scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P50 | author | Wendy H. Teoh | Q48690928 |
P2093 | author name string | A T H Sia | |
M K Shah | |||
P2860 | cites work | Tracheal intubation using a Macintosh laryngoscope or a GlideScope ® in 15 patients with cervical spine immobilization | Q53654741 |
A clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective study | Q28235648 | ||
Difficult tracheal intubation: a retrospective study | Q28301212 | ||
Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics | Q34262564 | ||
The Pentax-AWS((R)) rigid indirect video laryngoscope: clinical assessment of performance in 320 cases | Q34778387 | ||
Clinical review: management of difficult airways | Q35629901 | ||
European Resuscitation Council guidelines for resuscitation 2005. Section 4. Adult advanced life support | Q36328274 | ||
Comparison of the GlideScope video laryngoscope vs. the intubating laryngeal mask for females with normal airways. | Q38552533 | ||
Airway Scope: early clinical experience in 405 patients | Q47882890 | ||
Soft palate perforation during orotracheal intubation facilitated by the GlideScope videolaryngoscope | Q48023491 | ||
Upper cervical spine movement during intubation: fluoroscopic comparison of the AirWay Scope, McCoy laryngoscope, and Macintosh laryngoscope | Q48032647 | ||
Comparison of the Airway Scope, gum elastic bougie and fibreoptic bronchoscope in simulated difficult tracheal intubation: a manikin study | Q48574102 | ||
Airway Scope for difficult intubation | Q48629713 | ||
Complications associated with the use of the GlideScope videolaryngoscope | Q48632730 | ||
The GlideScope Video Laryngoscope: randomized clinical trial in 200 patients | Q48823243 | ||
Perforation of the soft palate using the GlideScope videolaryngoscope. | Q50965763 | ||
P433 | issue | 10 | |
P407 | language of work or name | English | Q1860 |
P1104 | number of pages | 5 | |
P304 | page(s) | 1125-1129 | |
P577 | publication date | 2009-10-01 | |
P1433 | published in | Anaesthesia | Q59768 |
P1476 | title | Randomised comparison of Pentax AirwayScope and Glidescope for tracheal intubation in patients with normal airway anatomy | |
P478 | volume | 64 |
Q34513145 | A systematic review of the role of videolaryngoscopy in successful orotracheal intubation |
Q41933143 | Airway Management in Disaster Response: A Manikin Study Comparing Direct and Video Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation by Prehospital Providers in Level C Personal Protective Equipment |
Q48249861 | Comparison of postoperative pharyngeal morbidity using the Macintosh laryngoscope or AirWay Scope after mastectomy |
Q47137990 | Comparison of the Pentax AirwayScope and McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope for endotracheal intubation in patients with a normal airway |
Q36294529 | Difficult Airway Society 2015 guidelines for management of unanticipated difficult intubation in adults |
Q37951410 | Glidescope® video-laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
Q37322525 | Post-intubation sore throat and menstruation cycles |
Q37651919 | Postoperative sore throat after laryngoscopy with macintosh or glide scope video laryngoscope blade in normal airway patients. |
Q92317824 | Postoperative sore throat and subglottic injury after McGrath® MAC videolaryngoscopic intubation with versus without a stylet in patients with a high Mallampati score: a randomized controlled trial |
Q45892398 | Video-laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in critically ill patients: a pilot randomized trial |
Q39008944 | Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adult patients requiring tracheal intubation. |
Search more.