Defect type, localization and marker gene expression determines early adverse events of matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation.

scientific article published in October 2015

Defect type, localization and marker gene expression determines early adverse events of matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation. is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1016/S0020-1383(15)30012-7
P698PubMed publication ID26542862

P2093author name stringDirk Albrecht
Peter Angele
Johannes Zellner
Jason Koh
Juergen Fritz
P2860cites workRepair of large chondral defects of the knee with autologous chondrocyte implantation in patients 45 years or olderQ81824720
Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation versus microfracture in the treatment of cartilage defects of the knee: a 2-year randomised studyQ82455832
Autologous chondrocyte implantation: a long-term follow-upQ83022840
Remodeling of articular cartilage and subchondral bone after bone grafting and matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation for osteochondritis dissecans of the kneeQ83070372
Two- to 9-year outcome after autologous chondrocyte transplantation of the kneeQ28144816
Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantationQ28247673
Results 2 Years After Matrix-Associated Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation Using the Novocart 3D Scaffold: An Analysis of Clinical and Radiological Data.Q30818691
Autologous chondrocyte implantation compared with microfracture in the knee. A randomized trial.Q34302678
Intravenous administration of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor humanized monoclonal antibody bevacizumab improves articular cartilage repairQ34346264
A prospective, randomised study comparing two techniques of autologous chondrocyte implantation for osteochondral defects in the knee: Periosteum covered versus type I/III collagen coveredQ34518529
Reoperation after autologous chondrocyte implantation. Indications and findingsQ35717000
Comparison of marker gene expression in chondrocytes from patients receiving autologous chondrocyte transplantation versus osteoarthritis patientsQ36392260
Is the transplant quality at the time of surgery adequate for matrix-guided autologous cartilage transplantation? A pilot studyQ37072306
The John Insall Award: A minimum 10-year outcome study of autologous chondrocyte implantationQ37469062
Failures, re-operations, and complications after autologous chondrocyte implantation--a systematic review.Q37844789
Mechanisms and targets of angiogenesis and nerve growth in osteoarthritis.Q38013959
Treatment and Prevention of (Early) Osteoarthritis Using Articular Cartilage Repair-Fact or Fiction? A Systematic ReviewQ38526254
Graft hypertrophy of matrix-based autologous chondrocyte implantation: a two-year follow-up study of NOVOCART 3D implantation in the kneeQ43539441
Pronounced biomaterial dependency in cartilage regeneration using nonexpanded compared with expanded chondrocytesQ43586499
Influence of cell differentiation and IL-1β expression on clinical outcomes after matrix-associated chondrocyte transplantationQ44934910
A prospective study of autologous chondrocyte implantation in patients with failed prior treatment for articular cartilage defect of the knee: results of the Study of the Treatment of Articular Repair (STAR) clinical trialQ44942229
Articular cartilage defects in the knee--basics, therapies and resultsQ47683203
Autologous chondrocyte implantation in children and adolescentsQ47818362
Analysis of the autologous chondrocyte quality of matrix-based autologous chondrocyte implantation in the knee jointQ49021813
Revision surgery after third generation autologous chondrocyte implantation in the kneeQ49077175
Tibial plateau lesions. Surface reconstruction with a biomimetic osteochondral scaffold: Results at 2 years of follow-up.Q51072256
Autologous chondrocyte implantation: natural history of postimplantation periosteal hypertrophy and effects of repair-site debridement on outcome.Q51095481
Magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) for the evaluation of autologous chondrocyte transplantation: determination of interobserver variability and correlation to clinical outcome after 2 years.Q51344391
Autologous chondrocyte implantation for treatment of focal cartilage defects in patients age 40 years and older: A matched-pair analysis with 2-year follow-up.Q51662621
Influence of cell quality on clinical outcome after autologous chondrocyte implantation.Q53139658
The incidence and clinical relevance of graft hypertrophy after matrix-based autologous chondrocyte implantation.Q53143120
Is microfracture of chondral defects in the knee associated with different results in patients aged 40 years or younger?Q53247254
Injury patterns of medial patellofemoral ligament and correlation analysis with articular cartilage lesions of the lateral femoral condyle after acute lateral patellar dislocation in children and adolescents: An MRI evaluation.Q53601052
Autologous chondrocyte implantation in the patella: a multicenter experienceQ56770412
A correlation between the timing of biopsy after autologous chondrocyte implantation and the histological appearanceQ57572795
The influence of scaffold architecture on chondrocyte distribution and behavior in matrix-associated chondrocyte transplantation graftsQ58835658
Minimum ten-year results of a prospective randomised study of autologous chondrocyte implantation versus mosaicplasty for symptomatic articular cartilage lesions of the kneeQ60194088
Treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation: results at two to ten yearsQ73331063
Autologous chondrocyte implantation for focal chondral defects of the kneeQ74625586
[Significance and technique of autologous chondrocyte transplantation]Q81069113
P304page(s)S2-9
P577publication date2015-10-01
P1433published inInjuryQ15752765
P1476titleDefect type, localization and marker gene expression determines early adverse events of matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation.
P478volume46 Suppl 4