scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P2093 | author name string | Zamzuri Idris | |
Jafri Malin Abdullah | |||
Wong Chung Chek | |||
Tan Boon Beng | |||
Low Yong Lee | |||
Teo Yian Young | |||
Wong Sii Hieng | |||
P2860 | cites work | Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation. | Q51232114 |
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with ipsilateral pedicle screw and contralateral facet screw fixation. | Q51334376 | ||
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): technical feasibility and initial results. | Q51542763 | ||
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with reduction of spondylolisthesis: technique and outcomes after a minimum of 2 years' follow-up. | Q53533540 | ||
The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire | Q66829376 | ||
The North American spine society lumbar spine outcome assessment Instrument: reliability and validity tests | Q71708738 | ||
The paraspinal sacrospinalis-splitting approach to the lumbar spine | Q72104521 | ||
A Historical Cohort Study of Pedicle Screw Fixation in Thoracic, Lumbar, and Sacral Spinal Fusions | Q72398785 | ||
A method of spinal fusion | Q78600402 | ||
The use of pedicle-screw internal fixation for the operative treatment of spinal disorders | Q34073240 | ||
Comparison of one-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2. | Q34337897 | ||
Posterior percutaneous spine instrumentation | Q36726479 | ||
A perioperative cost analysis comparing single-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion | Q38164138 | ||
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF): surgical technique, long-term 4-year prospective outcomes, and complications compared with an open TLIF cohort | Q38202300 | ||
Stabilization of the lower thoracic and lumbar spine with external skeletal fixation. | Q41417763 | ||
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion | Q42218083 | ||
Clinical and radiographic comparison of mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in 42 patients with long-term follow-up | Q42604396 | ||
Percutaneous transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar instability | Q42616580 | ||
Clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion | Q42622765 | ||
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: evaluating initial experience | Q42736875 | ||
Perioperative complications in patients undergoing open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion as a revision surgery | Q45539422 | ||
P275 | copyright license | Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International | Q24082749 |
P6216 | copyright status | copyrighted | Q50423863 |
P433 | issue | 4 | |
P304 | page(s) | 620-637 | |
P577 | publication date | 2017-10-01 | |
P1433 | published in | Asian journal of neurosurgery | Q26842833 |
P1476 | title | Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery Compared to Open Posterior Lumbar Instrumentation and Fusion | |
P478 | volume | 12 |
Q52563133 | Hypericum perforatum to improve post-operative Pain Outcome after monosegmental Spinal microdiscectomy (HYPOS): a study protocol for a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. |
Q91342336 | One Center's Experience with Hybrid Technique for Lumbar Spine Instrumentated Surgeries: Evaluation of Different Instrumentation Systems and Their Management |
Q58591086 | Patient-oriented aesthetic outcome after lumbar spine surgery: a 1-year follow-up prospective observational study comparing minimally invasive and standard open procedures |
Q88758374 | Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for L5S1 Lumbar Disc Herniation Using a Transforaminal Approach Versus an Interlaminar Approach: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
Q91314776 | Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Diskectomy for Axillar Herniation at L5-S1 via the Transforaminal Approach Versus the Interlaminar Approach: A Prospective Clinical Trial |
Q92410496 | Using minimally invasive techniques adds to the value equation for select patients |
Search more.