No need for inhibitory tagging of locations in visual search.

scientific article published in February 2009

No need for inhibitory tagging of locations in visual search. is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P6179Dimensions Publication ID1021760704
P356DOI10.3758/PBR.16.1.116
P698PubMed publication ID19145020

P50authorJohan HullemanQ50714250
P2860cites workInhibition of returnQ28140156
A feature-integration theory of attentionQ28281952
A signal detection model predicts the effects of set size on visual search accuracy for feature, conjunction, triple conjunction, and disjunction displaysQ41749925
How the deployment of attention determines what we see.Q42907873
How many objects can you track? Evidence for a resource-limited attentive tracking mechanismQ46903745
Sit-and-wait strategies in dynamic visual search.Q47831663
Attention, spatial representation, and visual neglect: simulating emergent attention and spatial memory in the selective attention for identification model (SAIM).Q48409065
Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism.Q48951758
Search for multiple targets: evidence for memory-based control of attention.Q51681620
Search for multiple targets: remember the targets, forget the search.Q51968128
In search of remembrance: evidence for memory in visual search.Q51968322
On the manifestations of memory in visual search.Q52019942
Visual search has no memory.Q52037961
Inhibitory tagging in visual search can be found if search stimuli remain visible.Q52165132
Perceptual integration of motion and form information: evidence of parallel-continuous processing.Q52166573
Inhibition of return and visual search: how many separate loci are inhibited?Q52166579
Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention.Q52216435
Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual searchQ55982827
Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual searchQ59055595
Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual searchQ72828123
Probing distractor inhibition in visual search: inhibition of returnQ73096688
P433issue1
P304page(s)116-120
P577publication date2009-02-01
P1433published inPsychonomic Bulletin and ReviewQ15763410
P1476titleNo need for inhibitory tagging of locations in visual search.
P478volume16

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q48280237Disruption of spatial memory in visual search in the left visual field in patients with hemispatial neglect
Q51918834Inhibition of return in static but not necessarily in dynamic search.
Q51902972Inhibitory tagging in visual search: Only in difficult search are items tagged individually
Q30746257Losing the trees for the forest in dynamic visual search
Q42017880New Evidence for Strategic Differences between Static and Dynamic Search Tasks: An Individual Observer Analysis of Eye Movements
Q47727343On the brink: The demise of the item in visual search moves closer
Q50714193Search through complex motion displays does not break down under spatial memory load.
Q50673245Searching the same display twice: Properties of short-term memory in repeated search.
Q49142583The impending demise of the item in visual search

Search more.