| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P356 | DOI | 10.1212/01.WNL.0000238386.41398.30 |
| P698 | PubMed publication ID | 16966539 |
| P50 | author | Lex M. Bouter | Q38328273 |
| Raymond W Ostelo | Q56418720 | ||
| Patrick Bossuyt | Q59348768 | ||
| Anne Wilhelmina Saskia Rutjes | Q64685160 | ||
| P2093 | author name string | van der Windt DA | |
| de Vet HC | |||
| Reitsma JB | |||
| Smidt N | |||
| P433 | issue | 5 | |
| P407 | language of work or name | English | Q1860 |
| P921 | main subject | diagnosis | Q16644043 |
| P304 | page(s) | 792-797 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2006-09-01 | |
| P1433 | published in | Neurology | Q1161692 |
| P1476 | title | The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement: has it improved? | |
| P478 | volume | 67 |
| Q35786792 | A checklist to improve reporting of group-based behaviour-change interventions |
| Q38042164 | A critical evaluation of diagnostic methods used to identify dairy cows with acute post-partum metritis in the current literature |
| Q37581022 | A survey of the awareness, knowledge, policies and views of veterinary journal Editors-in-Chief on reporting guidelines for publication of research |
| Q36831373 | A systematic scoping review of adherence to reporting guidelines in health care literature |
| Q33287952 | Acute colonic diverticulitis: a systematic review of diagnostic accuracy. |
| Q38199761 | Adult scaphoid fracture |
| Q38113832 | Adult small bowel obstruction |
| Q35265459 | An assessment of the characteristics and quality of diagnostic accuracy studies for positron emission tomography conducted in Japan: a systematic review. |
| Q37033295 | Applying the STARD (Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy) checklist to the 2007 Transfusion article 'Evaluation of a new enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of Chagas antibody in US blood donors'. |
| Q28730286 | Are peer reviewers encouraged to use reporting guidelines? A survey of 116 health research journals |
| Q51877964 | Assessing the quality of diagnostic studies using psychometric instruments: applying QUADAS. |
| Q57494566 | Assessment of Adherence of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Published in Radiology Journals to STARD Statement Indexed in Web of Science, PubMed & Scopus in 2015 |
| Q42608241 | Better living through transparency: improving the reproducibility of fMRI results through comprehensive methods reporting |
| Q98772306 | Better reporting quality for improved pediatric investigation: Application of health research reporting guidelines |
| Q38265405 | Biomarkers for early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer |
| Q37700366 | Challenges and standards in reporting diagnostic and prognostic biomarker studies |
| Q44421844 | Clinical trials in sports physiotherapy. Building on five decades of research to produce even better trials: a critical review and tips for improvements |
| Q36498619 | Developing a guideline for clinical trial protocol content: Delphi consensus survey |
| Q34573768 | Development of a diagnostic test set to assess agreement in breast pathology: practical application of the Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS). |
| Q42719461 | Diagnosing depression. |
| Q38671095 | Did the reporting of prognostic studies of tumour markers improve since the introduction of REMARK guideline? A comparison of reporting in published articles |
| Q43543271 | Do journals publishing in the field of urology endorse reporting guidelines? A survey of author instructions. |
| Q34280706 | Does journal endorsement of reporting guidelines influence the completeness of reporting of health research? A systematic review protocol |
| Q35226970 | Elevating quality with manditory use of standard reporting guidelines |
| Q87818306 | Elevating the quality of disability and rehabilitation research: mandatory use of the reporting guidelines |
| Q36496634 | Evaluating the impact and use of Transparent Reporting of Evaluations with Non-randomised Designs (TREND) reporting guidelines |
| Q33703787 | Feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of brief health literacy and numeracy screening instruments in an urban emergency department |
| Q47757313 | From Nonclinical Research to Clinical Trials and Patient-registries: Challenges and Opportunities in Biomedical Research |
| Q33532614 | Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines |
| Q28731819 | Guidelines for information about therapy experiments: a proposal on best practice for recording experimental data on cancer therapy |
| Q36498818 | Guidelines for randomized clinical trial protocol content: a systematic review |
| Q21563406 | Guidelines for reporting health research: the EQUATOR network's survey of guideline authors |
| Q46817683 | Hausser la qualité de la recherche sur l'incapacité et la réadaptation : l'usage obligatoire de lignes directrices sur les rapports |
| Q46289595 | How to improve the quality of research reporting? |
| Q37851542 | How useful is it clinically to analyse the K-ras mutational status for the diagnosis of exocrine pancreatic cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis |
| Q50089165 | Improving the Quality of Clinical Neuropsychological Research: Mandatory Use of Reporting Guidelines. |
| Q56880253 | Improving the reporting and usability of research studies |
| Q37552314 | Infrequent and incomplete registration of test accuracy studies: analysis of recent study reports |
| Q38967415 | Measures of Diagnostic Accuracy: Basic Definitions |
| Q33631197 | Methodological deficits in diagnostic research using '-omics' technologies: evaluation of the QUADOMICS tool and quality of recently published studies |
| Q51092644 | Motor rehabilitation research. |
| Q24239954 | Physical examination for lumbar radiculopathy due to disc herniation in patients with low-back pain |
| Q90319176 | Poor reporting of multivariable prediction model studies: towards a targeted implementation strategy of the TRIPOD statement |
| Q37739745 | Preanalytical investigations of phlebotomy: methodological aspects, pitfalls and recommendations |
| Q92213025 | Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR): a protocol for development of a reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions |
| Q21195843 | Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement |
| Q44877031 | Problems and Progress regarding Sex Bias and Omission in Neuroscience Research |
| Q37077331 | Quality Assessment of Research Articles in Nuclear Medicine Using STARD and QUADAS-2 Tools |
| Q37133804 | Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies: no change since STARD statement publication--before-and-after study |
| Q24200528 | Red flags to screen for malignancy in patients with low-back pain |
| Q52563194 | Reducing Waste and Increasing the Usability of Psychiatry Research: The Family of EQUATOR Reporting Guidelines and One of Its Newest Members: The PRISMA-DTA Statement. |
| Q38177450 | Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research |
| Q33804561 | Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals' endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review |
| Q92139951 | Reporting Quality of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies in Laboratory Medicine: Adherence to Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) 2015 |
| Q34470301 | Reporting guidelines for modelling studies |
| Q33987339 | Reporting guidelines for survey research: an analysis of published guidance and reporting practices |
| Q40149548 | Reporting of imaging diagnostic accuracy studies with focus on MRI subgroup: Adherence to STARD 2015. |
| Q58103344 | Reporting quality of European and Croatian health practice guidelines according to the RIGHT reporting checklist |
| Q35076003 | Reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of investigations on adherence to STARD. |
| Q93013744 | Reporting quality of the 2014 Ebola outbreak in Africa: A systematic analysis |
| Q30585370 | Reporting standards for studies of diagnostic test accuracy in dementia: The STARDdem Initiative |
| Q38181463 | Reporting standards in cardiac MRI, CT, and SPECT diagnostic accuracy studies: analysis of the impact of STARD criteria |
| Q42410636 | Republication of: Elevating the quality of disability and rehabilitation research: Mandatory use of the reporting guidelines |
| Q37476411 | Responsible reporting of health research studies: transparent, complete, accurate and timely |
| Q38113989 | Review article: reporting guidelines in the biomedical literature |
| Q38254059 | STARD guideline in diagnostic accuracy tests: perspective from a systematic reviewer. |
| Q64898138 | Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research. |
| Q33595810 | Selection and presentation of imaging figures in the medical literature |
| Q89764873 | Sex bias and omission in neuroscience research is influenced by research model and journal, but not reported NIH funding |
| Q34531049 | Spontaneous Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Describing the Diagnostic Accuracy of History, Physical Examination, Imaging, and Lumbar Puncture With an Exploration of Test Thresholds |
| Q24289354 | Strengthening the reporting of genetic risk prediction studies (GRIPS): explanation and elaboration. |
| Q24289476 | Strengthening the reporting of genetic risk prediction studies (GRIPS): explanation and elaboration |
| Q56632047 | Strengthening the reporting of genetic risk prediction studies (GRIPS): explanation and elaboration |
| Q30244704 | Systematic review of patient history and physical examination to diagnose chronic low back pain originating from the facet joints. |
| Q37346962 | Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy |
| Q99571741 | TRIPOD statement: a preliminary pre-post analysis of reporting and methods of prediction models |
| Q35094810 | The National Institutes of Health and guidance for reporting preclinical research |
| Q58568199 | The Reporting Items for Patent Landscapes statement |
| Q38354369 | The effect of the SQUIRE (Standards of QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence) guidelines on reporting standards in the quality improvement literature: a before-and-after study |
| Q29615391 | The minimum information about a proteomics experiment (MIAPE) |
| Q33853278 | The quality of reporting of primary test accuracy studies in obstetrics and gynaecology: application of the STARD criteria |
| Q39364567 | The quality of reports of medical and public health research from Palestinian institutions: a systematic review |
| Q24288938 | Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network |
| Q38056922 | Trends in telemedicine assessment indicate neglect of key criteria for predicting success |
| Q64092177 | Uniformity in measuring adherence to reporting guidelines: the example of TRIPOD for assessing completeness of reporting of prediction model studies |
| Q34055057 | Uses and misuses of the STROBE statement: bibliographic study |
| Q37076046 | Variation of a test's sensitivity and specificity with disease prevalence |
| Q38151610 | Verification bias in diagnostic accuracy studies for fine- and core needle biopsy of salivary gland lesions in otolaryngology journals: a systematic review and analysis |
| Q50134868 | [Transparency and replicability of nursing intervention studies in long-term care: A selective literature review]. |
Search more.