| P50 | author | Dirk De Ridder | Q42869238 |
| | Jan Deprest | Q43375040 |
| P2093 | author name string | Yves Ozog | |
| | Maja L Konstantinovic | |
| | Erika Werbrouck | |
| | Mazza Edoardo | |
| P2860 | cites work | The lightweight and large porous mesh concept for hernia repair. | Q30351837 |
| | Long-term outcome of abdominal sacrocolpopexy using xenograft compared with synthetic mesh | Q33237774 |
| | Demonstration of all connective tissue elements in a single section; pentachrome stains. | Q34237133 |
| | Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: a short version Cochrane review | Q34586225 |
| | The argument for lightweight polypropylene mesh in hernia repair | Q36104506 |
| | Efficacy and safety of using mesh or grafts in surgery for anterior and/or posterior vaginal wall prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis | Q37247806 |
| | Efficacy and safety of transvaginal mesh kits in the treatment of prolapse of the vaginal apex: a systematic review | Q37352101 |
| | Tissue mechanics, animal models, and pelvic organ prolapse: a review | Q37414727 |
| | Medium term outcome of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with xenografts compared to synthetic grafts | Q43530079 |
| | New polymer for intra-abdominal meshes--PVDF copolymer. | Q46628091 |
| | Impact of polymer pore size on the interface scar formation in a rat model | Q47189473 |
| | Impact of sacral colpopexy on in vivo vaginal biomechanical properties | Q47252078 |
| | Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: anatomic outcomes and complications with Pelvicol, autologous and synthetic graft materials | Q47731297 |
| | Differences in polypropylene shrinkage depending on mesh position in an experimental study. | Q51044505 |
| | Influence of the structure of new generation prostheses on shrinkage after implant in the abdominal wall. | Q51245859 |
| | Influence of polyglecaprone 25 (Monocryl) supplementation on the biocompatibility of a polypropylene mesh for hernia repair. | Q51542094 |
| | Shrinking of polypropylene mesh in vivo: an experimental study in dogs | Q74462622 |
| | Mesh erosion after abdominal sacrocolpopexy | Q77639301 |
| | Tensile strength and host response towards different polypropylene implant materials used for augmentation of fascial repair in a rat model | Q79217649 |
| | Biomechanical properties of vaginal tissue: preliminary results | Q80478805 |
| | Correlation between vaginal stiffness index and pelvic floor disorder quality-of-life scales | Q80543414 |
| | Systemic and vaginal biomechanical properties of women with normal vaginal support and pelvic organ prolapse | Q80774694 |
| | Review of synthetic mesh-related complications in pelvic floor reconstructive surgery | Q81944253 |
| | Experimental comparison of abdominal wall repair using different methods of enhancement by small intestinal submucosa graft | Q83179088 |
| | Experimental biomechanical evaluation of polypropylene prostheses used in pelvic organ prolapse surgery | Q83364153 |
| | The biology behind fascial defects and the use of implants in pelvic organ prolapse repair | Q83888423 |
| | Tensile properties of commonly used prolapse meshes | Q83994742 |
| | Biomechanical findings in rats undergoing fascial reconstruction with graft materials suggested as an alternative to polypropylene | Q84256556 |
| P433 | issue | 9 | |
| P304 | page(s) | 1099-1108 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2011-05-12 | |
| P1433 | published in | International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction | Q15762178 |
| P1476 | title | Shrinkage and biomechanical evaluation of lightweight synthetics in a rabbit model for primary fascial repair | |
| P478 | volume | 22 | |