Comparative effectiveness of the different components of care provided in heart failure clinics-protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis

scientific article published on 02 February 2019

Comparative effectiveness of the different components of care provided in heart failure clinics-protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P6179Dimensions Publication ID1111894093
P356DOI10.1186/S13643-019-0953-4
P932PMC publication ID6359805
P698PubMed publication ID30711016

P50authorJoanna BieleckiQ58416921
Lusine AbrahamyanQ87257110
Murray KrahnQ41896189
Morgan SlaterQ57071082
P2093author name stringWilliam Wong
Susanna Mak
George Tomlinson
Douglas Lee
Shelley Zieroth
Heather Ross
Jane MacIver
Valeria E Rac
Ana Carolina Alba
P2860cites workPreferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statementQ21195843
Clinical service organisation for heart failureQ24200713
Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidanceQ24647443
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical testQ24685585
2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelinesQ26864648
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trialsQ27860509
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statementQ27860537
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendationsQ27860753
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanationQ29615706
Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisonsQ29619499
The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsQ29619501
Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve healthQ29619503
GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence--study limitations (risk of bias)Q29619791
The global health and economic burden of hospitalizations for heart failure: lessons learned from hospitalized heart failure registries.Q30358659
Specialized multi-disciplinary heart failure clinics in Ontario, Canada: an environmental scanQ30528623
The 2010 Canadian Cardiovascular Society guidelines for the diagnosis and management of heart failure update: Heart failure in ethnic minority populations, heart failure and pregnancy, disease management, and quality improvement/assurance programsQ33916607
Simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments: combining direct and indirect evidence.Q34081552
Systematic review of multidisciplinary interventions in heart failure.Q35584426
Heart Failure Management Programmes in EuropeQ57315301
2016 ACC/AHA/HFSA Focused Update on New Pharmacological Therapy for Heart Failure: An Update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart FailureQ57629858
Cost-Effectiveness of Specialized Multidisciplinary Heart Failure Clinics in Ontario, CanadaQ57688523
Effectiveness of comprehensive disease management programmes in improving clinical outcomes in heart failure patients. A meta-analysisQ81296809
US government kicks off program for comparative effectiveness researchQ82564314
Evidence synthesis for decision making 4: inconsistency in networks of evidence based on randomized controlled trialsQ43102818
Assessing the burden of hospitalized and community-care heart failure in CanadaQ43637573
Patterns of hospital performance in acute myocardial infarction and heart failure 30-day mortality and readmissionQ44648492
The growing burden of perioperative heart failure.Q44870569
Developing and evaluating complex interventions: reflections on the 2008 MRC guidance.Q46024894
Impact of home versus clinic-based management of chronic heart failure: the WHICH? (Which Heart Failure Intervention Is Most Cost-Effective & Consumer Friendly in Reducing Hospital Care) multicenter, randomized trialQ46656836
Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network meta-analysis for health-care decision making: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 1.Q46894544
Factors affecting uptake of childhood immunisation: a Bayesian synthesis of qualitative and quantitative evidence.Q52028008
Borrowing strength from external trials in a meta-analysis.Q52287071
How to use an article reporting a multiple treatment comparison meta-analysis.Q53106594
GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecisionQ57269328
Referral and use of heart failure clinics: what factors are related to use?Q35828261
Multidisciplinary strategies for the management of heart failure patients at high risk for admission: a systematic review of randomized trials.Q35863540
Economic burden of heart failure: a summary of recent literatureQ35982912
Heart failure disease management: implementation and outcomesQ36232854
Bayesian methods for evidence synthesis in cost-effectiveness analysisQ36381197
Canadian Cardiovascular Society consensus conference recommendations on heart failure 2006: diagnosis and managementQ36383373
A systematic meta-analysis of the efficacy and heterogeneity of disease management programs in congestive heart failureQ36585531
Treating the right patient at the right time: access to heart failure careQ36921035
Evaluation of networks of randomized trialsQ36966424
Evidence synthesis for decision making 3: heterogeneity--subgroups, meta-regression, bias, and bias-adjustmentQ36991744
The current and future financial burden of hospital admissions for heart failure in Canada: a cost analysisQ37306238
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventionsQ37335426
Cochrane methods--twenty years experience in developing systematic review methodsQ37360581
Meta-analysis: pitfalls and hintsQ37403724
Mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis of complex interventions: psychological interventions in coronary heart diseaseQ37405745
Heart failure burden and therapyQ37622587
Conducting indirect-treatment-comparison and network-meta-analysis studies: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 2.Q37888895
GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidenceQ37908614
GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence--indirectnessQ37908616
GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence--publication biasQ37908618
GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence--inconsistencyQ37908778
Stent thrombosis with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: evidence from a comprehensive network meta-analysis.Q37996688
Specialist clinics for reducing emergency admissions in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trialsQ38077175
Demystifying trial networks and network meta-analysisQ38106916
The annual global economic burden of heart failureQ38176481
Heart failure clinics are still useful (more than ever?).Q38182261
Mortality risk among sulfonylureas: a systematic review and network meta-analysisQ38281461
Use of GRADE for assessment of evidence about prognosis: rating confidence in estimates of event rates in broad categories of patientsQ38379946
Mortality in patients treated with extended duration dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stent implantation: a pairwise and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomised trials.Q38380479
Effect of moderate or intensive disease management program on outcome in patients with heart failure: Coordinating Study Evaluating Outcomes of Advising and Counseling in Heart Failure (COACH).Q38392232
Mode of action and effects of standardized collaborative disease management on mortality and morbidity in patients with systolic heart failure: the Interdisciplinary Network for Heart Failure (INH) studyQ38483735
The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanationsQ38510678
The epidemiology of heart failure: the Framingham StudyQ38512101
The attractiveness of network meta-analysis: a comprehensive systematic and narrative reviewQ38544308
Multidisciplinary management of chronic heart failure: principles and future trends.Q38594277
Detecting outlying trials in network meta-analysis.Q41103546
P275copyright licenseCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 InternationalQ20007257
P6216copyright statuscopyrightedQ50423863
P433issue1
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P921main subjectsystematic reviewQ1504425
P304page(s)40
P577publication date2019-02-02
P1433published inSystematic ReviewsQ18216009
P1476titleComparative effectiveness of the different components of care provided in heart failure clinics-protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
P478volume8

Reverse relations

Q90225035The Role of Ambulatory Heart Failure Clinics to Avoid Heart Failure Admissionscites workP2860

Search more.