Should Assessment of Quality Indicator of Colonoscopy Be Varied Depending on the Colonoscopic Technique Level?

scientific article published on 17 November 2015

Should Assessment of Quality Indicator of Colonoscopy Be Varied Depending on the Colonoscopic Technique Level? is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P6179Dimensions Publication ID1047274556
P356DOI10.1007/S10620-015-3954-8
P698PubMed publication ID26576553

P2093author name stringSang Wook Kim
Soo Teik Lee
In Hee Kim
Seong Hun Kim
Seung Ok Lee
Seung Young Seo
Bum Su Choung
Kyung Bo Yoo
P2860cites workEfficacy in standard clinical practice of colonoscopic polypectomy in reducing colorectal cancer incidenceQ34254859
Quality indicators for colonoscopyQ34517049
Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study WorkgroupQ34728738
Colonoscopy withdrawal times and adenoma detection rates.Q34996702
The Miss Rate for Colorectal Adenoma Determined by Quality-Adjusted, Back-to-Back ColonoscopiesQ35778341
Missed adenomas during colonoscopic surveillance in individuals with Lynch Syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer).Q37163626
The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented researchQ37392109
Withdrawal times and associated factors in colonoscopy: a quality assurance multicenter assessmentQ37625770
Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: new concepts are needed to study research participation effectsQ37671448
Prevention of interval colorectal cancers: what every clinician needs to knowQ38103678
Does colonoscopic polypectomy reduce the incidence of colorectal carcinoma?Q40660811
Quantification of the Hawthorne effect in hand hygiene compliance monitoring using an electronic monitoring system: a retrospective cohort studyQ43049578
Colonoscopy quality measures: experience from the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening ProgrammeQ43558391
Colonoscopy quality assessment in a mass population screening programme based on faecal occult blood test.Q44556441
Effect of a time-dependent colonoscopic withdrawal protocol on adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy.Q45898123
A Hawthorne strategy: implications for performance measurement and improvement.Q51089908
[Quality assurance in coloscopy in private practice and the hospital. The Gastroenterology Quality Circle (GEQC) Munich]Q52200228
European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition--Quality assurance in endoscopy in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis.Q53122876
Impact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield: implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal timeQ61989972
Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopiesQ71933829
Quality assurance and colonoscopyQ73113121
The colonoscopic miss rate and true one-year recurrence of colorectal neoplastic polyps. Polyp Prevention Study GroupQ77957959
Variation in colonoscopic technique and adenoma detection rates at an academic gastroenterology unitQ83209561
Formal documentation of withdrawal time improves the quality of colonoscopic observationQ84736091
P433issue3
P921main subjectcolonoscopyQ840387
P304page(s)731-736
P577publication date2015-11-17
P1433published inDigestive Diseases and SciencesQ15716711
P1476titleShould Assessment of Quality Indicator of Colonoscopy Be Varied Depending on the Colonoscopic Technique Level?
P478volume61

Reverse relations

Q51762859Systematic Review: Gut Microbiota in Fecal Samples and Detection of Colorectal Neoplasms.cites workP2860

Search more.