| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P2093 | author name string | Roger Strand | |
| Stephanie Meirmans | |||
| P2860 | cites work | Sexual reproduction as an adaptation to resist parasites (a review) | Q22066201 |
| Epidemiology and genetics in the coevolution of parasites and hosts | Q28261345 | ||
| Why sex and recombination? | Q28283292 | ||
| Spatial ecological and genetic structure of a mixed population of sexual diploid and apomictic triploid dandelions. | Q31028240 | ||
| Deleterious mutations and the evolution of sexual reproduction | Q34164458 | ||
| Experimental tests of the adaptive significance of sexual recombination | Q34609885 | ||
| Mammalian chiasma frequencies as a test of two theories of recombination | Q43692760 | ||
| Variation in asexual lineage age in Potamopyrgus antipodarum, a New Zealand snail | Q44914739 | ||
| On the track of the Red Queen: bark beetles, their nematodes, local climate and geographic parthenogenesis. | Q46789020 | ||
| Why sex? Putting theory to the test. | Q50863153 | ||
| Parasites and mutational load: an experimental test of a pluralistic theory for the evolution of sex. | Q54491549 | ||
| Parasitism, mutation accumulation and the maintenance of sex | Q59086589 | ||
| P304 | page(s) | S3-12 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2010-03-01 | |
| P1433 | published in | Journal of Heredity | Q6295280 |
| P1476 | title | Why are there so many theories for sex, and what do we do with them? | |
| P478 | volume | 101 Suppl 1 |
| Q34778106 | Comparative transcriptome analysis of obligately asexual and cyclically sexual rotifers reveals genes with putative functions in sexual reproduction, dormancy, and asexual egg production. |
| Q116206084 | Evolutionary Dynamics and Consequences of Parthenogenesis in Vertebrates |
| Q48155499 | General environmental heterogeneity as the explanation of sexuality? Comparative study shows that ancient asexual taxa are associated with both biotically and abiotically homogeneous environments |
| Q42011050 | Low parasitism rates in parthenogenetic bagworm moths do not support the parasitoid hypothesis for sex. |
| Q21090676 | Mating type gene homologues and putative sex pheromone-sensing pathway in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, a presumably asexual plant root symbiont |
| Q34036208 | Sex in the PAC: a hidden affair in dark septate endophytes? |
| Q28608032 | Sexual reproduction with variable mating systems can resist asexuality in a rock-paper-scissors dynamics |
| Q56531721 | The other eukaryotes in light of evolutionary protistology |
| Q44781392 | Wains: a pattern-seeking artificial life species |
| Q39367473 | Why Sex? A Pluralist Approach Revisited |
Search more.