| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P356 | DOI | 10.1111/J.1539-6924.2009.01337.X |
| P698 | PubMed publication ID | 20030766 |
| P50 | author | Marissa F. McBride | Q54965088 |
| Louisa Flander | Q55688708 | ||
| Fiona Fidler | Q64878703 | ||
| Mark Burgman | Q6766929 | ||
| P2093 | author name string | Geoff Cumming | |
| Andrew Speirs-Bridge | |||
| P433 | issue | 3 | |
| P304 | page(s) | 512-523 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2009-12-17 | |
| P1433 | published in | Risk Analysis | Q7336230 |
| P1476 | title | Reducing overconfidence in the interval judgments of experts | |
| P478 | volume | 30 |
| Q40723853 | A Model to Inform Management Actions as a Response to Chytridiomycosis-Associated Decline |
| Q46395453 | A Risk-Based Ecohydrological Approach to Assessing Environmental Flow Regimes |
| Q27311105 | A structured elicitation method to identify key direct risk factors for the management of natural resources |
| Q30987908 | Assessing the Effectiveness of Local Management of Coral Reefs Using Expert Opinion and Spatial Bayesian Modeling |
| Q40039719 | Assessing the Risk of a Canine Rabies Incursion in Northern Australia |
| Q52679479 | Assessing the probability of introduction and spread of avian influenza (AI) virus in commercial Australian poultry operations using an expert opinion elicitation. |
| Q92718528 | Building a stakeholder-led common vision increases the expected cost-effectiveness of biodiversity conservation |
| Q30399316 | Characterising Uncertainty in Expert Assessments: Encoding Heavily Skewed Judgements |
| Q28650755 | Contending with uncertainty in conservation management decisions |
| Q55498010 | Eliciting improved quantitative judgements using the IDEA protocol: A case study in natural resource management. |
| Q33574280 | Evaluation of harvest and information needs for North American sea ducks |
| Q33988157 | Expert status and performance |
| Q38646662 | Group elicitations yield more consistent, yet more uncertain experts in understanding risks to ecosystem services in New Zealand bays. |
| Q97067285 | Individuals vs. BARD: Experimental Evaluation of an Online System for Structured, Collaborative Bayesian Reasoning |
| Q38370467 | Informing Environmental Water Management Decisions: Using Conditional Probability Networks to Address the Information Needs of Planning and Implementation Cycles |
| Q33638014 | Modelling seasonal habitat suitability for wide-ranging species: Invasive wild pigs in northern Australia |
| Q62176573 | Participatory Modeling and Structured Decision Making |
| Q37337361 | Perceived versus predicted risks of colorectal cancer and self-reported colonoscopies by members of mismatch repair gene mutation-carrying families who have declined genetic testing |
| Q56417751 | Policy advice: Use experts wisely |
| Q43924566 | Purpose, Processes, Partnerships, and Products: 4Ps to advance Participatory Socio-Environmental Modeling |
| Q92509362 | Quantifying the impact of uncertainty on threat management for biodiversity |
| Q31030636 | Raising the bar for systematic conservation planning. |
| Q104282924 | Ranking buffel: Comparative risk and mitigation costs of key environmental and socio-cultural threats in central Australia |
| Q36715453 | Risk Associated with the Release of Wolbachia-Infected Aedes aegypti Mosquitoes into the Environment in an Effort to Control Dengue |
| Q62176589 | State-and-Transition Models: Conceptual Versus Simulation Perspectives, Usefulness and Breadth of Use, and Land Management Applications |
| Q39144847 | Stochastic population forecasting based on combinations of expert evaluations within the Bayesian paradigm |
| Q39292938 | The anchoring bias reflects rational use of cognitive resources |
| Q36264681 | Two-step adaptive management for choosing between two management actions |
| Q92873146 | Weighting and aggregating expert ecological judgments |
| Q111946155 | What we don't know and haven't learned about cost - benefit prioritisation of rock-wallaby management |
Search more.