The impact of patient feedback on the medical performance of qualified doctors: a systematic review.

scientific article

The impact of patient feedback on the medical performance of qualified doctors: a systematic review. is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814
review articleQ7318358

External links are
P6179Dimensions Publication ID1105932541
P356DOI10.1186/S12909-018-1277-0
P932PMC publication ID6069829
P698PubMed publication ID30064413

P50authorJulian ArcherQ51768909
Marie BryceQ58390149
P2093author name stringMartin Marshall
Rebecca Baines
Mirza Lalani
Sam Regan de Bere
Jamie Read
Sebastian Stevens
P2860cites workPreferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statementQ27860606
Realist review--a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventionsQ29615815
Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviewsQ29618082
Internet-based medical education: a realist review of what works, for whom and in what circumstancesQ30493272
Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groupsQ33251994
An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategiesQ33410921
Factors influencing the effectiveness of multisource feedback in improving the professional practice of medical doctors: a systematic reviewQ33573025
Impact of workplace based assessment on doctors' education and performance: a systematic reviewQ33703459
Physician groups' use of data from patient experience surveys.Q33772633
Factors predicting doctors' reporting of performance change in response to multisource feedback.Q34332476
Experiencing patient-experience surveys: a qualitative study of the accounts of GPsQ34711906
Sexual minorities in England have poorer health and worse health care experiences: a national surveyQ34826262
Family physician practice visits arising from the Alberta Physician Achievement ReviewQ34980372
Do 360-degree feedback survey results relate to patient satisfaction measures?Q35268284
Multisource feedback questionnaires in appraisal and for revalidation: a qualitative study in UK general practiceQ35916790
Pay-for-performance in the United Kingdom: impact of the quality and outcomes framework: a systematic review.Q36222903
Evaluation of the physician quality improvement initiative: the expected and unexpected opportunitiesQ36393314
Creating the Exceptional Patient Experience in One Academic Health SystemQ36947829
Health professionals, patients and chronic illness policy: a qualitative studyQ37332649
The effect of performance-based financial incentives on improving patient care experiences: a statewide evaluationQ37456544
State of the science in health professional education: effective feedbackQ37676321
Three methods of multi-source feedback compared: a plea for narrative comments and coworkers' perspectives.Q37693904
How do physicians assess their family physician colleagues' performance?: creating a rubric to inform assessment and feedbackQ37889202
The effect of patient feedback on physicians' consultation skills: a systematic reviewQ37939483
Kirkpatrick's levels and education 'evidence'.Q37965786
Clinical audit--process and outcome for improved clinical practiceQ38077986
Practicing physicians' needs for assessment and feedback as part of professional developmentQ38172037
Patient satisfaction surveys and quality of care: an information paperQ38198339
Impact of isolated clinical performance feedback on clinical productivity of an academic surgical facultyQ38468568
Improving Patient Satisfaction in a Midsize Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Outpatient ClinicQ38541256
Can 360-Degree Reviews Help Surgeons? Evaluation of Multisource Feedback for Surgeons in a Multi-Institutional Quality Improvement ProjectQ38974485
Cracking the code: residents' interpretations of written assessment commentsQ39017514
Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews.Q39029662
Motivators and barriers to using patient experience reports for performance improvement.Q44661957
Changes in performance: a 5-year longitudinal study of participants in a multi-source feedback programmeQ46086344
Translation of the Medical Leadership Competency Framework into a multisource feedback form for doctors in training using a verbal protocol techniqueQ46808460
Adolescent narrative comments in assessing medical studentsQ47857423
Wisdom of patients: predicting the quality of care using aggregated patient feedbackQ47876722
Twelve tips to promote a feedback culture with a growth mind-set: Swinging the feedback pendulum from recipes to relationships.Q48091275
Doctors' perceptions of why 360-degree feedback does (not) work: a qualitative study.Q48260462
Towards an understanding of how appraisal of doctors produces its effects: a realist review.Q48323240
Criminalising doctorsQ50119089
Reading between the lines: faculty interpretations of narrative evaluation comments.Q50600249
Providing feedback: exploring a model (emotion, content, outcomes) for facilitating multisource feedback.Q50614615
Do assessor comments on a multi-source feedback instrument provide learner-centred feedback?Q50716268
Understanding the influence of emotions and reflection upon multi-source feedback acceptance and use.Q50919666
Does questionnaire-based patient feedback reflect the important qualities of clinical consultations? Context, benefits and risks.Q51897994
Reflection: a link between receiving and using assessment feedback.Q51955654
Portfolio learning for foundation doctors: early feedback on its use in the clinical workplace.Q51966148
Challenges in multisource feedback: intended and unintended outcomes.Q51985247
An interactive, all-payer, multidomain primary care performance dashboard.Q53458511
What Multisource Feedback Factors Influence Physician Self-Assessments? A Five-Year Longitudinal StudyQ61821955
Effect of multisource feedback on resident communication skills and professionalism: a randomized controlled trialQ79470996
Listening to older adults: elderly patients' experience of care in residency and practicing physician outpatient clinicsQ83958841
Creating and sustaining a collaborative model of careQ84199599
P275copyright licenseCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 InternationalQ20007257
P433issue1
P921main subjectlearningQ133500
systematic reviewQ1504425
biomedical investigative techniqueQ66648976
patient reported outcome measuresQ70453213
P304page(s)173
P577publication date2018-07-31
P1433published inBMC Medical EducationQ15760459
P1476titleThe impact of patient feedback on the medical performance of qualified doctors: a systematic review.
P478volume18

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q93135099An electronic patient-reported outcomes measurement system in paediatric orthopaedics
Q92102248Early Performance Trends After the Public Posting of Ambulatory Patient Satisfaction Reviews
Q91732720Feedback Redefined: Principles and Practice
Q92139226Reflection in practice: How can patient experience feedback trigger staff reflection in hospital acute care settings?

Search more.