[GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence: publication bias].

scientific article published on 3 November 2012

[GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence: publication bias]. is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1016/J.ZEFQ.2012.10.015
P698PubMed publication ID23200211

P50authorHolger SchünemannQ28039195
Gerald GartlehnerQ28320342
Joerg J MeerpohlQ38323848
P2093author name stringGero Langer
Alexandra Nolting
Matthias Perleth
Angela Kaminski-Hartenthaler
P2860cites workWhy most published research findings are falseQ21092395
Local literature bias in genetic epidemiology: an empirical evaluation of the Chinese literatureQ21563436
Selective Publication of Antidepressant Trials and Its Influence on Apparent EfficacyQ23791313
Grey literature in meta-analyses of randomized trials of health care interventionsQ24245582
Time to publication for results of clinical trialsQ24245587
Misleading data analyses in salmeterol (SMART) studyQ46743806
The Salmeterol Multicenter Asthma Research Trial: a comparison of usual pharmacotherapy for asthma or usual pharmacotherapy plus salmeterolQ46902379
In an empirical evaluation of the funnel plot, researchers could not visually identify publication bias.Q51967379
Publication bias and dissemination of clinical research.Q52867734
Fair conduct and fair reporting of clinical trials.Q52916957
Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study.Q52938193
Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German.Q53358085
Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.Q55038991
Estimating Effect Size Under Publication Bias: Small Sample Properties and Robustness of a Random Effects Selection ModelQ56289277
Clinical Trial Registration — Looking Back and Moving AheadQ57247896
Publication Bias: A Problem in Interpreting Medical DataQ63018176
Effect of the statistical significance of results on the time to completion and publication of randomized efficacy trialsQ74121809
Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic reviewQ24673248
The case of the misleading funnel plotQ24676535
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical testQ24685585
Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case studyQ24685600
Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication biasQ27860653
Different patterns of duplicate publication: an analysis of articles used in systematic reviewsQ28246722
Reporting bias in drug trials submitted to the Food and Drug Administration: review of publication and presentationQ28474127
Publication bias in clinical researchQ29541186
Recursive cumulative meta-analysis: a diagnostic for the evolution of total randomized evidence from group and individual patient dataQ30574153
Quinine for nocturnal leg cramps: a meta-analysis including unpublished dataQ32013656
Systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variablesQ33806488
WHO facilitates international collaboration in setting standards for clinical trial registrationQ34422418
Meta-analysis of flavonoids for the treatment of haemorrhoids.Q34532242
Evidence b(i)ased medicine--selective reporting from studies sponsored by pharmaceutical industry: review of studies in new drug applicationsQ34534086
Meta-analyses of therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis. II. Meta-analysis of alendronate for the treatment of postmenopausal womenQ34803284
Bias in reporting clinical trialsQ35802548
Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projectsQ36246225
N-acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: publication bias perpetuated by meta-analysesQ36713709
Factors influencing publication of research results. Follow-up of applications submitted to two institutional review boardsQ36728722
Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetryQ37185996
Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses.Q38630464
Large trials vs meta-analysis of smaller trials: how do their results compare?Q40923138
Bias in location and selection of studiesQ41694445
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Asymmetry detected in funnel plot was probably due to true heterogeneityQ43149749
Controversies surround heart drug study: questions about Vytorin and trial sponsors' conductQ46722606
P433issue9
P407language of work or nameGermanQ188
P921main subjectbiasQ742736
P304page(s)670-676
P577publication date2012-11-03
P1433published inZeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im GesundheitswesenQ186664
P1476title[GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence: publication bias].
P478volume106

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q35594793Comparative effectiveness and safety of screening and counselling interventions conducted by non-physicians and physicians: a systematic review
Q30317591GRADE guidelines: 12. Developing Summary of Findings tables - dichotomous outcomes
Q30317182GRADE guidelines: 13. Preparing Summary of Findings tables and evidence profiles - continuous outcomes
Q37496567Prognostic value of p53 mutation for poor outcome of Asian primary liver cancer patients: evidence from a cohort study and meta-analysis of 988 patients
Q90181729[GRADE equity guidelines 1: Considering health equity in GRADE guideline development - introduction and rationale]
Q92533019[GRADE: Using evidence to decision frameworks for adoption, adaptation and de novo generation of trustworthy guideline recommendations - GRADE-ADOLOPMENT]

Search more.