How relationship status and sociosexual orientation influence the link between facial attractiveness and visual attention

scientific article published in PLoS ONE

How relationship status and sociosexual orientation influence the link between facial attractiveness and visual attention is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0207477
P932PMC publication ID6241135
P698PubMed publication ID30427937

P50authorAleksandra MitrovicQ59703031
P2093author name stringHelmut Leder
Pablo P L Tinio
Juergen Goller
P2860cites workThe fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perceptionQ28238243
Subjective and objective measures of attractiveness and their relation to sexual behavior and sexual attitudes in university students.Q50917541
Individual differences in sociosexuality: evidence for convergent and discriminant validity.Q51159071
The relationship between sociosexuality and aspects of body image in men and women: a structural equation modeling approach.Q51211456
Face perception is modulated by sexual preference.Q51291541
The evolution of human sexualityQ56144644
Once more: Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Relative contributions of private and shared taste to judgments of facial attractivenessQ57075627
Visual following and pattern discrimination of face-like stimuli by newborn infantsQ67278023
Teaching may be hazardous to your marriageQ73828297
Faces retain attentionQ83155934
Beautiful faces have variable reward value: fMRI and behavioral evidenceQ34101858
The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: testing the tradeoffsQ34132089
Beauty hinders attention switch in change detection: the role of facial attractiveness and distinctivenessQ34186051
Gender differences in sexuality: a meta-analysis.Q34352261
Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: a 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human matingQ34456334
Human facial expressions as adaptations: Evolutionary questions in facial expression researchQ34490197
Beyond global sociosexual orientations: a more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationshipsQ34866627
Using eye tracking to test for individual differences in attention to attractive faces.Q35037189
Beauty in the brain of the beholder.Q35135406
Darwinian aesthetics: sexual selection and the biology of beauty.Q35559350
Can beauty be ignored? Effects of facial attractiveness on covert attentionQ35931666
Adaptive Allocation of Attention: Effects of Sex and Sociosexuality on Visual Attention to Attractive Opposite-Sex FacesQ36082606
Consequences of Beauty: Effects of Rater Sex and Sexual Orientation on the Visual Exploration and Evaluation of Attractiveness in Real World ScenesQ36707504
Private and Shared Taste in Art and Face AppreciationQ36792471
How Beauty Determines Gaze! Facial Attractiveness and Gaze Duration in Images of Real World Scenes.Q37271966
Are attractive people rewarding? Sex differences in the neural substrates of facial attractivenessQ37358431
A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993-2007.Q37671793
Neural and behavioral responses to attractiveness in adult and infant faces.Q38246988
Can't take my eyes off you: Attentional adhesion to mates and rivalsQ38395383
Familiarity and attention: does what we know affect what we notice?Q38462798
Faces call for attention: evidence from patients with visual extinctionQ41721544
Gaze bias both reflects and influences preferenceQ46076162
The preferred traits of mates in a cross-national study of heterosexual and homosexual men and women: an examination of biological and cultural influencesQ46916254
Gender and visibility of sexual cues influence eye movements while viewing faces and bodies.Q47219151
Gazing behavior during mixed-sex interactions: sex and attractiveness effectsQ47273560
Relational Motives Reduce Attentional Adhesion to Attractive Alternatives in Heterosexual University Students in ChinaQ47428617
Visual Attention Patterns Differ in Gynephilic and Androphilic Men and Women Depending on Age and Gender of Targets.Q47656121
Human facial beauty : Averageness, symmetry, and parasite resistance.Q47724610
Attractiveness difference magnitude affected by context, range, and categorizationQ48081284
Mimicking attractive opposite-sex others: the role of romantic relationship statusQ48345775
Sexually selective cognition: beauty captures the mind of the beholderQ48567394
Romantic relationship status biases memory of faces of attractive opposite-sex others: evidence from a reverse-correlation paradigmQ48595287
When attractiveness demands longer looks: the effects of situation and genderQ48842441
Sex differences in adults' relative visual interest in female and male faces, toys, and play styles.Q48868761
P275copyright licenseCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 InternationalQ20007257
P6216copyright statuscopyrightedQ50423863
P433issue11
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P921main subjectattentionQ6501338
P304page(s)e0207477
P577publication date2018-11-14
P1433published inPLOS OneQ564954
P1476titleHow relationship status and sociosexual orientation influence the link between facial attractiveness and visual attention
P478volume13

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q92403918Automatic Inattention to Attractive Alternative Partners Helps Male Heterosexual Chinese College Students Maintain Romantic Relationships
Q90697667Mechanisms for the Cognitive Processing of Attractiveness in Adult and Infant Faces: From the Evolutionary Perspective
Q92253326Visual cues to fertility are in the eye (movements) of the beholder