Is obstetrics safe in small hospitals? Evidence from New Zealand's regionalised perinatal system

scientific article published on 01 August 1985

Is obstetrics safe in small hospitals? Evidence from New Zealand's regionalised perinatal system is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1016/S0140-6736(85)92747-3
P698PubMed publication ID2863454

P2093author name stringR A Rosenblatt
J Reinken
P Shoemack
P2860cites workDo general practitioner deliveries constitute a perinatal mortality risk?Q34748100
A review of perinatal mortality in Colorado, 1971 to 1978, and its relationship to the regionalization of perinatal servicesQ40356994
Provider continuity and quality of medical care. A retrospective analysis of prenatal and perinatal outcomeQ41439262
Identifying the sources of the recent decline in perinatal mortality rates in California.Q45973121
Regional variations in perinatal mortality in New Zealand and their significanceQ46395998
A comparison of low-risk pregnant women booked for delivery in two systems of care: shared-care (consultant) and integrated general practice unit. I. Obstetrical procedures and neonatal outcomeQ63616158
Regionalization of OperationsQ66966091
The regionalization of perinatal careQ70782968
Impact of a regional infant dispatch center on neonatal mortalityQ70782978
Analysis of interrupted time series mortality trends: an example to evaluate regionalized perinatal careQ70858438
Neonatal mortality: an analysis of the recent improvement in the United StatesQ71128707
Volume, quality, and the regionalization of health care servicesQ71279311
Sounding board. The numbers game, or is small beautiful?Q71447111
Assessing the effectiveness of neonatal intensive careQ71447357
P433issue8452
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P304page(s)429-432
P577publication date1985-08-01
P1433published inThe LancetQ939416
P1476titleIs obstetrics safe in small hospitals? Evidence from New Zealand's regionalised perinatal system
P478volume2