| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P356 | DOI | 10.2105/AJPH.79.4.445 |
| P698 | PubMed publication ID | 2648871 |
| P2093 | author name string | R E Park | |
| K L Kahn | |||
| D H Solomon | |||
| J Kosecoff | |||
| M R Chassin | |||
| R H Brook | |||
| A Fink | |||
| N J Merrick | |||
| P2860 | cites work | How coronary angiography is used. Clinical determinants of appropriateness | Q34173759 |
| Obtaining clinical data on the appropriateness of medical care in community practice | Q36447235 | ||
| Does inappropriate use explain geographic variations in the use of health care services? A study of three procedures | Q39674968 | ||
| The paradox of appropriate care | Q39784223 | ||
| Physician ratings of appropriate indications for six medical and surgical procedures | Q68882014 | ||
| Practice variations: a challenge for physicians | Q69427352 | ||
| P433 | issue | 4 | |
| P304 | page(s) | 445-447 | |
| P577 | publication date | 1989-04-01 | |
| P1433 | published in | American Journal of Public Health | Q4744266 |
| P1476 | title | Physician ratings of appropriate indications for three procedures: theoretical indications vs indications used in practice | |
| P478 | volume | 79 |
| Q35190555 | Access to coronary catheterisation: fair shares for all? |
| Q35527911 | An experimental study of determinants of the extent of disagreement within clinical guideline development groups. |
| Q37633422 | Appropriate management of common bile duct stones: a RAND Corporation/UCLA Appropriateness Method statistical analysis. |
| Q30492307 | Appropriateness of indications for diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: association with relevant endoscopic disease |
| Q36817931 | Are the economically active more deserving? |
| Q92357739 | Clinical Scenarios for Which Spinal Mobilization and Manipulation Are Considered by an Expert Panel to be Inappropriate (and Appropriate) for Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain |
| Q40500574 | Clinical practice guidelines: from methodological to practical issues. |
| Q73512487 | Comment: evaluating the effectiveness of hospital care |
| Q41724503 | Consensus among experts and research synthesis. A comparison of methods |
| Q33384750 | Consensus methods: review of original methods and their main alternatives used in public health |
| Q25256783 | Development of appropriateness explicit criteria for cataract extraction by phacoemulsification |
| Q34123270 | Evaluation of explicit criteria for total hip joint replacement. |
| Q33334905 | Evidence-based medicine. Interpreting studies and setting policy |
| Q53645232 | Grey zones of clinical practice: some limits to evidence-based medicine. |
| Q36849451 | Improved patient care using the A/S/G/E guidelines on quality assurance: a prospective comparative study |
| Q72603780 | Medical technology assessment and practice guidelines: their day in court |
| Q33350198 | New initiatives in health services research: can the pieces of the health-care puzzle be put together? |
| Q34370350 | Outcome measures for primary health care: what are the research priorities? |
| Q33718005 | Patient Outcomes Research Teams and the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research |
| Q80396256 | Quality of care for women undergoing a hysterectomy: effects of insurance and race/ethnicity |
| Q47097484 | REDOSER project: optimising biological therapy dose for rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis patients |
| Q68059224 | Screening recommendations for the elderly |
| Q28290500 | What's the evidence that NICE guidance has been implemented? Results from a national evaluation using time series analysis, audit of patients' notes, and interviews |
Search more.