A comparison of radio-frequency biomotion sensors and actigraphy versus polysomnography for the assessment of sleep in normal subjects

scientific article published on 11 March 2014

A comparison of radio-frequency biomotion sensors and actigraphy versus polysomnography for the assessment of sleep in normal subjects is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1007/S11325-014-0967-Z
P698PubMed publication ID24614968
P5875ResearchGate publication ID260683293

P2093author name stringThomas Penzel
Conor Heneghan
Emer O'Hare
Carmen Garcia
David Flanagan
Daniela Frohberg
P2860cites workComparison of sleep parameters from actigraphy and polysomnography in older women: the SOF studyQ28268717
Factors that may influence the classification of sleep-wake by wrist actigraphy: the MrOS Sleep StudyQ35181223
Issues of validity in actigraphic sleep assessmentQ35681197
Wake detection capacity of actigraphy during sleepQ36493203
Movement toward a novel activity monitoring deviceQ44969684
Comparison of actigraphic, polysomnographic, and subjective assessment of sleep parameters in sleep-disordered patientsQ47411358
Wrist-actigraphic estimation of sleep time under nCPAP treatment in sleep apnoea patientsQ47963950
Sleep/wake measurement using a non-contact biomotion sensorQ48345143
Practice parameters for the use of actigraphy in the assessment of sleep and sleep disorders: an update for 2007.Q48468125
A comparison of actigraphy and polysomnography in older adults treated for chronic primary insomniaQ48486709
Actigraphy validation with insomnia.Q48511848
A novel adaptive wrist actigraphy algorithm for sleep-wake assessment in sleep apnea patientsQ48564003
Further validation of actigraphy for sleep studies.Q48633881
Real time breathing rate estimation from a non contact biosensorQ51633127
Why Bland-Altman plots should use X, not (Y+X)/2 when X is a reference method.Q51904904
A comparison of sleep detection by wrist actigraphy, behavioral response, and polysomnographyQ73710517
P433issue1
P304page(s)91-98
P577publication date2014-03-11
P1433published inSleep and BreathingQ15762247
P1476titleA comparison of radio-frequency biomotion sensors and actigraphy versus polysomnography for the assessment of sleep in normal subjects
P478volume19

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q92580558Accuracy of Fitbit Wristbands in Measuring Sleep Stage Transitions and the Effect of User-Specific Factors
Q64054592Consumer Sleep Technologies, Clinical Guidelines, and Evidence-Based Medicine: This is Not a Zero-Sum Game
Q91286682Contactless recording of sleep apnea and periodic leg movements by nocturnal 3-D-video and subsequent visual perceptive computing
Q57819285Dim Light Exposure and Myopia in Children
Q30252075Has adult sleep duration declined over the last 50+ years?
Q28388697Monitoring of Weekly Sleep Pattern Variations at Home with a Contactless Biomotion Sensor
Q52803970New technology to assess sleep apnea: wearables, smartphones, and accessories.
Q90168399Reduced sleep efficiency, measured using an objective device, was related to an increased prevalence of home hypertension in Japanese adults
Q38813418Reliability and validity of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index in breast cancer patients
Q48108236Response to letter on "Validation study on sleep parameters by actigraphy for normal subjects".
Q99565889Screening for obstructive sleep apnea with novel hybrid acoustic smartphone app technology
Q39568675Short Blue Light Pulses (30 Min) in the Morning Support a Sleep-Advancing Protocol in a Home Setting.
Q47598177Sleep, training load and performance in elite female gymnasts.
Q47933206The first trial of CIM331, a humanized antihuman interleukin-31 receptor A antibody, in healthy volunteers and patients with atopic dermatitis to evaluate safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of a single dose in a randomized, double-blind, plac
Q50057362Validation of midsagittal jaw movements to measure sleep in healthy adults by comparison with actigraphy and polysomnography
Q48115867Validation study on sleep parameters by actigraphy for normal subjects