Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children and adolescents

scientific article published on 13 March 2018

Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children and adolescents is …
instance of (P31):
meta-analysisQ815382
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1002/14651858.CD003452.PUB4
P932PMC publication ID6494411
P698PubMed publication ID29534303

P2093author name stringKevin D O'Brien
Badri Thiruvenkatachari
Jayne E Harrison
Klaus Bsl Batista
P2860cites workOrthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in childrenQ24202478
Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth in childrenQ24244178
Treatment effects of removable functional appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysisQ26998876
A comparison between two lingual orthodontic brackets in terms of speech performance and patients' acceptance in correcting Class II, Division 1 malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial.Q30372992
A prospective evaluation of Bass, Bionator and Twin Block appliances. Part II--The soft tissuesQ31917784
Skeletal and dental changes in Class II division 1 malocclusions treated with splint-type Herbst appliances. A systematic reviewQ33275312
A controlled clinical trial of the effects of the Twin Block and Dynamax appliances on the hard and soft tissuesQ33282687
Early treatment outcome assessed by the Peer Assessment Rating indexQ33608854
The effects of Twin Blocks: A prospective controlled studyQ50909634
Monitoring growth during orthodontic treatmentQ50979133
Temporomandibular disorders after early Class II treatment with bionators and headgears: results from a randomized controlled trialQ50979141
A systematic review of the relationship between overjet size and traumatic dental injuriesQ33775065
Current concepts on functional appliances and mandibular growth stimulationQ34076364
Treatment effects of the Jasper Jumper and the Bionator associated with fixed appliancesQ34116312
Meta-analysis of skeletal mandibular changes during Frankel appliance treatment.Q34126593
Comparative study of the Fränkel (FR-2) and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusionQ34131542
Effectiveness of treatment for Class II malocclusion with the Herbst or twin-block appliances: a randomized, controlled trialQ34223249
Comparison of temporomandibular joint changes in Twin Block and Bionator appliance therapy: a magnetic resonance imaging studyQ34274387
Socio-economic indicators and predisposing factors associated with traumatic dental injuries in schoolchildren at Brasília, Brazil: a cross-sectional, population-based studyQ34467726
The correction of Class II, division 1 malocclusion with bionator headgear combination applianceQ34479716
Preadolescent Class II problems: treat now or wait?Q34702356
Dentoskeletal effects of Class II malocclusion treatment with the Twin Block appliance in a Brazilian sample: a prospective study.Q34986312
Functional appliance treatment assessed using the PAR indexQ35022724
Comparison of peer assessment ratings (PAR) from 1-phase and 2-phase treatment protocols for Class II malocclusionsQ35128867
External apical root resorption in Class II malocclusion: a retrospective review of 1- versus 2-phase treatmentQ35201453
Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the Twin-block appliance: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 1: Dental and skeletal effectsQ35217366
Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of periodontal and bone support loss in extraction casesQ35263748
Outcomes in a 2-phase randomized clinical trial of early Class II treatmentQ35793139
Priority oral health research identification for clinical decision-makingQ35817548
Impact of Malocclusion on the Quality of Life of Brazilian Adolescents: A Population-Based Study.Q36149994
The effects of early headgear treatment on dental arches and craniofacial morphology: an 8 year report of a randomized studyQ36165714
Mandibular changes produced by functional appliances in Class II malocclusion: a systematic review.Q36470409
Short-term anteroposterior treatment effects of functional appliances and extraoral traction on class II malocclusion. A meta-analysisQ36954482
Treatment effects of fixed functional appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Q37023518
The effectiveness of the Herbst appliance for patients with Class II malocclusion: a meta-analysisQ37023938
Immediate skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of the crown- or banded type Herbst appliance on Class II division 1 malocclusion.Q37077592
Quality control in orthodontics: indices of treatment need and treatment standardsQ37673344
Treatment effects of R-appliance and anterior inclined bite plate in class II, division I malocclusionQ37680623
Epidemiologic panorama of dental occlusionQ37948802
Short-term treatment effects produced by the Twin-block appliance: a systematic review and meta-analysisQ38232801
Evaluation of the effects of functional orthopaedic treatment on temporomandibular joints with single-photon emission computerized tomographyQ38494299
A comparison of the efficacy of fixed versus removable functional appliances in children with Class II malocclusion: A systematic reviewQ38656335
Predictive value of masseter muscle thickness and bite force on Class II functional appliance treatment: a prospective controlled studyQ39060835
Assessment of the changes in arch perimeter and irregularity in the mandibular arch during initial alignment with the AcceleDent Aura appliance vs no appliance in adolescents: A single-blind randomized clinical trialQ39147916
Upper airway changes following single-step or stepwise advancement using the Functional Mandibular AdvancerQ39260024
Changes in soft tissue profile following treatment with the bionatorQ51023877
Maxillary and cranial base changes during treatment with functional appliances.Q51029201
Orthodontic treatment efficiency with self-ligating and conventional edgewise twin brackets: a prospective randomized clinical trialQ51354785
Effects of miniplate anchored and conventional Forsus Fatigue Resistant Devices in the treatment of Class II malocclusionQ51412591
A cephalometric comparison of treatment with the Twin-block and stainless steel crown Herbst appliances followed by fixed appliance therapyQ51654838
Comparison of patient acceptance of the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device with and without mini-implant anchorage: a randomized controlled trialQ51663877
Dentoskeletal and soft-tissue changes with cervical headgear and mandibular protraction appliance therapy in the treatment of Class II malocclusionsQ51757528
Incisor trauma and early treatment for Class II Division 1 malocclusionQ52022246
A 3-dimensional analysis of molar movement during headgear treatmentQ52048651
Class II correction in patients treated with class II elastics and with fixed functional appliances: a comparative studyQ52075497
The prevalence of orthodontic treatment needQ52860105
The impact of two different malocclusion traits on quality of lifeQ53207582
An international comparison of early treatment of angle Class-II/1 cases. Skeletal effects of the first phase of a prospective clinical trialQ53340640
Anchorage loss due to Herbst mechanics-preventable through miniscrews?Q53377424
Accelerated tooth movement with piezocision and its periodontal-transversal effects in patients with Class II malocclusionQ53500077
Treatment of large overjet in Angle Class II: division 1 malocclusion with Andresen activators versus prefabricated functional appliances-a multicenter, randomized, controlled trialQ53657774
Dental and orthopedic effects of high-pull headgear in treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusionQ54262464
Intensive treatment of severe Class II malocclusions with a headgear-Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition.Q54584554
Hard and soft tissue changes following the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion using twin-block applianceQ57098453
Soft tissue changes following the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion using Headgear-activator applianceQ57098465
Early treatment for Class II Division 1 malocclusion with the Twin-block appliance: A multi-center, randomized, controlled trialQ57168495
Mandibular changes during functional appliance treatmentQ60684155
Comparison of Modified Teuscher and Van Beek Functional Appliance Therapies in High-Angle CasesQ63350676
Treatment with an orthopedic appliance system in relation to treatment intensity and growth periods. A study of initial effectsQ68750835
Does the mandible alter its functional position during activator treatment?Q69391129
The effect of the amount of protrusion built into the bionator on condylar growth and displacement: a clinical studyQ69607045
Effects of a fixed magnetic appliance on the dentofacial complexQ69623749
Orthopedic and orthodontic effects resulting from the use of a functional appliance with different amounts of protrusive activationQ69714338
Clinical relevance of step-by-step mandibular advancement in the treatment of mandibular retrusion using the Fränkel applianceQ69768445
Cephalometric changes in Class II, Division 1 cases after orthopedic treatment with the bioactivatorQ69946129
A cephalometric investigation of the effects of the Elastic Bite-block in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusionsQ70807202
Mandibular growth, condyle position and Fränkel appliance therapyQ70910473
A cephalometric evaluation of the dental and facial-skeletal effects using the Bionator with stepwise protrusive activationsQ71054785
Morphogenetic response to activator treatmentQ71068329
Orthodontic and orthopedic effects of Activator, Activator-HG combination, and Bass appliances: a comparative studyQ71208263
Self-concept, Class II malocclusion, and early treatmentQ71244515
Class II: a comparison of activator and activator headgear combination appliancesQ71998909
Dentofacial and soft tissue changes in Class II, division 1 cases treated with and without extractionsQ72400605
Comparison of the effects of monoblock and twin-block appliances on the skeletal and dentoalveolar structuresQ73054150
Ratings of profile attractiveness after functional appliance treatmentQ73072885
Treatment effects of the mandibular anterior repositioning appliance on patients with Class II malocclusionQ73129046
A prospective study of Twin-block appliance therapy assessed by magnetic resonance imagingQ73231341
The effect of early intervention on skeletal pattern in Class II malocclusion: a randomized clinical trialQ73242927
Influences on the outcome of early treatment for Class II malocclusionQ73348089
[Comparative study of mandibular growth and rotation in two sample groups treated according to the "Distal Active Concept" or the Edgewise technique]Q73483046
Comparison of 2 modifications of the twin-block appliance in matched Class II samplesQ73982120
A prospective optical surface scanning and cephalometric assessment of the effect of functional appliances on the soft tissuesQ73996226
Effects of headgear Herbst and mandibular step-by-step advancement versus conventional Herbst appliance and maximal jumping of the mandibleQ74055992
Headgear versus function regulator in the early treatment of Class II, Division 1 malocclusion: A randomized clinical trialQ74146981
The effect of treatment with the Bass appliance on skeletal Class II malocclusions: a cephalometric investigationQ74152976
Fränkel appliance therapy and the temporomandibular disc: a prospective magnetic resonance imaging studyQ74230913
Effects of different vectors of forces applied by combined headgearQ74364037
Radiographic evaluation of apical root resorption with 2 different types of edgewise appliances. Results of a randomized clinical trialQ74520862
A comparative analysis of maxillary tooth movement produced by cervical headgear and pend-x applianceQ75250868
The effects of early headgear treatment on dental arches and craniofacial morphology: a report of a 2 year randomized studyQ76395987
Effectiveness of early treatment of Class II malocclusionQ77476813
A prospective evaluation of Bass, Bionator and Twin Block appliances. Part I--The hard tissuesQ77589986
Early treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion--comparison of alternative treatment modalitiesQ77732376
A comparison of splinted and banded Herbst appliances: treatment changes and complicationsQ78602613
Occurrence of malocclusion and need of orthodontic treatment in early mixed dentitionQ79357075
Comparison of the headgear activator and Herbst appliance--effects and post-treatment changesQ79400626
[Assessment of upper jaw extraction versus upper and lower jaw extraction treatment for class II division 1 malocclusion using peer assessment rating index]Q79919383
Changes in the curve of Spee with treatment and at 2 years posttreatmentQ80051186
Effects of bilateral upper first premolar extraction on the mandibleQ80058164
[A study of highpull extraoral traction on the treatment of growing patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion]Q80218028
Stepwise advancement versus maximum jumping with headgear activatorQ80447733
Incremental versus maximum bite advancement during twin-block therapy: a randomized controlled clinical trialQ80946976
Timing of Class II treatment: skeletal changes comparing 1-phase and 2-phase treatmentQ81405469
[Comparative study of the clinical effects of three different functional appliances on the treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion]Q81945061
[Use of PAR index to evaluate the treatment outcome for Class II division 1 malocclusion with different tooth extraction patterns]Q82769403
Comparison of the effects of fixed and removable functional appliances on the skeletal and dentoalveolar structuresQ83527993
Effect of timing on the outcomes of 1-phase nonextraction therapy of Class II malocclusionQ84676236
Long-term dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes induced by bionator therapyQ84774233
Long-term dentoskeletal changes with the Bionator, Herbst, Twin Block, and MARA functional appliancesQ84774237
Effectiveness of twin blocks and extraoral maxillary splint (Thurow) appliances for the correction of Class II relationshipsQ85105661
Treatment effects of the R-appliance and twin block in Class II division 1 malocclusionQ85214308
[Comparison of temporomandibular joint changes in adolescent Class II devision 1 malocclusion patients with mandibular retrusion treated with Twin-block and Class II elastics]Q85639776
Effectiveness of twin-block and Mandibular Protraction Appliance-IV in the improvement of pharyngeal airway passage dimensions in Class II malocclusion subjects with a retrognathic mandibleQ85653576
[Efficacy evaluation of fixed Twin-block appliance and tooth extraction in skeletal Class II malocclusion]Q86413784
Combined fixed-functional treatment of skeletal class II malocclusions with the EVAA appliance: a preliminary studyQ88221216
[Soft tissue linear evaluation of fixed Twin-block appliance treatment and tooth extraction in skeletal Class II malocclusion]Q95370821
Treatment effects of R-appliance and Fränkel-2 in Class II division 1 malocclusionsQ95532407
Changes of arch width in the early treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusionsQ39391853
Comparison of stepwise vs single-step advancement with the Functional Mandibular Advancer in Class II division 1 treatmentQ39639766
A prospective controlled evaluation of Class II division 1 malocclusions treated with fixed lingual mandibular growth modificatorQ40133830
Dental and social effects of malocclusion and effectivenessof orthodontic treatment: a reviewQ40283065
Class II subdivision treatment with the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device vs intermaxillary elastics.Q40414419
Effects of Sabbagh Universal Spring 2 fixed functional appliance on class II/1 patients at their postpubertal-peak growth period compared with the extraction method : A randomized clinical trialQ40421414
Combined treatment with headgear and the Frog appliance for maxillary molar distalization: a randomized controlled trial.Q40595406
Attitudes and compliance of pre-adolescent children during early treatment of Class II malocclusionQ40827435
Three-dimensional effects of the mini-implant-anchored Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device: A randomized controlled trial.Q40924062
Associations between changes in selected facial dimensions and the outcome of orthodontic treatment.Q41019159
Anteroposterior skeletal and dental changes after early Class II treatment with bionators and headgearQ41697341
Benefit of early Class II treatment: Progress report of a two-phase randomized clinical trialQ41697347
Comparison of the effects of passive posterior bite-blocks with different construction bites on the craniofacial and dentoalveolar structuresQ42662312
Skeletal versus conventional intraoral anchorage for the treatment of class II malocclusion: dentoalveolar and skeletal effectsQ42818067
Effect of early Class II treatment on the incidence of incisor traumaQ43877154
Comparative cephalometric study of Class II malocclusion treatment with Pendulum and Jones jig appliances followed by fixed corrective orthodontics.Q43972060
Assessment of changes following en-masse retraction with mini-implants anchorage compared to two-step retraction with conventional anchorage in patients with class II division 1 malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial.Q44045494
Use of the Clark Twin Block functional appliance with and without an upper labial bow: a randomized controlled trialQ44098311
Treatment effects of the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device used with miniscrew anchorageQ44272886
Clinical study of extraction treatment of Class II division I malocclusion with Empower self-ligating bracketsQ44664409
Long-term treatment effects of the FR-2 appliance of Fränkel.Q44760012
Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and the activator-headgear combination appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatmentQ44833545
Palatal implant versus zygoma plate anchorage for distalization of maxillary posterior teeth.Q45190837
Class II treatment by extraction of maxillary first molars or Herbst appliance: dentoskeletal and soft tissue effects in comparisonQ45354010
Changes on facial profile in the mixed dentition, from natural growth and induced by Balters' bionator applianceQ45375100
Soft tissue effects of Twin Block and Herbst appliances in patients with Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathyQ45769448
Long-term skeletal and dental effects and treatment timing for functional appliances in Class II malocclusionQ45874678
Prevalence of malocclusion among Latino adolescentsQ46141983
Comparison of Twin-block and Dynamax appliances for the treatment of Class II malocclusion in adolescents: a randomized controlled trialQ46203635
Temporal muscle activity during the first year of Class II, division 1 malocclusion treatment with an activatorQ46664209
Midpalatal miniscrews and high-pull headgear for anteroposterior and vertical anchorage control: Cephalometric comparisons of treatment changesQ46830122
Discomfort, expectations, and experiences during treatment of large overjet with Andresen Activator or Prefabricated Functional Appliance: a questionnaire surveyQ47374035
Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the Twin-block appliance: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 2: Psychosocial effectsQ47388402
Treatment outcomes of Class II malocclusion cases treated with miniscrew-anchored Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device: A randomized controlled trialQ47699970
Class II treatment effects of the Fränkel appliance.Q47797936
Comparative evaluation of a new removable Jasper Jumper functional appliance vs an activator-headgear combinationQ47801675
A Pilot Study on the Dentoalveolar and Skeletal Effects of Two Functional Appliances in Class II, Division 1 Growing ChildrenQ47939494
Clinical outcomes of Fränkel appliance therapy assessed with a counterpart analysisQ47973493
Bullying in orthodontic patients and its relationship to malocclusion,self-esteem and oral health-related quality of life.Q48523194
Stability of the palatal rugae as landmarks for analysis of dental castsQ48545763
Nocturnal masseter and suprahyoid muscle activity induced by wearing a bionatorQ48670198
Effectiveness of intra- and extraoral aids to the bionator. A controlled study within the scope of the "Wuerzburg concept".Q48748681
Zygomatic mini-implant for Class II correction in growing patientsQ48864060
Dentoskeletal effects of Twin Block and Herbst appliances in patients with Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathyQ48878007
Upper airway changes after Xbow appliance therapy evaluated with cone beam computed tomographyQ48906968
Mandibular growth and dentoalveolar development in the treatment of class II, division 1, malocclusion using Balters Bionator according to the skeletal maturationQ48911701
Angle Class II correction with MARA applianceQ48941915
Efficacy of the Sander bite-jumping appliance in growing patients with mandibular retrusion: a randomized controlled trialQ49018501
One phase or two-phase orthodontic treatment: comparisonsQ49038977
Morphometric analysis of treatment effects of the Balters bionator in growing Class II patients.Q49051323
Skeletal and dental outcomes of a new magnetic functional appliance, the Sydney Magnoglide, in Class II correctionQ49141700
Dentoskeletal effects of the Bite-Jumping Appliance and the Twin-Block Appliance in the treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled trialQ50624519
P304page(s)CD003452
P577publication date2018-03-13
P1433published inCochrane Database of Systematic ReviewsQ15750361
P1476titleOrthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children and adolescents
P478volume3

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q94504262Dentoskeletal effects of the maxillary splint headgear in the early correction of Class II malocclusion
Q91892784Difference and Commonness Among CLP, NON-CLP Patients and Their Parents Seeking for Orthodontic Treatment: A Questionnaire Applying Q Methodology to Investigate Motives
Q93147187Long-term effects of functional appliances in treated versus untreated patients with Class II malocclusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Q92686396Pediatricians' awareness on orthodontic problems and related conditions-a national survey
Q99711133The Jaw Epidemic: Recognition, Origins, Cures, and Prevention

Search more.