Impact of asymmetry on measurements of the aortic root using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with a bicuspid aortic valve.

scientific article

Impact of asymmetry on measurements of the aortic root using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with a bicuspid aortic valve. is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1007/S10554-013-0268-9
P698PubMed publication ID23907165
P5875ResearchGate publication ID254265209

P50authorTimothy J BradleyQ61313170
Bernd J WinterspergerQ91637942
P2093author name stringRachel M Wald
Candice K Silversides
Jack M Colman
Andrew M Crean
Felipe S Torres
Ravi Menezes
Jonathan D Windram
P2860cites work???Q28255148
Recommendations for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in adults with congenital heart disease from the respective working groups of the European Society of CardiologyQ30482226
2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with thoracic aortic disease. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice GuideliQ34107875
Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): Consensus Panel reportQ34364464
Bicuspid stenotic aortic valves: clinical characteristics and morphological assessment using MRI and echocardiographyQ34619369
Outcomes in adults with bicuspid aortic valvesQ34829950
The bicuspid aortic valveQ36243546
Thoracic aortic aneurysm syndrome in childrenQ37132098
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for valvular heart disease: technique and validationQ37378319
Surgical treatment of ascending aorta and aortic root aneurysmsQ37708605
Bicuspid aortic valve diseaseQ37767783
CT and MRI assessment of the aortic root and ascending aortaQ38108812
Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012).Q40276570
Yearly rupture or dissection rates for thoracic aortic aneurysms: simple prediction based on sizeQ47193516
Comparing imaging modalities for screening aortic complications in patients with bicuspid aortic valveQ47632121
Ascending aortic diameters in congenital aortic stenosis: cardiac magnetic resonance versus transthoracic echocardiography.Q53112372
Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of EchocardioQ57217547
A classification system for the bicuspid aortic valve from 304 surgical specimensQ80234887
Accuracy of thoracic aortic measurements assessed by contrast enhanced and unenhanced magnetic resonance imagingQ83395227
Aortic root measurement by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: specification of planes and lines of measurement and corresponding normal valuesQ84647674
P433issue8
P304page(s)1769-1777
P577publication date2013-08-02
P1433published inThe International Journal of Cardiovascular ImagingQ2211095
P1476titleImpact of asymmetry on measurements of the aortic root using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with a bicuspid aortic valve
P478volume29

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q40736734Aortic Measurements in Patients with Aortopathy are Larger and More Reproducible by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Compared with Echocardiography
Q38200938Cardiovascular imaging 2013 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
Q40048424Diagnostic accuracy study of routine echocardiography for bicuspid aortic valve: a retrospective study and meta-analysis