Stabilization of a Cart Inverted Pendulum: Improving the Intermittent Feedback Strategy to Match the Limits of Human Performance

scientific article published on 05 April 2019

Stabilization of a Cart Inverted Pendulum: Improving the Intermittent Feedback Strategy to Match the Limits of Human Performance is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P8978DBLP publication IDjournals/ficn/MorassoNSZ19
P356DOI10.3389/FNCOM.2019.00016
P932PMC publication ID6461063
P698PubMed publication ID31024281

P50authorYasuyuki SuzukiQ48277553
Taishin NomuraQ48277568
P2093author name stringJacopo Zenzeri
Pietro Morasso
P2860cites workReinforcement learning for stabilizing an inverted pendulum naturally leads to intermittent feedback control as in human quiet standing.Q50452400
Intermittent control: a computational theory of human control.Q50687767
Intermittent control of unstable multivariate systems with uncertain system parameters.Q50858203
Modeling human postural sway using an intermittent control and hemodynamic perturbations.Q51252682
Possible functional roles of phase resetting during walking.Q52014797
Stability of bipedal stance: the contribution of cocontraction and spindle feedback.Q52018458
Human stick balancing: tuning Lèvy flights to improve balance control.Q52087302
Mechanics and energetics of stilt walkingQ70874861
Stiffness control of balance in quiet standingQ77323531
Ankle muscle stiffness alone cannot stabilize balance during quiet standingQ78328167
On-off intermittency in a human balancing taskQ78334367
The sway-density curve and the underlying postural stabilization processQ80475842
Bounded stability of the quiet standing posture: an intermittent control modelQ80876425
Body sway during quiet standing: is it the residual chattering of an intermittent stabilization process?Q81163774
Direct measurement of human ankle stiffness during quiet standing: the intrinsic mechanical stiffness is insufficient for stabilityQ24641852
Control at stability's edge minimizes energetic costs: expert stick balancing.Q30782951
Motor learning characterized by changing Lévy distributionsQ33471461
Can muscle stiffness alone stabilize upright standing?Q33731138
Direct measurement of ankle stiffness during quiet standing: implications for control modelling and clinical application.Q34417696
Learning an intermittent control strategy for postural balancing using an EMG-based human-computer interfaceQ34743880
Acceleration feedback improves balancing against reflex delay.Q36591063
A model of postural control in quiet standing: robust compensation of delay-induced instability using intermittent activation of feedback controlQ37248398
Intermittent Feedback-Control Strategy for Stabilizing Inverted Pendulum on Manually Controlled Cart as Analogy to Human Stick Balancing.Q40306248
Feedforward ankle strategy of balance during quiet stance in adultsQ42689613
Forward models in visuomotor controlQ46618837
Human control of an inverted pendulum: is continuous control necessary? Is intermittent control effective? Is intermittent control physiological?Q48170219
Open-loop and closed-loop control of posture: a random-walk analysis of center-of-pressure trajectoriesQ48381609
Intermittent control with ankle, hip, and mixed strategies during quiet standing: a theoretical proposal based on a double inverted pendulum modelQ48461022
Sensory uncertainty and stick balancing at the fingertip.Q48520013
P275copyright licenseCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 InternationalQ20007257
P6216copyright statuscopyrightedQ50423863
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P304page(s)16
P577publication date2019-04-05
P1433published inFrontiers in Computational NeuroscienceQ15817583
P1476titleStabilization of a Cart Inverted Pendulum: Improving the Intermittent Feedback Strategy to Match the Limits of Human Performance
P478volume13