scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P50 | author | Nicholas Mikolajewicz | Q88848712 |
P2093 | author name string | Svetlana V Komarova | |
P2860 | cites work | Sensitivity of between-study heterogeneity in meta-analysis: proposed metrics and empirical evaluation | Q51888144 |
Natural distribution | Q51906496 | ||
A graphical method for exploring heterogeneity in meta-analyses: application to a meta-analysis of 65 trials | Q52032770 | ||
Chronic hypoxia changes the ratio of endothelin to ATP release from rat aortic endothelial cells exposed to high flow | Q52232629 | ||
Interpreting epidemiological evidence: how meta-analysis and causal inference methods are related | Q52923142 | ||
Meta-analysis of mechanically-stimulated ATP release from mammalian cells | Q58545123 | ||
The power of statistical tests in meta-analysis | Q74550364 | ||
How can we improve the pre-clinical development of drugs for stroke? | Q36926526 | ||
Methods to estimate the between-study variance and its uncertainty in meta-analysis | Q37106409 | ||
The chi-square test of independence | Q37508430 | ||
Meta-analysis and causal inference: a case study of benzene and non-Hodgkin lymphoma | Q37728658 | ||
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis: Understanding the Best Evidence in Primary Healthcare | Q38183404 | ||
A Bayesian nonparametric meta-analysis model | Q38512934 | ||
Graphical displays for meta-analysis: An overview with suggestions for practice | Q38521592 | ||
Identifying and removing duplicate records from systematic review searches | Q38618958 | ||
De-duplication of database search results for systematic reviews in EndNote. | Q38882979 | ||
Power analysis for random-effects meta-analysis. | Q41501428 | ||
Commentary: Heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be expected and appropriately quantified | Q45671624 | ||
Standardized or simple effect size: what should be reported? | Q47206758 | ||
Confidence intervals for the overall effect size in random-effects meta-analysis. | Q47242769 | ||
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement | Q21562278 | ||
BioNumbers--the database of key numbers in molecular and cell biology | Q24643881 | ||
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test | Q24685585 | ||
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses | Q27860655 | ||
Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis | Q27860672 | ||
Meta-analysis in clinical trials | Q27860779 | ||
What are the best methodologies for rapid reviews of the research evidence for evidence-informed decision making in health policy and practice: a rapid review | Q28074678 | ||
How should meta-regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? | Q28193388 | ||
Performance of statistical methods for meta-analysis when true study effects are non-normally distributed: A simulation study | Q28300355 | ||
1,026 experimental treatments in acute stroke | Q29615509 | ||
Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index? | Q29619545 | ||
Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials | Q29620299 | ||
An evaluation of homogeneity tests in meta-analyses in pain using simulations of individual patient data | Q30592707 | ||
Meta-analysis of data from animal studies: a practical guide | Q30671623 | ||
Meta-analysis with missing study-level sample variance data. | Q31047287 | ||
Systematic reviews need systematic searchers | Q31145396 | ||
Meta-analysis of skewed data: combining results reported on log-transformed or raw scales | Q33370319 | ||
Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews. | Q34036655 | ||
Assessment of publication bias, selection bias, and unavailable data in meta-analyses using individual participant data: a database survey | Q34116497 | ||
Replicates and repeats--what is the difference and is it significant? A brief discussion of statistics and experimental design | Q34261739 | ||
Reference management software for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: an exploration of usage and usability | Q35044395 | ||
The heterogeneity statistic I(2) can be biased in small meta-analyses | Q35604237 | ||
USING THE AMSTAR CHECKLIST FOR RAPID REVIEWS: IS IT FEASIBLE? | Q36165515 | ||
Literature search strategies for conducting knowledge‐building and theory‐generating qualitative systematic reviews | Q36179621 | ||
Standard deviations and standard errors | Q36285640 | ||
Conducting a winning literature search | Q36718876 | ||
P275 | copyright license | Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International | Q20007257 |
P6216 | copyright status | copyrighted | Q50423863 |
P921 | main subject | meta-analysis | Q815382 |
P304 | page(s) | 203 | |
P577 | publication date | 2019-03-27 | |
P1433 | published in | Frontiers in Physiology | Q2434141 |
P1476 | title | Meta-Analytic Methodology for Basic Research: A Practical Guide | |
P478 | volume | 10 |
Search more.