Analysis of index modulation of doppler microembolic signals part II: in vitro discrimination

scientific article published on 01 January 2011

Analysis of index modulation of doppler microembolic signals part II: in vitro discrimination is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1016/J.ULTRASMEDBIO.2010.10.014
P698PubMed publication ID21144961

P50authorSébastien MénigotQ51295583
Jean-Marc GiraultQ73830897
P2093author name stringFrancesco Guidi
Jean-Pierre Remenieras
Denis Kouamé
Grégrory Souchon
P2860cites workThe effects of temporal bone on transcranial Doppler ultrasound beam shapeQ40773203
The matching pursuit: a new method of characterizing microembolic signals?Q47587271
The effect of velocity on the appearance of embolic signals studied in transcranial Doppler modelsQ48136047
Acoustical properties of the human skullQ48191136
Temporal analysis of tissue displacement induced by a transient ultrasound radiation forceQ50249892
Simulation of shear wave propagation in a soft medium using a pseudospectral time domain method.Q51786506
Differentiation between gaseous and formed embolic materials in vivo. Application in prosthetic heart valve patients.Q52373467
Differentiation between different pathological cerebral embolic materials using transcranial Doppler in an in vitro modelQ70525633
Sizing emboli in blood using pulse Doppler ultrasound--II: Effects of beam refractionQ71953827
Analysis of the frequency modulation present in Doppler ultrasound signals may allow differentiation between particulate and gaseous cerebral emboliQ73579118
Embolus differentiation using multifrequency transcranial DopplerQ83854504
P433issue1
P304page(s)102-111
P577publication date2011-01-01
P1433published inUltrasound in Medicine and BiologyQ2260380
P1476titleAnalysis of index modulation of doppler microembolic signals part II: in vitro discrimination
P478volume37

Reverse relations

Q30427309An in vitro comparison of embolus differentiation techniques for clinically significant macroemboli: dual-frequency technique versus frequency modulation method.cites workP2860