The effect of different utility measures on the cost-effectiveness of bilateral cochlear implantation

scientific article published on 28 August 2014

The effect of different utility measures on the cost-effectiveness of bilateral cochlear implantation is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1002/LARY.24902
P698PubMed publication ID25169819
P5875ResearchGate publication ID265171902

P2093author name stringNicole Mittmann
Joseph M Chen
Wei Qian
Hosam Amoodi
Jafri Kuthubutheen
P2860cites workThe Health Utilities Index (HUI): concepts, measurement properties and applicationsQ24616711
Impact of cochlear implants on the functional health status of older adultsQ34781048
The role of health care providers and significant others in evaluating the quality of life of patients with chronic diseaseQ35036667
Choosing between measures: comparison of EQ-5D, HUI2 and HUI3 in persons with hearing complaints.Q36087642
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cochlear implants for severe to profound deafness in children and adults: a systematic review and economic model.Q37607408
The cost-utility of bilateral cochlear implantation: a systematic reviewQ37959901
Foundations of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Health and Medical PracticesQ41231603
Who should measure quality of life?Q42234259
Cost-utility analysis of bilateral cochlear implantation in adults: a health economic assessment from the perspective of a publicly funded programQ48096235
A comparison of patient and proxy symptom assessments in advanced cancer patientsQ48732694
The economics of cochlear implant management in France: a multicentre analysisQ50444958
Criteria of candidacy for unilateral cochlear implantation in postlingually deafened adults II: cost-effectiveness analysis.Q50478822
A prospective study of the cost-utility of the multichannel cochlear implant.Q50499179
Assessing cost-effectiveness in healthcare: history of the $50,000 per QALY threshold.Q51960934
Randomized trials with quality of life endpoints: are doctors' ratings of patients' physical symptoms interchangeable with patients' self-ratings?Q52895881
P433issue2
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P921main subjectcochlear implantQ724965
P304page(s)442-447
P577publication date2014-08-28
P1433published inThe LaryngoscopeQ15755068
P1476titleThe effect of different utility measures on the cost-effectiveness of bilateral cochlear implantation
P478volume125

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q48344388Aggregating the symptoms of superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome
Q38909273Agreement between health utility instruments in cochlear implantation.
Q59132648Bilateral Cochlear Implantation: A Health Technology Assessment
Q38641424Cost-effectiveness of pediatric bilateral cochlear implantation in Spain.
Q37679118Measurement properties of the EQ-5D across four major geriatric conditions: Findings from TOPICS-MDS
Q64230063No Difference in Behavioral and Self-Reported Outcomes for Simultaneous and Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implantation: Evidence From a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Q30370885Proceedings of the Annual Symposium of the American Cochlear Implant Alliance
Q38370977The Advances in Hearing Rehabilitation and Cochlear Implants in China

Search more.