Is hospital procedure volume a reliable marker of quality for coronary artery bypass surgery? A comparison of risk and propensity adjusted operative and midterm outcomes.

scientific article published in June 2005

Is hospital procedure volume a reliable marker of quality for coronary artery bypass surgery? A comparison of risk and propensity adjusted operative and midterm outcomes. is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1016/J.ATHORACSUR.2004.12.002
P698PubMed publication ID15919292
P5875ResearchGate publication ID7823070

P2093author name stringThomas J Papadimos
Robert H Habib
Thomas A Schwann
Milo Engoren
Samuel J Durham
Aamir Shah
Anoar Zacharias
Christopher J Riordan
P433issue6
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P921main subjectcoronary artery bypass surgeryQ186020
P304page(s)1961-1969
P577publication date2005-06-01
P1433published inThe Annals of Thoracic SurgeryQ1939819
P1476titleIs hospital procedure volume a reliable marker of quality for coronary artery bypass surgery? A comparison of risk and propensity adjusted operative and midterm outcomes.
P478volume79

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q42639193An attempt to analyze the relation between hospital surgical volume and clinical outcome
Q45771093Association between urologists' caseload volume and in-hospital mortality for transurethral resection of prostate: a nationwide population-based study
Q45300461Cardiac surgical outcomes improvement led by a physician champion working with a nurse clinical coordinator
Q36661465Re-examining the significance of surgical volume to breast cancer survival and recurrence versus process quality of care in Taiwan
Q37539266The critical limitations of volume-outcome analysis

Search more.