |
P304 | page(s) | 41-52 | |
P577 | publication date | 2010-01-01 | |
P1433 | published in | Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine | Q5133754 |
P1476 | title | Collective opinion paper on findings of the 2009 convocation of experts on quality control | |
P478 | volume | 48 |
Q38849737 | Application of Sigma Metrics and Performance Comparison Between Two Biochemistry Analyser and a Blood Gas Analyser for the Determination of Electrolytes |
Q55692875 | Application of Sigma metrics in assessing the clinical performance of verified versus non-verified reagents for routine biochemical analytes. |
Q44740638 | Collective opinion paper on findings of the 2010 convocation of experts on laboratory quality |
Q90328007 | Comparison between Sigma metrics in four accredited Egyptian medical laboratories in some biochemical tests: an initiative towards sigma calculation harmonization |
Q50788760 | Comparison of the results from two different External Quality Assessment Schemes supports the utility of robust quality specifications. |
Q30844641 | Determination of quality control limits for serological infectious disease testing using historical data |
Q37957388 | Direct-to-consumer testing: more risks than opportunities |
Q53081038 | Do new concepts for deriving permissible limits for analytical imprecision and bias have any advantages over existing consensus? |
Q38145040 | Internal quality control: best practice |
Q41347085 | The 1999 Stockholm Consensus Conference on quality specifications in laboratory medicine |
Q57825201 | The quality of the extra-analytical phase of laboratory practice in some developing European countries and Mexico – a multicentric study |