Who can best recruit to randomized trials? Randomized trial comparing surgeons and nurses recruiting patients to a trial of treatments for localized prostate cancer (the ProtecT study).

scientific article published in July 2003

Who can best recruit to randomized trials? Randomized trial comparing surgeons and nurses recruiting patients to a trial of treatments for localized prostate cancer (the ProtecT study). is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1016/S0895-4356(03)00083-0
P698PubMed publication ID12921927

P50authorTim PetersQ30506668
David E. NealQ42941105
Jenny L DonovanQ58658676
Freddie HamdyQ67482650
David GillattQ92214695
Steven Edward OliverQ92608917
Sian M NobleQ97569094
P2093author name stringJ Athene Lane
Philip Powell
P2860cites workRecruitment of participants for the Estrogen Replacement and Atherosclerosis (ERA) trial. a comparison of costs, yields, and participant characteristics from community- and hospital-based recruitment strategiesQ31878770
Nurses' unique roles in randomized clinical trialsQ33589289
Barriers to participation in randomised controlled trials: a systematic reviewQ33784129
Quality improvement report: Improving design and conduct of randomised trials by embedding them in qualitative research: ProtecT (prostate testing for cancer and treatment) study. Commentary: presenting unbiased information to patients can be difficQ34938393
Randomised clinical trials in general practice: lessons from a failure.Q35181287
Recruitment of patients with lung cancer into a randomised clinical trial: experience at two centres. On behalf of the Big Lung Trial Steering CommitteeQ35533824
Recruitment strategies in the women's health trial: feasibility study in minority populations. WHT:FSMP Investigators Group. Women's Health Trial:Feasibility Study in Minority PopulationsQ39475581
Perceptions of equipoise are crucial to trial participation: a qualitative study of men in the ProtecT studyQ40587298
Participant recruitment in the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT).Q40672893
Patterns of patient enrollment in randomized controlled trialsQ40689809
Threats to the validity of clinical trials employing enrichment strategies for sample selectionQ41743212
Randomised controlled trials in general practiceQ42721728
Randomized trial of informed consent and recruitment for clinical trials in the immediate preoperative period.Q47622564
Recruitment for controlled clinical trials: literature summary and annotated bibliographyQ49109414
Telephone-based nursing intervention improves the effectiveness of the informed consent process in cancer clinical trials.Q52887445
How do doctors explain randomised clinical trials to their patients?Q60198894
New approach for recruitment into randomised controlled trialsQ72213727
P433issue7
P921main subjectprostate cancerQ181257
P304page(s)605-609
P577publication date2003-07-01
P1433published inJournal of Clinical EpidemiologyQ6294959
P1476titleWho can best recruit to randomized trials? Randomized trial comparing surgeons and nurses recruiting patients to a trial of treatments for localized prostate cancer (the ProtecT study).
P478volume56

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q36836679'The trial is owned by the team, not by an individual': a qualitative study exploring the role of teamwork in recruitment to randomised controlled trials in surgical oncology
Q30626731A core outcome set for localised prostate cancer effectiveness trials: protocol for a systematic review of the literature and stakeholder involvement through interviews and a Delphi survey
Q39375363An evaluation of the impact and costs of three strategies used to recruit acutely unwell young children to a randomised controlled trial in primary care
Q38224816Cost-effectiveness of health research study participant recruitment strategies: a systematic review
Q36639132Effect of child health status on parents' allowing children to participate in pediatric research
Q37422349Exceeding the recruitment target in a primary care paediatric trial: an evaluation of the Choice of Moisturiser for Eczema Treatment (COMET) feasibility randomised controlled trial.
Q58797089Factors associated with clinical trials that fail and opportunities for improving the likelihood of success: A review
Q36362504Factors influencing inclusion of patients with malignancies in clinical trials
Q37518916Factors influencing recruitment to research: qualitative study of the experiences and perceptions of research teams
Q27334893Guidelines for reporting embedded recruitment trials
Q36760288How to get older people included in clinical studies
Q34121705Improving the recruitment activity of clinicians in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review
Q34722413Increasing participation of cancer patients in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review
Q30477885Increasing recruitment to randomised trials: a review of randomised controlled trials
Q47187591Parental consent to participation in a randomised trial in children: associated child, family, and physician factors
Q55191154Patient-centered recruitment and retention for a randomized controlled study.
Q55021311Predicting enrollment performance of investigational centers in phase III multi-center clinical trials.
Q90257623Premature Termination of a Randomized Controlled Trial on Image-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy of Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression
Q36520484Presenting treatment options to men with clinically localized prostate cancer: the acceptability of active surveillance/monitoring
Q36406165Protocol for a single-centre randomised controlled trial of multimodal periarticular anaesthetic infiltration versus single-agent femoral nerve blockade as analgesia for total knee arthroplasty: Perioperative Analgesia for Knee Arthroplasty (PAKA).
Q24236564Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting for prostate cancer
Q35429861Recruiting donors for autopsy based cancer research
Q39838814Recruitment for a hospital-based pragmatic clinical trial using volunteer nurses and students.
Q64079173Recruitment strategies in randomised controlled trials of men aged 50 years and older: a systematic review
Q39390819SABRE 1 (Surgery Against Brachytherapy - a Randomised Evaluation): feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT) of brachytherapy vs radical prostatectomy in low-intermediate risk clinically localised prostate cancer.
Q33750254Strategies for increasing recruitment to randomised controlled trials: systematic review.
Q34503998Systematic techniques for assisting recruitment to trials (START): study protocol for embedded, randomized controlled trials
Q36520438The Prostate Cancer Intervention Versus Observation Trial: VA/NCI/AHRQ Cooperative Studies Program #407 (PIVOT): design and baseline results of a randomized controlled trial comparing radical prostatectomy with watchful waiting for men with clinical
Q33795300The intellectual challenges and emotional consequences of equipoise contributed to the fragility of recruitment in six randomized controlled trials
Q34067540Training recruiters to randomized trials to facilitate recruitment and informed consent by exploring patients' treatment preferences
Q37378981Treatment for PSA screen-detected prostate cancer: what are the options?
Q33569244Trials within trials? Researcher, funder and ethical perspectives on the practicality and acceptability of nesting trials of recruitment methods in existing primary care trials
Q33282907When "no" might not quite mean "no"; the importance of informed and meaningful non-consent: results from a survey of individuals refusing participation in a health-related research project

Search more.