Effectiveness and safety of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic hepatectomy for liver neoplasms: A meta-analysis of retrospective studies

scientific article published on 11 September 2017

Effectiveness and safety of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic hepatectomy for liver neoplasms: A meta-analysis of retrospective studies is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814
meta-analysisQ815382

External links are
P356DOI10.1016/J.ASJSUR.2017.07.001
P8608Fatcat IDrelease_d4zfimh6wbgk5evw6lbtydo7b4
P698PubMed publication ID28912048

P2093author name stringKehu Yang
Liang Yao
Xiaofei Li
Tiankang Guo
Lidong Hu
Penghui Jin
P921main subjecthepatectomyQ1514021
P577publication date2017-09-11
P1433published inAsian Journal of SurgeryQ15762346
P1476titleEffectiveness and safety of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic hepatectomy for liver neoplasms: A meta-analysis of retrospective studies

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q64109844International consensus statement on robotic hepatectomy surgery in 2018
Q64935220Minimally invasive liver resection: has the time come to consider robotics a valid assistance?
Q93144283Reply to: The letter to the editor "Laparoscopic liver resection for malignancies confined to Couinaud's segment VII in the robotic surgery era" by Zizzo et al
Q59328909Robotic total meso-rectal excision for rectal cancer: A systematic review following the publication of the ROLARR trial
Q89533684Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a comparative cost-effectiveness study

Search more.