scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P50 | author | Douglas G. Altman | Q5300242 |
Merrick Zwarenstein | Q29839001 | ||
Sean Tunis | Q91494600 | ||
Shaun Treweek | Q49649781 | ||
Andrew D. Oxman | Q65663128 | ||
Kevin Thorpe | Q71769844 | ||
P2093 | author name string | Curt D Furberg | |
Eduardo Bergel | |||
David J Magid | |||
Ian Harvey | |||
Kalipso Chalkidou | |||
P2860 | cites work | Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement | Q24602353 |
CLASP: a randomised trial of low-dose aspirin for the prevention and treatment of pre-eclampsia among 9364 pregnant women. CLASP (Collaborative Low-dose Aspirin Study in Pregnancy) Collaborative Group | Q72669570 | ||
Blind faith? The effects of promoting active sick leave for back pain patients: a cluster-randomized controlled trial | Q78599360 | ||
Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials | Q34220184 | ||
Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy | Q34264600 | ||
Beneficial Effect of Carotid Endarterectomy in Symptomatic Patients with High-Grade Carotid Stenosis | Q34784218 | ||
External validity of randomised controlled trials: "to whom do the results of this trial apply?". | Q36003704 | ||
A simple and valid tool distinguished efficacy from effectiveness studies | Q36596046 | ||
A clinical research strategy to support shared decision making | Q38459476 | ||
Randomised controlled trial of self-supervised and directly observed treatment of tuberculosis | Q46492075 | ||
Low-Dose Aspirin to Prevent Preeclampsia in Women at High Risk | Q61835495 | ||
P433 | issue | 10 | |
P407 | language of work or name | English | Q1860 |
P304 | page(s) | E47-57 | |
P577 | publication date | 2009-05-12 | |
P1433 | published in | Canadian Medical Association Journal | Q5030320 |
P1476 | title | A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers | |
P478 | volume | 180 |
Q63441154 | A Call for Theoretically Informed and Empirically Validated Military Family Interventions |
Q24282580 | A Framework for Enhancing the Value of Research for Dissemination and Implementation |
Q34474468 | A call for action: Comparative effectiveness research in asthma |
Q47839541 | A comparison of meta-analytic methods for synthesizing evidence from explanatory and pragmatic trials. |
Q58720557 | A dynamic application of PRECIS-2 to evaluate implementation in a pragmatic, cluster randomized clinical trial in two nursing home systems |
Q38191859 | A genetic counseling intervention to facilitate family communication about inherited conditions |
Q38603347 | A large cluster randomized trial of outcome-based pathways to improve home-based wound care. |
Q40286736 | A patient advocate to facilitate access and improve communication, care, and outcomes in adults with moderate or severe asthma: Rationale, design, and methods of a randomized controlled trial |
Q57694374 | A patient-centered, coordinated care approach delivered by community and pediatric primary care providers to promote responsive parenting: pragmatic randomized clinical trial rationale and protocol |
Q30525274 | A pragmatic cluster randomised trial evaluating three implementation interventions. |
Q37498856 | A pragmatic pilot randomized trial to investigate the effectiveness of behavioural activation group therapy in reducing depressive symptoms and improving quality of life in patients with depression: the BRAVE pilot trial protocol |
Q33618099 | A pragmatic, randomized, controlled study evaluating the impact of access to smoking cessation pharmacotherapy coverage on the proportion of successful quitters in a Canadian population of smokers motivated to quit (ACCESSATION). |
Q36626553 | A primary care-based interdisciplinary team approach to the treatment of chronic pain utilizing a pragmatic clinical trials framework |
Q37285642 | A process for Decision-making after Pilot and feasibility Trials (ADePT): development following a feasibility study of a complex intervention for pelvic organ prolapse |
Q36765281 | A protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial using the Health Teams Advancing Patient Experience: Strengthening Quality (Health TAPESTRY) platform approach to promote person-focused primary healthcare for older adults. |
Q47604032 | A randomized practical behavioural trial of curriculum-based advocacy training for individuals with traumatic brain injury and their families |
Q58657021 | A randomized pragmatic care trial on endovascular acute stroke interventions (EASI): criticisms, responses, and ethics of integrating research and clinical care |
Q35870553 | A randomized trial of Internet and telephone treatment for smoking cessation. |
Q36192079 | A randomized wait-list control trial to evaluate the impact of a mobile application to improve self-management of individuals with type 2 diabetes: a study protocol |
Q35044077 | A tall order on a tight timeframe: stakeholder perspectives on comparative effectiveness research using electronic clinical data |
Q34390834 | ASSIST applicability scoring of surgical trials. an investigator-reported assessment tool |
Q34768562 | Acceptance checklist for clinical effectiveness pilot trials: a systematic approach |
Q39018450 | Acupuncture versus usual care for postoperative nausea and vomiting in children after tonsillectomy/adenoidectomy: a pragmatic, multicentre, double-blinded, randomised trial. |
Q36299643 | Adherence to blood pressure telemonitoring in a cluster-randomized clinical trial |
Q34051864 | Advancing the field of pharmaceutical risk minimization through application of implementation science best practices |
Q41763663 | Against pragmatism: on efficacy, effectiveness and the real world |
Q39088169 | Aiming to Improve Readmissions Through InteGrated Hospital Transitions (AIRTIGHT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
Q33938682 | An equivalence evaluation of a nurse-moderated group-based internet support program for new mothers versus standard care: a pragmatic preference randomised controlled trial |
Q33735726 | An official American Thoracic Society research statement: comparative effectiveness research in pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine |
Q55089263 | Analytical Methods for a Learning Health System: 1. Framing the Research Question. |
Q36176170 | Applying the PRECIS criteria to describe three effectiveness trials of weight loss in obese patients with comorbid conditions |
Q35186098 | Approaches to Mixed Methods Dissemination and Implementation Research: Methods, Strengths, Caveats, and Opportunities |
Q47725816 | Approaches to economic evaluation in telemedicine. |
Q94069533 | Are trials of psychological and psychosocial interventions for schizophrenia and psychosis included in the NICE guidelines pragmatic? A systematic review |
Q33165520 | Assessment of a standardized algorithm for cardiac pacing in older patients affected by severe unpredictable reflex syncopes |
Q35109924 | Behavior matters |
Q35199021 | Behavioral medicine and the health of our nation: accelerating our impact |
Q34649332 | Bias due to lack of patient blinding in clinical trials. A systematic review of trials randomizing patients to blind and nonblind sub-studies |
Q56828560 | Bridging the efficacy–effectiveness gap: a regulator's perspective on addressing variability of drug response |
Q36748799 | Building useful evidence: changing the clinical research paradigm to account for comparative effectiveness research |
Q34626364 | Canadian-led capacity-building in biostatistics and methodology in cardiovascular and diabetes trials: the CANNeCTIN Biostatistics and Methodological Innovation Working Group |
Q34602399 | Centre selection for clinical trials and the generalisability of results: a mixed methods study |
Q90695931 | Challenges in Implementing Hospice Clinical Trials: Preserving Scientific Integrity While Facing Change |
Q37848176 | Clinical research on acupuncture - Concepts and guidance on efficacy and effectiveness research |
Q34498710 | Clinical trials in crisis: Four simple methodologic fixes |
Q24235738 | Combined chiropractic interventions for low-back pain |
Q39538503 | Commentary: How the debate about comparative effectiveness research should impact the future of clinical trials |
Q33833780 | Community-based recreational football: a novel approach to promote physical activity and quality of life in prostate cancer survivors. |
Q47701149 | Comparative Effectiveness Research in Pediatric Respiratory Disease: Promise and Pitfalls. |
Q36877560 | Comparative effectiveness of a complex Ayurvedic treatment and conventional standard care in osteoarthritis of the knee--study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
Q55267210 | Comparative effectiveness of pediatric integrative medicine as an adjunct to usual care for pediatric inpatients of a North American tertiary care centre: A study protocol for a pragmatic cluster controlled trial. |
Q36953584 | Comparative effectiveness research in cancer: what has been funded and what knowledge gaps remain? |
Q89627643 | Comparison of Integrated Outpatient Palliative Care With Standard Care in Patients With Parkinson Disease and Related Disorders: A Randomized Clinical Trial |
Q45073170 | Comparison of Outcomes of antibiotic Drugs and Appendectomy (CODA) trial: a protocol for the pragmatic randomised study of appendicitis treatment. |
Q38740964 | Comparison of blood pressure measurements using an automated blood pressure device in community pharmacies and family physicians' offices: a randomized controlled trial |
Q38375702 | Computed tomography versus invasive coronary angiography: design and methods of the pragmatic randomised multicentre DISCHARGE trial |
Q36173406 | Conducting rapid, relevant research: lessons learned from the My Own Health Report project |
Q35088946 | DO IT Trial: vitamin D Outcomes and Interventions in Toddlers - a TARGet Kids! randomized controlled trial |
Q34113962 | Design and methods of "diaBEAT-it!": a hybrid preference/randomized control trial design using the RE-AIM framework |
Q36958572 | Designing a valid randomized pragmatic primary care implementation trial: the my own health report (MOHR) project |
Q33713532 | Developing robust, sustainable, implementation systems using rigorous, rapid and relevant science |
Q26786579 | Differences between the real and the desired worlds in the results of clinical trials |
Q92658174 | Effect of Physical Activity Coaching on Acute Care and Survival Among Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial |
Q30152075 | Effect of Village Health Team Home Visits and Mobile Phone Consultations on Maternal and Newborn Care Practices in Masindi and Kiryandongo, Uganda: A Community-Intervention Trial |
Q33712367 | Effectiveness guidance document (EGD) for Chinese medicine trials: a consensus document |
Q27497185 | Effectiveness guidance document (EGD) for acupuncture research - a consensus document for conducting trials |
Q89502783 | Effectiveness of Intrapleural Tissue Plasminogen Activator and Dornase Alfa vs Tissue Plasminogen Activator Alone in Children with Pleural Empyema: A Randomized Clinical Trial |
Q57802130 | Effectiveness of a hospital-based postnatal parent education intervention about pain management during infant vaccination: a randomized controlled trial |
Q37291102 | Effectiveness of additional self-care acupressure for women with menstrual pain compared to usual care alone: using stakeholder engagement to design a pragmatic randomized trial and study protocol |
Q33442300 | Effectiveness of app-based relaxation for patients with chronic low back pain (Relaxback) and chronic neck pain (Relaxneck): study protocol for two randomized pragmatic trials |
Q42683010 | Effectiveness of pharmacist counseling combined with nicotine replacement therapy: a pragmatic randomized trial with 6,987 smokers |
Q50640927 | Effectiveness of primary care-public health collaborations in the delivery of influenza vaccine: a cluster-randomized pragmatic trial. |
Q61806930 | Effectiveness trials: critical data to help understand how respiratory medicines really work? |
Q37300935 | Efficacy and effectiveness trials have different goals, use different tools, and generate different messages. |
Q34144928 | Efficacy of a dual-ring wound protector for prevention of incisional surgical site infection after Whipple's procedure (pancreaticoduodenectomy) with preoperatively-placed intrabiliary stents: protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
Q60029605 | Ein Leitfaden zur Planung Nichtmedikamentöser klinischer Studien in der Primärversorgung unter Berücksichtigung der Kriterien der Guten Klinischen Praxis (GCP) |
Q26795700 | Enhancing the Evidence for Behavioral Counseling: A Perspective From the Society of Behavioral Medicine |
Q64229348 | Evaluating the Effectiveness of an App-Based Nurse-Moderated Program for New Mothers With Depression and Parenting Problems (eMums Plus): Protocol for a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial |
Q27302076 | Evaluating the QUIT-PRIMO clinical practice ePortal to increase smoker engagement with online cessation interventions: a national hybrid type 2 implementation study |
Q33650552 | Evaluation of a specialized yoga program for persons with a spinal cord injury: a pilot randomized controlled trial |
Q37426659 | Feedback GAP: pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial of goal setting and action plans to increase the effectiveness of audit and feedback interventions in primary care |
Q86827868 | Form follows function: pragmatic controlled trials (PCTs) have to answer different questions and require different designs than randomized controlled trials (RCTs) |
Q35996302 | Forty-five years of schizophrenia trials in Italy: a survey |
Q26769736 | Framework for Selecting Best Practices in Public Health: A Systematic Literature Review |
Q37991675 | Generalizability of systematic reviews of the effectiveness of health care interventions to primary health care: concepts, methods and future research |
Q35557500 | Health psychology in primary care: recent research and future directions |
Q38673896 | How can clinical practices pragmatically increase physical activity for patients with type 2 diabetes? A systematic review. |
Q31049424 | How well do randomized trials inform decision making: systematic review using comparative effectiveness research measures on acupuncture for back pain |
Q33826442 | Implementation and evaluation of the 5As framework of obesity management in primary care: design of the 5As Team (5AsT) randomized control trial |
Q34976014 | Implementation science in cancer prevention and control: a decade of grant funding by the National Cancer Institute and future directions |
Q50123001 | Improving Adherence to Smoking Cessation Treatment: Intervention Effects in a Web-Based Randomized Trial. |
Q55476462 | Improving Adherence to Smoking Cessation Treatment: Smoking Outcomes in a Web-based Randomized Trial. |
Q36689753 | Improving adherence to web-based cessation programs: a randomized controlled trial study protocol |
Q64900343 | Improving care for elderly patients living with polypharmacy: protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomized trial in community-based primary care practices in Canada. |
Q34477982 | Improving chronic disease prevention and screening in primary care: results of the BETTER pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial |
Q55434527 | Intermittent versus continuous oxygen saturation monitoring for infants hospitalised with bronchiolitis: study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. |
Q38123934 | International development of traditional medicine / complementary and alternative medicine research--what can Europe learn? |
Q36771158 | Internet-based randomized controlled trials: a systematic review |
Q35997412 | Lifetime physical activity and the incidence of proliferative benign breast disease |
Q28395941 | Lumbar Imaging With Reporting Of Epidemiology (LIRE)--Protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomized trial |
Q37108986 | Making clinical trials more relevant: improving and validating the PRECIS tool for matching trial design decisions to trial purpose |
Q37236900 | Making trials matter: pragmatic and explanatory trials and the problem of applicability |
Q30831751 | Measuring the implementation of a group-based Lifestyle-integrated Functional Exercise (Mi-LiFE) intervention delivered in primary care for older adults aged 75 years or older: a pilot feasibility study protocol |
Q63785358 | Models and Studies of Aging: Executive Summary of a Report from the U13 Conference Series |
Q36352858 | Multilevel research and the challenges of implementing genomic medicine |
Q27014802 | Multimorbidity and evidence generation |
Q34220909 | New research on childbirth has the potential to empower women's decision making, but more is needed |
Q61809157 | Obsessive-compulsive disorder and global mental health |
Q35318042 | Optimizing early child development for young children with non-anemic iron deficiency in the primary care practice setting (OptEC): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
Q38163039 | Optimizing the design of pragmatic trials: key issues remain |
Q34332733 | Outcomes of minimal and moderate support versions of an internet-based diabetes self-management support program |
Q40484642 | Patient navigation for lung cancer screening in an urban safety-net system: Protocol for a pragmatic randomized clinical trial |
Q30851487 | Patient-centered primary care for adults at high risk for AUDs: the Choosing Healthier Drinking Options In primary CarE (CHOICE) trial |
Q55057560 | Pharmacists as Interprofessional Collaborators and Leaders through Clinical Pathways. |
Q44681764 | Physicians declining patient enrollment in a critical care trial: a case study in thromboprophylaxis |
Q37260485 | Population-based outreach versus care as usual to prevent suicide attempt: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
Q55686325 | Population-based versus practice-based recall for childhood immunizations: a randomized controlled comparative effectiveness trial. |
Q50630891 | Pragmatic design in randomized controlled trials. |
Q91797920 | Principles and procedures for data and safety monitoring in pragmatic clinical trials |
Q35190084 | Problem solving to improve adherence and asthma outcomes in urban adults with moderate or severe asthma: a randomized controlled trial |
Q38951846 | Promoting HPV Vaccination in Safety-Net Clinics: A Randomized Trial |
Q91537532 | Promoting resilience in adolescents and young adults with cancer: Results from the PRISM randomized controlled trial |
Q37958047 | Protocol-driven costs in trial-based pharmacoeconomic analyses |
Q24202829 | Quetiapine versus typical antipsychotic medications for schizophrenia |
Q34550045 | Randomised controlled trials and clinical maternity care: moving on from intention-to-treat and other simplistic analyses of efficacy |
Q38571344 | Randomized controlled trials and neuro-oncology: should alternative designs be considered? |
Q38966154 | Rating of Included Trials on the Efficacy-Effectiveness Spectrum: development of a new tool for systematic reviews. |
Q85074141 | Reaiming RE-AIM: Using the Model to Plan, Implement, and Evaluate the Effects of Environmental Change Approaches to Enhancing Population Health |
Q35069842 | Remote source document verification in two national clinical trials networks: a pilot study |
Q36727211 | Research design issues for evaluating complex multicomponent interventions in neighborhoods and communities |
Q35846608 | Research designs for proof-of-concept chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations |
Q34696399 | Results of a pragmatic effectiveness-implementation hybrid trial of the Family Check-up in community mental health agencies |
Q92344418 | SPARX-R computerized therapy among adolescents in youth offenders' program: Step-wise cohort study |
Q28710019 | SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials |
Q47547063 | Short-course antimicrobial therapy for paediatric respiratory infections (SAFER): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
Q33166495 | Standardized algorithm for cardiac pacing in older patients affected by severe unpredictable reflex syncope: 3-year insights from the Syncope Unit Project 2 (SUP 2) study |
Q36352887 | State-of-the-art and future directions in multilevel interventions across the cancer control continuum |
Q36035063 | Study protocol: an evaluation of the effectiveness, experiences and costs of a patient-directed strategy compared with a multi-faceted strategy to implement physical cancer rehabilitation programmes for cancer survivors in a European healthcare syst |
Q34623588 | Systematic depression screening in high-risk patients attending primary care: a pragmatic cluster-randomized trial |
Q36034488 | Tackling the increasing complexity of CF care |
Q33535507 | Tai Chi for osteopenic women: design and rationale of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial |
Q57146236 | The "e" in cost-effectiveness analyses. A case study of omalizumab efficacy and effectiveness for cost-effectiveness analysis evidence |
Q91756002 | The 2018 ter Brugge Lecture: Problems with the Introduction of Innovations in Neurovascular Care |
Q57148920 | The BETTER WISE protocol: building on existing tools to improve cancer and chronic disease prevention and screening in primary care for wellness of cancer survivors and patients - a cluster randomized controlled trial embedded in a mixed methods desi |
Q37181369 | The E-Coach technology-assisted care transition system: a pragmatic randomized trial |
Q56895816 | The Global Alliance for Chronic Diseases Supports 15 Major Studies in Hypertension Prevention and Control in Low- and Middle-Income Countries |
Q37084628 | The HCV care continuum among people who use drugs: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
Q28658515 | The Origin and Impact of Ideals in eHealth Research: Experiences From the U-CARE Research Environment |
Q38833028 | The State of the Science on Sensory Factors and Their Impact on Daily Life for Children: A Scoping Review. |
Q47112316 | The application of PRECIS-2 ratings in randomized controlled trials of Chinese herbal medicine |
Q90663624 | The future of clinical trials in urological oncology |
Q38001037 | The role of comparative effectiveness research in transfusion medicine clinical trials: proceedings of a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute workshop |
Q33957854 | The role of pragmatic clinical trials in the evolution of learning health systems |
Q90472818 | The use of a risk assessment and decision support tool (CRISP) compared with usual care in general practice to increase risk-stratified colorectal cancer screening: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
Q47232823 | Treatment of Advanced Glaucoma Study: a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing primary medical treatment with primary trabeculectomy for people with newly diagnosed advanced glaucoma-study protocol. |
Q35658867 | Twelve-month outcomes of an Internet-based diabetes self-management support program |
Q55312450 | Understanding practice-based research participation: The differing motivations of engaged vs. non-engaged clinicians in pragmatic clinical trials. |
Q27347291 | Use of Video Decision Aids to Promote Advance Care Planning in Hilo, Hawai'i |
Q30717256 | Use of health plan combined with registry data to predict clinical trial recruitment. |
Q47256271 | User involvement in adolescents' mental healthcare: protocol for a systematic review |
Q36937067 | Using tablet computers compared to interactive voice response to improve subject recruitment in osteoporosis pragmatic clinical trials: feasibility, satisfaction, and sample size |
Q39103863 | Vasospasm: my first 25 years-what worked? what didn't? what next? |
Q47283865 | Weight loss among women and men in the ASPIRE-VA behavioral weight loss intervention trial. |
Q36287764 | Weight-loss and exercise for communities with arthritis in North Carolina (we-can): design and rationale of a pragmatic, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial |
Q34546633 | What can comparative effectiveness research contribute to integrative health in international perspective? |
Q45402244 | What does it mean to be pragmatic? Pragmatic methods, measures, and models to facilitate research translation |
Q38042386 | Which research is needed to support clinical decision-making on integrative medicine?- Can comparative effectiveness research close the gap? |
Search more.