Aging and distraction by irrelevant speech: does emotional valence matter?

scientific article published on 11 July 2010

Aging and distraction by irrelevant speech: does emotional valence matter? is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1093/GERONB/GBQ048
P698PubMed publication ID20624760
P5875ResearchGate publication ID45167156

P50authorPascal W M Van GervenQ79428534
P2093author name stringDana R Murphy
P2860cites workThe influence of emotional valence on age differences in early processing and memoryQ35574636
The irrelevant speech effect and the level of interference in agingQ38397391
Valence of distractor words increases the effects of irrelevant speech on serial recallQ38418814
Performance in auditory and visual emotional stroop tasks: a comparison of older and younger adultsQ38419950
Goal-directed memory: the role of cognitive control in older adults' emotional memory.Q45942693
Equivalent irrelevant-sound effects for old and young adultsQ50456596
Age-related differences in irrelevant-speech effects.Q51889355
Irrelevant speech effect in aging: an assessment of inhibitory processes in working memory.Q52199275
P433issue6
P304page(s)667-670
P577publication date2010-07-11
P1433published inJournal of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social SciencesQ15746677
P1476titleAging and distraction by irrelevant speech: does emotional valence matter?
P478volume65

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q38842374Age-Related Changes in Attentional Control Using an N-Back Working Memory Paradigm
Q86839081Aging and response interference across sensory modalities
Q64134093Aging increases distraction by auditory oddballs in visual, but not auditory tasks
Q30420322Individual differences in distractibility: An update and a model
Q36747049Selective Attention and Sensory Modality in Aging: Curses and Blessings
Q50106534The irrelevant speech effect among younger and older adults: The influence of background noises on reading comprehension
Q36992090Visual Acuity does not Moderate Effect Sizes of Higher-Level Cognitive Tasks