| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P356 | DOI | 10.1111/LCRP.12097 |
| P50 | author | Annelies Vredeveldt | Q55685927 |
| P2093 | author name string | Peter J. van Koppen | |
| Juliette E. Ampt | |||
| Robin N. Groen | |||
| P2860 | cites work | The nature of real, implanted, and fabricated memories for emotional childhood events: implications for the recovered memory debate | Q33874113 |
| Why two heads apart are better than two heads together: multiple mechanisms underlie the collaborative inhibition effect in memory | Q35024093 | ||
| Collaborative Memory: Cognitive Research and Theory | Q38544827 | ||
| Collaborative remembering of emotional events: the case of Rabin's assassination | Q42678408 | ||
| Shared encoding and the costs and benefits of collaborative recall | Q44749584 | ||
| Collective memory: collaborative and individual processes in remembering | Q46065149 | ||
| Postincident conferring by law enforcement officers: determining the impact of team discussions on statement content, accuracy, and officer beliefs | Q47561117 | ||
| Collaborative recall of details of an emotional film | Q47904322 | ||
| Eye closure helps memory by reducing cognitive load and enhancing visualisation | Q48691853 | ||
| Acknowledge, repeat, rephrase, elaborate: Witnesses can help each other remember more. | Q50568636 | ||
| Constructing rich false memories of committing crime. | Q50601480 | ||
| Speaking is silver, writing is golden? The role of cognitive and social factors in written versus spoken witness accounts. | Q50656260 | ||
| Consensus collaboration enhances group and individual recall accuracy. | Q50786154 | ||
| Written vs. spoken eyewitness accounts: does modality of testing matter? | Q50987207 | ||
| The influence of learning methods on collaboration: prior repeated retrieval enhances retrieval organization, abolishes collaborative inhibition, and promotes post-collaborative memory. | Q51790405 | ||
| Influence of re-exposure and retrieval disruption during group collaboration on later individual recall. | Q51893041 | ||
| Training mothers in elaborative reminiscing enhances children's autobiographical memory and narrative. | Q51901231 | ||
| Does test delay eliminate collaborative inhibition? | Q51932912 | ||
| Expertise promotes facilitation on a collaborative memory task. | Q51944035 | ||
| You say tomato? Collaborative remembering leads to more false memories for intimate couples than for strangers. | Q51962528 | ||
| Explorations in the social contagion of memory. | Q52008634 | ||
| Social contagion of memory. | Q52018192 | ||
| Collaboration in recall: do pairs of people cross-cue each other to produce new memories? | Q52018837 | ||
| Memory conformity: exploring misinformation effects when presented by another person. | Q52026768 | ||
| A Computer Network Model of Human Transactive Memory | Q56004107 | ||
| Memory conformity: can eyewitnesses influence each other's memories for an event? | Q56610511 | ||
| Co-Witnesses, Confederates, and Conformity: Effects of Discussion and Delay on Eyewitness Memory | Q57310274 | ||
| Memory conformity: Disentangling the steps toward influence during a discussion | Q57981600 | ||
| P433 | issue | 2 | |
| P304 | page(s) | 242-259 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2016-06-24 | |
| P1433 | published in | Legal and Criminological Psychology | Q15801082 |
| P1476 | title | When discussion between eyewitnesses helps memory | |
| P478 | volume | 22 |
Search more.