scholarly article | Q13442814 |
review article | Q7318358 |
P6179 | Dimensions Publication ID | 1103408659 |
P356 | DOI | 10.1186/S12874-018-0490-1 |
P2888 | exact match | https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1186/s12874-018-0490-1 |
P932 | PMC publication ID | 5905138 |
P698 | PubMed publication ID | 29665780 |
P50 | author | Michael Höfler | Q88389366 |
P2093 | author name string | Robert Miller | |
Sebastian Trautmann | |||
John Venz | |||
P2860 | cites work | How to Craft a Strong Discussion Section | Q87727934 |
The Bradford Hill considerations on causality: a counterfactual perspective | Q21245024 | ||
The extent and consequences of p-hacking in science | Q24288794 | ||
Increasing disparities between resource inputs and outcomes, as measured by certain health deliverables, in biomedical research | Q24289253 | ||
CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials | Q24614759 | ||
Epidemiologic measures and policy formulation: lessons from potential outcomes | Q24815102 | ||
Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations | Q27316649 | ||
Bayesian perspectives for epidemiologic research: III. Bias analysis via missing-data methods | Q33501881 | ||
Causation of bias: the episcope | Q34118854 | ||
The effect of misclassification on the estimation of association: a review. | Q36263371 | ||
Depression and cancer risk: a register-based study of patients hospitalized with affective disorders, Denmark, 1969-1993. | Q38488991 | ||
Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing | Q41379048 | ||
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies | Q42591767 | ||
The case for structuring the discussion of scientific papers | Q42762158 | ||
The function of the discussion section in academic medical writing | Q42767194 | ||
Good practices for quantitative bias analysis | Q44407860 | ||
Bias, prevalence and kappa | Q45211420 | ||
Bayesian perspectives for epidemiological research: I. Foundations and basic methods | Q46868017 | ||
Invited Commentary: The Need for Cognitive Science in Methodology | Q47319352 | ||
The Discussion Section Tells Us Where We Are. | Q48349478 | ||
P275 | copyright license | Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International | Q20007257 |
P6216 | copyright status | copyrighted | Q50423863 |
P433 | issue | 1 | |
P921 | main subject | statistics | Q12483 |
medical research | Q2752427 | ||
biomedical investigative technique | Q66648976 | ||
P304 | page(s) | 34 | |
P577 | publication date | 2018-04-17 | |
P1433 | published in | BMC Medical Research Methodology | Q15752152 |
P1476 | title | Writing a discussion section: how to integrate substantive and statistical expertise | |
P478 | volume | 18 |
Q93186497 | The Principles of Biomedical Scientific Writing: Discussion | cites work | P2860 |
Search more.