Meta-Analytic Methodology for Basic Research: A Practical Guide

scientific article published on 27 March 2019

Meta-Analytic Methodology for Basic Research: A Practical Guide is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.3389/FPHYS.2019.00203
P932PMC publication ID6445886
P698PubMed publication ID30971933

P50authorNicholas MikolajewiczQ88848712
P2093author name stringSvetlana V Komarova
P2860cites workSensitivity of between-study heterogeneity in meta-analysis: proposed metrics and empirical evaluationQ51888144
Natural distributionQ51906496
A graphical method for exploring heterogeneity in meta-analyses: application to a meta-analysis of 65 trialsQ52032770
Chronic hypoxia changes the ratio of endothelin to ATP release from rat aortic endothelial cells exposed to high flowQ52232629
Interpreting epidemiological evidence: how meta-analysis and causal inference methods are relatedQ52923142
Meta-analysis of mechanically-stimulated ATP release from mammalian cellsQ58545123
The power of statistical tests in meta-analysisQ74550364
How can we improve the pre-clinical development of drugs for stroke?Q36926526
Methods to estimate the between-study variance and its uncertainty in meta-analysisQ37106409
The chi-square test of independenceQ37508430
Meta-analysis and causal inference: a case study of benzene and non-Hodgkin lymphomaQ37728658
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis: Understanding the Best Evidence in Primary HealthcareQ38183404
A Bayesian nonparametric meta-analysis modelQ38512934
Graphical displays for meta-analysis: An overview with suggestions for practiceQ38521592
Identifying and removing duplicate records from systematic review searchesQ38618958
De-duplication of database search results for systematic reviews in EndNote.Q38882979
Power analysis for random-effects meta-analysis.Q41501428
Commentary: Heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be expected and appropriately quantifiedQ45671624
Standardized or simple effect size: what should be reported?Q47206758
Confidence intervals for the overall effect size in random-effects meta-analysis.Q47242769
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statementQ21562278
BioNumbers--the database of key numbers in molecular and cell biologyQ24643881
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical testQ24685585
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesQ27860655
Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysisQ27860672
Meta-analysis in clinical trialsQ27860779
What are the best methodologies for rapid reviews of the research evidence for evidence-informed decision making in health policy and practice: a rapid reviewQ28074678
How should meta-regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?Q28193388
Performance of statistical methods for meta-analysis when true study effects are non-normally distributed: A simulation studyQ28300355
1,026 experimental treatments in acute strokeQ29615509
Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index?Q29619545
Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trialsQ29620299
An evaluation of homogeneity tests in meta-analyses in pain using simulations of individual patient dataQ30592707
Meta-analysis of data from animal studies: a practical guideQ30671623
Meta-analysis with missing study-level sample variance data.Q31047287
Systematic reviews need systematic searchersQ31145396
Meta-analysis of skewed data: combining results reported on log-transformed or raw scalesQ33370319
Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews.Q34036655
Assessment of publication bias, selection bias, and unavailable data in meta-analyses using individual participant data: a database surveyQ34116497
Replicates and repeats--what is the difference and is it significant? A brief discussion of statistics and experimental designQ34261739
Reference management software for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: an exploration of usage and usabilityQ35044395
The heterogeneity statistic I(2) can be biased in small meta-analysesQ35604237
USING THE AMSTAR CHECKLIST FOR RAPID REVIEWS: IS IT FEASIBLE?Q36165515
Literature search strategies for conducting knowledge‐building and theory‐generating qualitative systematic reviewsQ36179621
Standard deviations and standard errorsQ36285640
Conducting a winning literature searchQ36718876
P275copyright licenseCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 InternationalQ20007257
P6216copyright statuscopyrightedQ50423863
P921main subjectmeta-analysisQ815382
P304page(s)203
P577publication date2019-03-27
P1433published inFrontiers in PhysiologyQ2434141
P1476titleMeta-Analytic Methodology for Basic Research: A Practical Guide
P478volume10

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q94927715A systematic review and meta-analysis of bone loss in space travelers
Q92092671Extracellular matrix composition of connective tissues: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Search more.