The authors' reply to Koeser and McCrone: "on the use and interpretation of quantile regression in quality-of-life research".

scientific article published in February 2014

The authors' reply to Koeser and McCrone: "on the use and interpretation of quantile regression in quality-of-life research". is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1007/S40273-013-0114-X
P698PubMed publication ID24442831
P5875ResearchGate publication ID259809077

P50authorMichela TinelliQ49624764
Anthony ScottQ51169888
P2093author name stringChristine Bond
Paul McNamee
Mandy Ryan
Janelle Seymour
P2860cites workThe MEDMAN study: a randomized controlled trial of community pharmacy-led medicines management for patients with coronary heart diseaseQ28218666
Systematic review and empirical comparison of contemporaneous EQ-5D and SF-6D group mean scoresQ37945042
On the use and interpretation of quantile regression in quality-of-life researchQ48100832
Valuing benefits to inform a clinical trial in pharmacy : do differences in utility measures at baseline affect the effectiveness of the intervention?Q48315614
The use of quantile regression in health care research: a case study examining gender differences in the timeliness of thrombolytic therapyQ57266878
Shedding new light onto the ceiling and floor? A quantile regression approach to compare EQ-5D and SF-6D responsesQ62384037
P433issue2
P921main subjectquality of lifeQ13100823
P304page(s)229-230
P577publication date2014-02-01
P1433published inPharmacoEconomicsQ7180778
P1476titleThe authors' reply to Koeser and McCrone: "on the use and interpretation of quantile regression in quality-of-life research"
P478volume32