An empirical study of the possible relation of treatment differences to quality scores in controlled randomized clinical trials

scientific article published on 01 October 1990

An empirical study of the possible relation of treatment differences to quality scores in controlled randomized clinical trials is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1016/0197-2456(90)90175-2
P698PubMed publication ID1963128

P50authorFrederick MostellerQ735455
P2093author name stringE Burdick
T C Chalmers
D C Hoaglin
J D Emerson
P433issue5
P304page(s)339-352
P577publication date1990-10-01
P1433published inContemporary Clinical TrialsQ5164971
P1476titleAn empirical study of the possible relation of treatment differences to quality scores in controlled randomized clinical trials
P478volume11

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q84964334A Critical Appraisal of Standard Guidelines for Grading Levels of Evidence
Q59350118A Meta-analysis of the Association Between Needle Exchange Programs and HIV Seroconversion Among Injection Drug Users
Q55122888A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Strength and Consistency of the Associations between Dupuytren Disease and Diabetes Mellitus, Liver Disease, and Epilepsy.
Q33754508A meta-analysis of the effects of ipratropium bromide in adults with acute asthma
Q35607661A systematic review of the effect of expectancy on treatment responses to acupuncture
Q91970838Add-On Effects of Chinese Herbal Medicine for Post-Stroke Spasticity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Q33939142Adequacy and reporting of allocation concealment: review of recent trials published in four general medical journals
Q71980279An evaluation of technologies for identifying acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department: a report from a National Heart Attack Alert Program Working Group
Q33730692Assessing "best evidence": issues in grading the quality of studies for systematic reviews
Q41737387Balneotherapy and Quality Assessment: Interobserver Reliability of the Maastricht Criteria List and the Need for Blinded Quality Assessment
Q73129497Biofeedback therapy in stroke rehabilitation: a review
Q26827628CD133 Expression and the Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Q46423878Can statin therapy reduce the risk of melanoma? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Q36887882Checklists for review articles
Q21285127Combined Effects of Aerobic Exercise and Diet on Lipids and Lipoproteins in Overweight and Obese Adults: A Meta-Analysis
Q35571785Considerations for the design and analysis of experimental studies in physical activity and exercise promotion: advantages of the randomised controlled trial.
Q44805168Docetaxel in combination with cisplatin for first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: meta-analysis of randomized and controlled clinical trials
Q37786308Effects of community‐deliverable exercise on pain and physical function in adults with arthritis and other rheumatic diseases: A meta‐analysis
Q33933632Efficacy of aerobic exercise and a prudent diet for improving selected lipids and lipoproteins in adults: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Q24799623Evaluating the role of quality assessment of primary studies in systematic reviews of cancer practice guidelines
Q43967417Evaluation of the effectiveness of a pre-brushing rinse in plaque removal: a meta-analysis
Q35677219Evidence synthesis for medical decision making and the appropriate use of quality scores
Q47232478Exercise and adiposity in overweight and obese children and adolescents: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised trials.
Q33560462Exercise and global well-being in community-dwelling adults with fibromyalgia: a systematic review with meta-analysis
Q36242013Focused Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in Calcifying Tendinitis of the Shoulder: A Meta-Analysis
Q71590902Functional electrostimulation in poststroke rehabilitation: a meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials
Q57338290GRADE-Leitlinien: 4. Bewertung der Qualität der Evidenz – Studienlimitationen (Risiko für Bias)
Q35565662Ginkgo biloba for cerebral insufficiency
Q34423049Heparin therapy reduces 28-day mortality in adult severe sepsis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Q40935484How to systematically review the medical literature
Q34034578Immunomodulation with echinacea - a systematic review of controlled clinical trials
Q29545140Impact of Study Quality on Outcome in Placebo-Controlled Trials of Homeopathy
Q24234453Influenza vaccines for prevention of influenza-like illness and influenza in immunosuppressed cancer patients
Q34250291Infusion of calcium and magnesium for oxaliplatin-induced sensory neurotoxicity in colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Q58803518Interferon treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B: A meta-analysis of the published literature
Q79385815Levels of evidence and journal impact factor in oral and maxillofacial surgery
Q41751183Management of confounding in controlled orthopaedic trials: a cross-sectional study
Q64133010Meta-Analysis for the Practicing Obstetrician-Gynecologist
Q41378434Metaanalysis for the obstetrician-gynecologist
Q77922445Metaanalytic revision of endpoints
Q74796707Meta‐analysis of clinical trials in periodontal research
Q36832300Methodological quality of randomised controlled trials comparing short-term results of laparoscopic and conventional colorectal resection
Q43051829PREOP: development of an evidence-based expert system to assist with preoperative assessments
Q38211506Pain prevalence and its determinants after spinal cord injury: a systematic review
Q33730688Pooling research results: benefits and limitations of meta-analysis
Q31161134Poor reliability between Cochrane reviewers and blinded external reviewers when applying the Cochrane risk of bias tool in physical therapy trials
Q38780302Preoperative preemptive drug administration for acute postoperative pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Q74038930Problems in the “Evidence” of “Evidence-Based Medicine”
Q36888944Prognosis of conservatively managed anterior cruciate ligament injury: a systematic review.
Q24235283Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials
Q24245576Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials
Q33329705Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies
Q58856139Reliability of Chalmers' Scale to Assess Quality in Meta-Analyses on Pharmacological Treatments for Osteoporosis
Q48461246Reporting of methods was better in the Clinical Trials Registry-India than in Indian journal publications
Q42974139Risk of bias: a simulation study of power to detect study-level moderator effects in meta-analysis.
Q73108450Scientific quality of clinical research. An analysis of 40 research projects in pharmacology/pharmacotherapy
Q35153764Simplified meta-analysis of clinical trials in resuscitation
Q34483754Spinal manipulation: current state of research and its indications
Q26864624Statins and the risk of colorectal cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 40 studies
Q38110580The Effectiveness of Coxiella burnetii Vaccines in Occupationally Exposed Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
Q34299666The art of quality assessment of RCTs included in systematic reviews
Q35500919The effect of platelet concentrates on graft maturation and graft-bone interface healing in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in human patients: a systematic review of controlled trials
Q38141169The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration
Q35207923The importance of psychological and social factors in influencing the uptake and maintenance of physical activity after stroke: a structured review of the empirical literature.
Q39227462The relationship between study design, results, and reporting of randomized clinical trials of HIV infection
Q33850625The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials
Q42020375The use of confidence intervals in reporting orthopaedic research findings
Q24235977Transarterial (chemo)embolisation for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
Q38206111Transarterial (chemo)embolization for curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analyses
Q37873302Treating Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears in Skeletally Immature Patients
Q38109995Treating Patella Instability in Skeletally Immature Patients
Q41889049Trial sample size, but not trial quality, is associated with positive study outcome
Q42381182Unbiased research and the human spirit: the challenges of randomized controlled trials
Q26776466Updated clinical evidence of Chinese herbal medicine for insomnia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Q36024705Use of statins and risk of haematological malignancies: a meta-analysis of six randomized clinical trials and eight observational studies
Q42285483User's guide to the orthopaedic literature: how to use an article about a randomized trial?
Q34762592Validation of an index of the quality of review articles
Q33728778Which guidelines can we trust?: Assessing strength of evidence behind recommendations for clinical practice

Search more.