| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P356 | DOI | 10.1093/EJO/CJX084 |
| P698 | PubMed publication ID | 29069355 |
| P2093 | author name string | Lars Bondemark | |
| Salem Abdulraheem | |||
| P2860 | cites work | CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials | Q24614627 |
| What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials | Q24647858 | ||
| The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data | Q26778373 | ||
| Are missing outcome data adequately handled? A review of published randomized controlled trials in major medical journals | Q31016853 | ||
| Intention-to-treat analysis: implications for quantitative and qualitative research | Q35612648 | ||
| Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: new concepts are needed to study research participation effects | Q37671448 | ||
| Randomized controlled trial: the gold standard or an unobtainable fallacy? | Q38542027 | ||
| Modified intention-to-treat analysis did not bias trial results. | Q38631733 | ||
| The reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in orthodontics | Q39178162 | ||
| Intention to treat--who should use ITT? | Q42389779 | ||
| Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: a comparative before-and-after evaluation. | Q52964999 | ||
| P577 | publication date | 2017-10-21 | |
| P1433 | published in | European Journal of Orthodontics | Q15749768 |
| P1476 | title | Intention to treat (ITT) analysis as reported in orthodontic randomized controlled trials-evaluations of methodology and recommendations for the accurate use of ITT analysis and handling dropouts |
| Q90168980 | Assessing the reporting quality in randomized controlled trials of acupuncture for postherpetic neuralgia using the CONSORT statement and STRICTA guidelines | cites work | P2860 |
Search more.