scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P356 | DOI | 10.1097/00001888-199805000-00024 |
P698 | PubMed publication ID | 9609869 |
P50 | author | Gerd Gigerenzer | Q108184 |
P2093 | author name string | Hoffrage U | |
P433 | issue | 5 | |
P407 | language of work or name | English | Q1860 |
P921 | main subject | diagnosis | Q16644043 |
P304 | page(s) | 538-540 | |
P577 | publication date | 1998-05-01 | |
P1433 | published in | Academic Medicine | Q15751327 |
P1476 | title | Using natural frequencies to improve diagnostic inferences. | |
P478 | volume | 73 |
Q96303325 | A New Visualization for Probabilistic Situations Containing Two Binary Events: The Frequency Net |
Q85979013 | A Randomised Assessment of Trainee Doctors' Understanding and Interpretation of Diagnostic Test Results |
Q61448606 | A qualitative study of cardiovascular disease risk communication in NHS Health Check using different risk calculators: protocol for the RIsk COmmunication in NHS Health Check (RICO) study |
Q33713120 | Accepting risk in clinical research: is the gene therapy field becoming too risk-averse? |
Q92478538 | An Eye-Tracking Study of Statistical Reasoning With Tree Diagrams and 2 × 2 Tables |
Q47374743 | Anomalies in the detection of change: When changes in sample size are mistaken for changes in proportions |
Q48278453 | Another chance for good reasoning |
Q37846221 | Assessment for selection for the health care professions and specialty training: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference |
Q35635753 | Basic understanding of posterior probability |
Q39548603 | Bridging the gap between clinical practice and diagnostic clinical epidemiology: pilot experiences with a didactic model based on a logarithmic scale |
Q64056739 | Can Positive Framing Reduce Nocebo Side Effects? Current Evidence and Recommendation for Future Research |
Q41496250 | Can facts trump unconditional trust? Evidence-based information halves the influence of physicians' non-evidence-based cancer screening recommendations |
Q48165611 | Cancer screening is not only about numbers. |
Q35865146 | Chances and risks in medical risk communication |
Q90329162 | Communicating risk of medication side-effects: role of communication format on risk perception |
Q41882587 | Communicating study results to our patients: which way is best? |
Q24794450 | Communicating with patients about harms and risks |
Q73580851 | Communication of false-positive tests--can it be improved? |
Q37717756 | Creating and field-testing the questionnaire for the assessment of knowledge about cervical cancer and its prevention among schoolgirls and female students. |
Q57104905 | Decision making with visualizations: a cognitive framework across disciplines |
Q33373818 | Design of the BRISC study: a multicentre controlled clinical trial to optimize the communication of breast cancer risks in genetic counselling |
Q47646740 | Do doctors understand the test characteristics of lung cancer screening? |
Q38265977 | Doctors and numbers: an assessment of the critical risk interpretation test. |
Q50335964 | Does exposure to simulated patient cases improve accuracy of clinicians' predictive value estimates of diagnostic test results? A within-subjects experiment at St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada |
Q34148296 | Does prevalence matter to physicians in estimating post-test probability of disease? A randomized trial |
Q37425138 | Effect of Communication Style on Perceptions of Medication Side Effect Risk among Pharmacy Students |
Q35996141 | Effects of visualizing statistical information - an empirical study on tree diagrams and 2 × 2 tables |
Q46131827 | Empirical assessment of expertise |
Q50704599 | Evaluation of a cardiovascular disease risk assessment tool for the promotion of healthier lifestyles. |
Q37192824 | Event-based versus process-based informed consent to address scientific evidence and uncertainties in ionising medical imaging |
Q92106014 | Evidencing How Experience and Problem Format Affect Probabilistic Reasoning Through Interaction Analysis |
Q24802065 | Explaining computation of predictive values: 2 x 2 table versus frequency tree. A randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN74278823] |
Q53458334 | Facilitating informed choice in prenatal testing: how well are we doing? |
Q52106795 | Facilitating normative judgments of conditional probability: frequency or nested sets? |
Q51948175 | Frequency format facilitates reasoning in simple numerical tasks. |
Q30317591 | GRADE guidelines: 12. Developing Summary of Findings tables - dichotomous outcomes |
Q81433622 | Guest editorial |
Q35557031 | Helping patients decide: ten steps to better risk communication |
Q33461796 | How should risk be communicated to children: a cross-sectional study comparing different formats of probability information. |
Q36495120 | How to foster citizens' statistical reasoning: implications for genetic counseling. |
Q26798239 | How well do health professionals interpret diagnostic information? A systematic review |
Q27345953 | Hypothetical Outcome Plots Outperform Error Bars and Violin Plots for Inferences about Reliability of Variable Ordering |
Q37224629 | If children understand drawing straws and flipping coins, research participants can understand randomization |
Q50044023 | Implantable cardioverter defibrillators in the context of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a lesson in patient autonomy. |
Q59295900 | Improving Stock-Flow Reasoning With Verbal Formats |
Q52942711 | Improving doctor-patient understanding of probability in communicating cancer-screening test findings. |
Q44938603 | Improving public interpretation of probabilistic test results: distributive evaluations |
Q43888330 | Insensitivity and oversensitivity to answer diagnosticity in hypothesis testing |
Q35314104 | Instruction in information structuring improves Bayesian judgment in intelligence analysts |
Q33675507 | Interpretation of evidence in data by untrained medical students: a scenario-based study |
Q33561085 | Interventions to Improve Care for Patients with Limited Health Literacy. |
Q80571048 | Intuitive t tests: lay use of statistical information |
Q34354172 | Measuring patients' preferences for treatment and perceptions of risk |
Q39872627 | Natural Frequencies Do Not Foster Public Understanding of Medical Test Results |
Q35763832 | Natural frequencies facilitate diagnostic inferences of managers |
Q51857094 | Natural frequencies help older adults and people with low numeracy to evaluate medical screening tests. |
Q36157899 | Natural frequencies improve Bayesian reasoning in simple and complex inference tasks |
Q57177673 | Numeracy and Understanding of Quantitative Aspects of Predictive Models: A Pilot Study |
Q33436392 | Optimizing the use of patient data to improve outcomes for patients: narcotics for chronic noncancer pain |
Q46084960 | Outcomes of screening to prevent cancer: Authors' reply |
Q39137909 | Pitfalls of counterfactual thinking in medical practice: preventing errors by using more functional reference points |
Q99726890 | Quantitative examination of video-recorded NHS Health Checks: comparison of the use of QRISK2 versus JBS3 cardiovascular risk calculators |
Q35612833 | Reasons for ordering spinal x-ray investigations: how they influence general practitioners' management |
Q51967791 | Reducing the influence of anecdotal reasoning on people's health care decisions: is a picture worth a thousand statistics? |
Q34117117 | Reviewing intuitive decision-making and uncertainty: the implications for medical education |
Q38705644 | Risk communication in the dental practice |
Q35133542 | Risk communication methods in hip fracture prevention: a randomised trial in primary care |
Q36037510 | Simple tools for understanding risks: from innumeracy to insight |
Q56785555 | Statistical illiteracy undermines informed shared decision making |
Q93190413 | Study protocol: Randomized controlled trial of web-based decision support tools for high-risk women and healthcare providers to increase breast cancer chemoprevention |
Q34354798 | Teaching methods in Hawler College of Medicine in Iraq: a qualitative assessment from teachers' perspectives |
Q47266468 | The Barrier to Informed Choice in Cancer Screening: Statistical Illiteracy in Physicians and Patients |
Q37580461 | The Impact of Visualizing Nested Sets. An Empirical Study on Tree Diagrams and Unit Squares |
Q99631329 | The Interpretation of SARS-CoV-2 Diagnostic Tests |
Q34080171 | The cognitive imperative: thinking about how we think |
Q28475969 | The effect of alternative summary statistics for communicating risk reduction on decisions about taking statins: a randomized trial |
Q51697729 | The effect of graphical and numerical presentation of hypothetical prenatal diagnosis results on risk perception. |
Q53084663 | The effects of absolute risks, relative risks, frequencies, and probabilities on decision quality. |
Q36840606 | The ethics of information: absolute risk reduction and patient understanding of screening |
Q35820273 | The risk of death by age, sex, and smoking status in the United States: putting health risks in context |
Q35912944 | Toward an ecological analysis of Bayesian inferences: how task characteristics influence responses |
Q59334965 | US gynecologists' estimates and beliefs regarding ovarian cancer screening's effectiveness 5 years after release of the PLCO evidence |
Q44982844 | Urologists' referral attitude for sacral neuromodulation for treating refractory idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome: discrete choice experiment |
Q24235966 | Using alternative statistical formats for presenting risks and risk reductions |
Q24243789 | Using different statistical formats for presenting health information |
Q45821481 | Using tree diagrams without numerical values in addition to relative numbers improves students' numeracy skills: a randomized study in medical education |
Q90311976 | Vaccine skepticism reflects basic cognitive differences in mortality-related event frequency estimation |
Q33355873 | Vignette studies of medical choice and judgement to study caregivers' medical decision behaviour: systematic review |
Q37827925 | Visions of rationality |
Q35856951 | Visual aids improve diagnostic inferences and metacognitive judgment calibration |
Q54247459 | Visualizing the Bayesian 2-test case: The effect of tree diagrams on medical decision making. |
Q35751200 | What are the chances? Evaluating risk and benefit information in consumer health materials |
Q60927268 | What do European women know about their female cancer risks and cancer screening? A cross-sectional online intervention survey in five European countries |
Q52912807 | [Medical risk assessment--using the example of cancer screening]. |
Search more.