scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P50 | author | John J Galvin | Q107154513 |
Deniz Başkent | Q54861059 | ||
P2093 | author name string | Bert Maat | |
Rolien H Free | |||
Christina D Fuller | |||
P2860 | cites work | Influence of musical training on understanding voiced and whispered speech in noise | Q27326715 |
Discrimination training of phonemic contrasts enhances phonological processing in mainstream school children | Q28250991 | ||
Musical backgrounds, listening habits, and aesthetic enjoyment of adult cochlear implant recipients. | Q30327173 | ||
Effects of training on timbre recognition and appraisal by postlingually deafened cochlear implant recipients. | Q30330090 | ||
The Effects of Music Therapy on the Quality and Length of Life of People Diagnosed with Terminal Cancer | Q30335780 | ||
Decoding speech prosody: do music lessons help? | Q30341067 | ||
Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing. | Q30341157 | ||
Music perception with cochlear implants: a review. | Q30343989 | ||
Brain organization for music processing. | Q30350182 | ||
Can nonlinguistic musical training change the way the brain processes speech? The expanded OPERA hypothesis. | Q30353798 | ||
Enhanced syllable discrimination thresholds in musicians | Q30356862 | ||
Melodic contour identification by cochlear implant listeners | Q30361482 | ||
Musicians detect pitch violation in a foreign language better than nonmusicians: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. | Q30363567 | ||
The musician effect: does it persist under degraded pitch conditions of cochlear implant simulations? | Q30365218 | ||
Influence of musical expertise and musical training on pitch processing in music and language. | Q30365233 | ||
Benefits of music training in mandarin-speaking pediatric cochlear implant users. | Q30367876 | ||
Development and application of a health-related quality-of-life instrument for adults with cochlear implants: The Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire | Q59848029 | ||
Maximizing cochlear implant patients' performance with advanced speech training procedures | Q30367937 | ||
Training of cochlear implant users to improve pitch perception in the presence of competing place cues. | Q30367944 | ||
Musical perception and enjoyment in post-lingual patients with cochlear implants | Q30369563 | ||
Music perception in cochlear implant users and its relationship with psychophysical capabilities | Q30372266 | ||
Music perception, pitch, and the auditory system. | Q30372333 | ||
Effects of live music therapy sessions on quality of life indicators, medications administered and hospital length of stay for patients undergoing elective surgical procedures for brain. | Q30373021 | ||
Effect of instrument timbre on melodic contour identification by cochlear implant users. | Q30373762 | ||
Normal-Hearing Listeners' and Cochlear Implant Users' Perception of Pitch Cues in Emotional Speech | Q30374308 | ||
Music therapy as specific and complementary training for adults after cochlear implantation: A pilot study. | Q30375357 | ||
Executive Function, Visual Attention and the Cocktail Party Problem in Musicians and Non-Musicians. | Q30378769 | ||
Melodic contour identification and music perception by cochlear implant users. | Q30379812 | ||
Melodic Contour Training and Its Effect on Speech in Noise, Consonant Discrimination, and Prosody Perception for Cochlear Implant Recipients. | Q30380600 | ||
A preliminary report of music-based training for adult cochlear implant users: Rationales and development. | Q30381290 | ||
Music perception of cochlear implant users: a questionnaire, and its implications for a music training program. | Q30385576 | ||
Why would Musical Training Benefit the Neural Encoding of Speech? The OPERA Hypothesis | Q30404674 | ||
Characteristics and determinants of music appreciation in adult CI users | Q30406042 | ||
Musical training, individual differences and the cocktail party problem | Q30408175 | ||
Vocal emotion recognition by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users | Q30425039 | ||
MUSIC APPRECIATION AND TRAINING FOR COCHLEAR IMPLANT RECIPIENTS: A REVIEW. | Q30427811 | ||
The Effects of Training on Recognition of Musical Instruments by Adults with Cochlear Implants | Q30428362 | ||
Technological, biological, and acoustical constraints to music perception in cochlear implant users | Q30430354 | ||
Music and quality of life in early-deafened late-implanted adult cochlear implant users. | Q30432682 | ||
Computer-Assisted Speech Training for Cochlear Implant Patients: Feasibility, Outcomes, and Future Directions | Q30446904 | ||
Digit training in noise can improve cochlear implant users' speech understanding in noise | Q30464069 | ||
Perceptual learning of spectrally degraded speech and environmental sounds | Q30469572 | ||
Concurrent-vowel and tone recognition by Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users | Q30479315 | ||
Effect of a competing instrument on melodic contour identification by cochlear implant users | Q30487896 | ||
Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception | Q30496648 | ||
Ontogenetic features of the psychophysiological mechanisms of perception of the emotional component of speech in musically gifted children | Q30541655 | ||
Superior voice timbre processing in musicians | Q30541973 | ||
Accuracy of cochlear implant recipients on pitch perception, melody recognition, and speech reception in noise | Q30542502 | ||
Listening to musical rhythms recruits motor regions of the brain | Q30543696 | ||
Musician enhancement for speech-in-noise | Q30545730 | ||
Musical experience and the aging auditory system: implications for cognitive abilities and hearing speech in noise | Q30555785 | ||
The OPERA hypothesis: assumptions and clarifications | Q30557618 | ||
Musical training as a framework for brain plasticity: behavior, function, and structure | Q30558285 | ||
Musicians and non-musicians are equally adept at perceiving masked speech | Q30564837 | ||
Musician advantage for speech-on-speech perception. | Q30570864 | ||
Voice emotion perception and production in cochlear implant users | Q30572196 | ||
Musicians experience less age-related decline in central auditory processing | Q34016949 | ||
The number of spectral channels required for speech recognition depends on the difficulty of the listening situation | Q35818262 | ||
Vocoder Simulations Explain Complex Pitch Perception Limitations Experienced by Cochlear Implant Users. | Q38667068 | ||
Acoustic profiles in vocal emotion expression | Q39432254 | ||
ICRA noises: artificial noise signals with speech-like spectral and temporal properties for hearing instrument assessment. International Collegium for Rehabilitative Audiology. | Q39574226 | ||
Quality of life assessment in advanced cancer | Q41225959 | ||
Musicians do not benefit from differences in fundamental frequency when listening to speech in competing speech backgrounds. | Q42282639 | ||
The effects of short-term computerized speech-in-noise training on postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant recipients. | Q43486937 | ||
Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants: an update with 2251 patients. | Q43842713 | ||
Modeling the perception of concurrent vowels: vowels with different fundamental frequencies | Q45152232 | ||
Learning and generalization of auditory temporal-interval discrimination in humans | Q46066741 | ||
Similar abilities of musicians and non-musicians to segregate voices by fundamental frequency | Q46491674 | ||
Perceptual adaptation to gender and expressive properties in speech: the role of fundamental frequency | Q46814403 | ||
The Effects of Musical Training on Speech Detection in the Presence of Informational and Energetic Masking | Q47096805 | ||
Comparison of word-, sentence-, and phoneme-based training strategies in improving the perception of spectrally distorted speech | Q47816997 | ||
Effectiveness of computer-based auditory training for adult users of cochlear implants. | Q50438375 | ||
Effectiveness of computer-based auditory training in improving the perception of noise-vocoded speech. | Q50457245 | ||
Auditory frequency discrimination learning is affected by stimulus variability. | Q50470849 | ||
Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. | Q50517986 | ||
Intelligibility of Dutch CVC syllables and sentences for listeners with normal hearing and with three types of hearing impairment. | Q50518325 | ||
Speech‐reception threshold for sentences as a function of age and noise level | Q50609451 | ||
Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers. | Q54339337 | ||
P921 | main subject | cochlear implant | Q724965 |
P304 | page(s) | 2331216518765379 | |
P577 | publication date | 2018-01-01 | |
P1433 | published in | Trends in hearing | Q27725724 |
P1476 | title | Comparison of Two Music Training Approaches on Music and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users. | |
P478 | volume | 22 |