Intraabdominal adhesion formation of polypropylene mesh. Influence of coverage of omentum and polyglactin. (scientific article published on 3 May 2005)

The use of biomaterials in the repair of abdominal wall defects: a comparative study between polypropylene meshes (Marlex) and a new polytetrafluoroethylene prosthesis (Dual Mesh)

Q73942162

Seprafilm reduces adhesions to polypropylene mesh

Q73943427

Long-term complications associated with prosthetic repair of incisional hernias

Q74494039

A comparison of prosthetic materials used to repair abdominal wall defects

Q77146150

[Retromuscular mesh repair for ventral incision hernia in Germany]

Q77150561

Intraabdominal adhesion formation after preperitoneal dissection in the murine model

Q77738579

The surface of the greater omentum in the human and its vulnerability in intra-abdominal surgical interventions

Q93620234

The outcomes of nonabsorbable mesh placed within the abdominal cavity: literature review and clinical experience

Q41724672

Intraperitoneal adhesions in laparoscopic and standard open herniorrhaphy. An experimental study

Q42647931

Laparoscopic approach to incisional hernia

Q42686600

Intraperitoneal polypropylene mesh repair of incisional hernia is not associated with enterocutaneous fistula

Q43916357

Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair.

Q44801465

Adhesion formation after incisional hernia repair: a randomized porcine trial

Q46403123

Impact of polymer pore size on the interface scar formation in a rat model

Q47189473

Adhesion formation after intraperitoneal and extraperitoneal implantation of polypropylene mesh.

Q53958843

Tissue response to polypropylene meshes used in the repair of abdominal wall defects.

Q54131642

The greater omentum: physiology and immunological concepts

Q67851513

Characteristics of prosthetic mesh and autogenous fascia in abdominal wall reconstruction after prolonged implantation

Q67967346

Prophylaxis of pelvic sidewall adhesions with Gore-Tex surgical membrane: a multicenter clinical investigation. The Surgical Membrane Study Group

Q68084827

Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch versus polypropylene mesh for the repair of contaminated defects of the abdominal wall

Q70545705

[Laparoscopic repair of ventral abdominal wall hernias]

Q71180569

Enterocutaneous fistula after Marlex net implantation. A rare complication after incisional hernia repair

Q72051401

Comparison of adhesion formation in transperitoneal laparoscopic herniorrhaphy techniques

Q72264727

Reherniation after repair of the abdominal wall with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene

Q72457069

A comparison of prosthetic materials used to repair abdominal wall defects

Q72791153

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with extraperitoneal mesh: surgical technique and early results

Q73305094

The behavior of different types of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) prostheses in the reparative scarring process of abdominal wall defects

Q73514325

P433

issue

P407

language of work or name

English

Q1860

P304

page(s)

798-803

P577

publication date

2005-05-03

P1433

published in

Surgical Endoscopy

Q7646203

P1476

title

Intraabdominal adhesion formation of polypropylene mesh. Influence of coverage of omentum and polyglactin

P478

volume

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)

Q43050293	A comparison of a bovine albumin/glutaraldehyde glue versus fibrin sealant for hernia mesh fixation in experimental onlay and IPOM repair in rats
Q46092466	Absence of circulating aldosterone attenuates foreign body reaction around surgical sutures
Q86837682	Adhesions to sutures, tackers, and glue for intraperitoneal mesh fixation: an experimental study
Q37827732	Biocompatibility of prosthetic meshes in abdominal surgery
Q44905703	Coated meshes for hernia repair provide comparable intraperitoneal adhesion prevention.
Q41863358	Comparative evaluation of adhesions to intraperitoneally placed fixation materials: a laparoscopic study in rats: adhesions to fixation materials.
Q57305850	Comparison of three separate antiadhesive barriers for intraperitoneal onlay mesh hernia repair in an experimental model
Q43486514	Evaluation of three purely polypropylene meshes of different pore sizes in an onlay position in a New Zealand white rabbit model
Q84544369	Influence of small intestinal serosal defect closure on leakage rate and adhesion formation: a pilot study using rabbit models
Q39911953	Intraperitoneal onlay mesh: an experimental study of adhesion formation in a sheep model
Q37860197	Mesh biocompatibility: effects of cellular inflammation and tissue remodelling
Q50932690	Mesh migration into the esophageal wall after mesh hiatoplasty: comparison of two alloplastic materials.
Q42664310	Multicentric observational cohort study evaluating a composite mesh with incorporated oxidized regenerated cellulose in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair
Q50502529	Nonwoven polypropylene prosthesis in large abdominal wall defects in rats.
Q84265367	Novel technique of overlaying a poly-L: -lactic acid nanosheet for adhesion prophylaxis and fixation of intraperitoneal onlay polypropylene mesh in a rabbit model
Q37661292	Prevention of Intraabdominal Adhesions: An Experimental Study Using Mitomycin-C and 4% Icodextrin
Q47335667	The use of composite meshes in laparoscopic repair of abdominal wall hernias: are there differences in biocompatibily?: experimental results obtained in a laparoscopic porcine model
Q85175262	Two port laparoscopic ventral hernia mesh repair: An innovative technical advancement

P356	DOI	10.1007/S00464-004-2192-5
P698	PubMed publication ID	15868269