Bias due to MEasurement Reactions In Trials to improve health (MERIT): protocol for research to develop MRC guidance

article

Bias due to MEasurement Reactions In Trials to improve health (MERIT): protocol for research to develop MRC guidance is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P6179Dimensions Publication ID1110209870
P356DOI10.1186/S13063-018-3017-5
P932PMC publication ID6258480
P698PubMed publication ID30477551

P50authorJim McCambridgeQ59557773
Stephen SuttonQ59767535
Lisa M MilesQ79274697
Martin C. GullifordQ39515110
P2093author name stringDiana Elbourne
David P French
Andrew Farmer
Louise Locock
P2860cites workCan simply answering research questions change behaviour? Systematic review and meta analyses of brief alcohol intervention trialsQ26991802
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statementQ27860606
A meta-analysis of computer-tailored interventions for health behavior changeQ30496594
Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic reviewQ33306672
Using the internet to promote health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacyQ33720324
Can research assessments themselves cause bias in behaviour change trials? A systematic review of evidence from solomon 4-group studiesQ34062211
Does electronic monitoring influence adherence to medication? Randomized controlled trial of measurement reactivity.Q34468607
Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings.Q34538520
Computer-based interventions to improve self-management in adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysisQ35172994
Anticipated regret to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening (ARTICS): A randomised controlled trialQ36076294
Enhanced invitation methods and uptake of health checks in primary care: randomised controlled trial and cohort study using electronic health recordsQ36193498
The clinical significance of adaptation to changing health: a meta-analysis of response shiftQ36619372
SURVEY RESEARCHQ56096243
Does Thinking about Personal Health Risk Increase Anxiety?Q60683022
An extension of control group designQ80311034
Effective techniques in healthy eating and physical activity interventions: a meta-regression.Q37633521
Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: new concepts are needed to study research participation effectsQ37671448
Reactivity of measurement in health psychology: how much of a problem is it? What can be done about it?Q37703416
Defining consensus: a systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies.Q38192139
Research participation effects: a skeleton in the methodological cupboardQ38207181
The question-behavior effect: genuine effect or spurious phenomenon? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials with meta-analyses.Q38240934
The Impact of Asking Intention or Self-Prediction Questions on Subsequent Behavior: A Meta-AnalysisQ38545003
In randomization we trust? There are overlooked problems in experimenting with people in behavioral intervention trialsQ38550754
DEFINING RAPID REVIEWS: A MODIFIED DELPHI CONSENSUS APPROACH.Q38977207
Commentary: The Impact of Asking Intention or Self-Prediction Questions on Subsequent Behavior: A Meta-Analysis.Q42005188
Initial elevation bias in subjective reports.Q47562873
AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or bothQ47684085
Personal experiences of taking part in clinical trials - a qualitative studyQ48125012
What sense do people make of a theory of planned behaviour questionnaire?: a think-aloud study.Q48255269
P275copyright licenseCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 InternationalQ20007257
P6216copyright statuscopyrightedQ50423863
P433issue1
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P921main subjectbiasQ742736
P304page(s)653
P577publication date2018-11-26
P1433published inTrialsQ7840023
P1476titleBias due to MEasurement Reactions In Trials to improve health (MERIT): protocol for research to develop MRC guidance
P478volume19

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q89504322"Asking Too Much?": Randomized N-of-1 Trial Exploring Patient Preferences and Measurement Reactivity to Frequent Use of Remote Multidimensional Pain Assessments in Children and Young People With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis
Q64097051Cardiovascular health technology assessment: recommendations to improve the quality of evidence

Search more.