scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P356 | DOI | 10.2307/2983402 |
P888 | JSTOR article ID | 2983402 |
P50 | author | Peter Donnelly | Q7173699 |
David J. Balding | Q10950480 | ||
P433 | issue | 1 | |
P407 | language of work or name | English | Q1860 |
P304 | page(s) | 21 | |
P577 | publication date | 1995-01-01 | |
P1433 | published in | Journal of the Royal Statistical Society | Q6296202 |
P1476 | title | Inference in Forensic Identification | |
P478 | volume | 158 |
Q79140950 | An extended likelihood ratio framework for interpreting evidence |
Q74291788 | Application of subpopulation theory to evaluation of DNA evidence |
Q73039052 | Applications and extensions of subpopulation theory: a caseworkers guide |
Q35205337 | DNA profiling: evaluation of the evidentiary value |
Q45878754 | Evaluation of DNA mixtures from database search |
Q36511456 | Identifying contributors of two-person DNA mixtures by familial database search |
Q53422209 | Logical implications of applying the principles of population genetics to the interpretation of DNA profiling evidence. |
Q52361245 | Match probability calculations for multi-locus DNA profiles |
Q74248717 | Motherless case in paternity testing |
Q52337019 | Nonindependence of matches at different loci in DNA profiles: quantifying the effect of close relatives on the match probability |
Q53676843 | Paternity determination when the alleged father's genotypes are unavailable. |
Q73744292 | Paternity probability when a relative of the father is an alleged father |
Q52263320 | Significant genetic correlations among Caucasians at forensic DNA loci. |
Q48385544 | The DNA database search controversy revisited: bridging the Bayesian-frequentist gap. |
Q52044829 | The DNA database search controversy. |
Q48221400 | The Evidential Value in the DNA Database Search Controversy and the Two‐Stain Problem |
Q57393140 | When can a DNA profile be regarded as unique? |
Search more.