Should We Use the IMPACT-Model for the Outcome Prognostication of TBI Patients? A Qualitative Study Assessing Physicians' Perceptions

article

Should We Use the IMPACT-Model for the Outcome Prognostication of TBI Patients? A Qualitative Study Assessing Physicians' Perceptions is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1177/2381468318757987
P932PMC publication ID6124938
P698PubMed publication ID30288437

P50authorKathleen M MazorQ87419697
P2093author name stringRobert Goldberg
Lori Shutter
Susanne Muehlschlegel
Thomas Quinn
Nananda Col
Jesse Moskowitz
Muhammad W Khan
P2860cites workDecision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisionsQ24200969
A theory of medical decision making and health: fuzzy trace theoryQ24651866
Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus processQ24672424
A universal decision support system. Addressing the decision-making needs of patients, families, and clinicians in the setting of critical illnessQ28653090
Theorizing about causes at the individual level while estimating effects at the population level: implications for prevention.Q30349873
A randomized trial of two methods to disclose prognosis to surrogate decision makers in intensive care unitsQ30497236
Development and usability testing of a Web-based decision aid for families of patients receiving prolonged mechanical ventilationQ30635535
Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and international validation of prognostic scores based on admission characteristics.Q33358264
Standardisation of data collection in traumatic brain injury: key to the future?Q33522321
Common data elements for traumatic brain injury: recommendations from the interagency working group on demographics and clinical assessmentQ33736398
Transforming research and clinical knowledge in traumatic brain injury pilot: multicenter implementation of the common data elements for traumatic brain injury.Q34788054
Mortality associated with withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy for patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a Canadian multicentre cohort studyQ35255462
Prediction of outcome after moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: external validation of the International Mission on Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials (IMPACT) and Corticoid Randomisation After Significant Head injury (CRASH) prognostQ35910757
"It's not just what the doctor tells me:" factors that influence surrogate decision-makers' perceptions of prognosisQ36490525
Surrogate decision makers' interpretation of prognostic information: a mixed-methods studyQ36490537
Clinician judgment vs formal scales for predicting intracerebral hemorrhage outcomesQ36516777
Shared Decision Making in ICUs: An American College of Critical Care Medicine and American Thoracic Society Policy StatementQ36677551
Decision Aids and Shared Decision-Making in Neurocritical Care: An Unmet Need in Our NeuroICUsQ36726226
Variability in physician prognosis and recommendations after intracerebral hemorrhageQ36918842
Communicating the uncertainty of harms and benefits of medical interventionsQ36943296
Theories of medical decision making and health: an evidence-based approachQ37045408
Clinical nihilism in neuroemergenciesQ37176741
Development and pilot testing of a decision aid for surrogates of patients with prolonged mechanical ventilationQ37304106
Early prognosis in traumatic brain injury: from prophecies to predictionsQ37732621
Recommendations for the use of common outcome measures in traumatic brain injury researchQ37806403
What Families Need and Physicians Deliver: Contrasting Communication Preferences Between Surrogate Decision-Makers and Physicians During Outcome Prognostication in Critically Ill TBI Patients.Q38661537
Clinical Results and Outcome Improvement Over Time in Traumatic Brain Injury.Q39947724
Multivariable prognostic analysis in traumatic brain injury: results from the IMPACT studyQ40231512
Frequency and impact of intensive care unit complications on moderate-severe traumatic brain injury: early results of the Outcome Prognostication in Traumatic Brain Injury (OPTIMISM) StudyQ40258582
What price perfection? Calibration and discrimination of clinical prediction modelsQ41127821
Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI): a prospective longitudinal observational studyQ41667852
The ICH score: a simple, reliable grading scale for intracerebral hemorrhageQ43503411
Self-fulfilling prophecies through withdrawal of care: do they exist in traumatic brain injury, too?Q44788506
External validation of the ICH scoreQ46620518
Determination of neurologic prognosis and clinical decision making in adult patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a survey of Canadian intensivists, neurosurgeons, and neurologistsQ48174755
Prognosticating after severe acute brain disease: science, art, and biasesQ48248123
Factors associated with the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a multicenter cohort studyQ48320266
Intracranial Pressure Rescued by Decompressive Surgery after Traumatic Brain InjuryQ48525942
Physicians' perceptions of the value of prognostic models: the benefits and risks of prognostic confidence.Q49249250
External validation of the CRASH and IMPACT prognostic models in severe traumatic brain injury.Q50718383
Prediction of functional outcome in patients with primary intracerebral hemorrhage: the FUNC scoreQ81461839
Scoring systems for the critically ill: use, misuse and abuseQ83194899
P433issue1
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P304page(s)2381468318757987
P1433published inMDM Policy & PracticeQ50817288
P1476titleShould We Use the IMPACT-Model for the Outcome Prognostication of TBI Patients? A Qualitative Study Assessing Physicians' Perceptions
P478volume3

Reverse relations

Q92329759Gap Analysis Regarding Prognostication in Neurocritical Care: A Joint Statement from the German Neurocritical Care Society and the Neurocritical Care Societycites workP2860

Search more.