Single-centre experience with the Impella CP, 5.0 and RP in 109 consecutive patients with profound cardiogenic shock.

scientific article published in November 2017

Single-centre experience with the Impella CP, 5.0 and RP in 109 consecutive patients with profound cardiogenic shock. is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1177/2048872617743194
P698PubMed publication ID29148290

P50authorJacob E MøllerQ63731435
Jordi DahlQ64147264
P2093author name stringLisette Okkels Jensen
Henrik Schmidt
Ole Kristian Møller-Helgestad
Marianne Kjær Jensen
Karsten Tange Veien
Peter Blom Jensen
Sigrun Høegholm Kann
Charlotte Svejstrup Rud
P2860cites work???Q27004454
2015 ACC/AHA/SCAI Focused Update on Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: An Update of the 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and the 2013 ACCF/AHA ...Q26779649
Impella ventricular support in clinical practice: Collaborative viewpoint from a European expert user groupQ26781346
Hemodynamics of Mechanical Circulatory SupportQ28080952
An international randomized trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction. The GUSTO investigatorsQ28254763
A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study GroupQ29614889
Left ventricular support by catheter-mounted axial flow pump reduces infarct sizeQ34188716
Effect of Early Initiation of Mechanical Circulatory Support on Survival in Cardiogenic ShockQ34548379
A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a percutaneous left ventricular assist device versus intra-aortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock caused by myocardial infarctionQ34879663
Temporal trends in incidence and outcomes of peripartum cardiomyopathy in the United States: a nationwide population-based studyQ35022026
Incidence and prognosis of vascular complications after percutaneous placement of left ventricular assist deviceQ38520819
Post-Hospital Outcomes of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock: Findings From the NCDR.Q39985964
Temporal Trends and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions for Cardiogenic Shock in the Setting of Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Report From the CathPCI RegistryQ40955315
Mechanical Pre-Conditioning With Acute Circulatory Support Before Reperfusion Limits Infarct Size in Acute Myocardial InfarctionQ41146319
Predicting survival after ECMO for refractory cardiogenic shock: the survival after veno-arterial-ECMO (SAVE)-scoreQ41701343
Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shockQ42664790
An assessment of the RIFLE criteria for acute renal failure in hospitalized patientsQ44625885
Mechanically unloading the left ventricle before coronary reperfusion reduces left ventricular wall stress and myocardial infarct sizeQ45629251
Do all nonsurvivors of cardiogenic shock die with a low cardiac index?Q47398169
Experience from a randomized controlled trial with Impella 2.5 versus IABP in STEMI patients with cardiogenic pre-shock. Lessons learned from the IMPRESS in STEMI trial.Q50554837
Distal limb perfusion: Achilles' heel in peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.Q51726449
P433issue1
P921main subjectcardiogenic shockQ2477062
P304page(s)53-61
P577publication date2017-11-17
P1433published inEuropean heart journal. Acute cardiovascular careQ26853800
P1476titleSingle-centre experience with the Impella CP, 5.0 and RP in 109 consecutive patients with profound cardiogenic shock
P478volume7

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q90577562Contemporary trends in use of mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute MI and cardiogenic shock
Q64102007Haemodynamic simulation and the effect of early left ventricular unloading in pre-shock acute coronary syndrome
Q90435830Impact of concomitant vasoactive treatment and mechanical left ventricular unloading in a porcine model of profound cardiogenic shock
Q58594989Real-life use of left ventricular circulatory support with Impella in cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction: 12 years AMC experience
Q92143395Temporal trends in incidence and patient characteristics in cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction from 2010 to 2017: a Danish cohort study
Q94463277Two cases of successful treatment of acute right heart failure with Impella RP®

Search more.