Stroke: Are care and outcomes better for participants of stroke trials?

scientific article published on 01 August 2016

Stroke: Are care and outcomes better for participants of stroke trials? is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1038/NRNEUROL.2016.123
P698PubMed publication ID27562652

P50authorMary J MacleodQ57161970
P2093author name stringCarl E Counsell
P2860cites workOutcomes of patients who participate in randomized controlled trials compared to similar patients receiving similar interventions who do not participateQ24242288
High-dose albumin treatment for acute ischaemic stroke (ALIAS) Part 2: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, placebo-controlled trialQ30572344
Medical management with or without interventional therapy for unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations (ARUBA): a multicentre, non-blinded, randomised trialQ33993905
False hopes and best data: consent to research and the therapeutic misconceptionQ34172812
Outcomes for patients with the same disease treated inside and outside of randomized trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Q34435947
Role of decompressive hemicraniectomy in extensive middle cerebral artery strokes: a meta-analysis of randomised trialsQ35561853
Improved in-hospital outcomes and care for patients in stroke research: An observational studyQ37082961
Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: new concepts are needed to study research participation effectsQ37671448
P433issue9
P304page(s)498-499
P577publication date2016-08-01
P1433published inNature Reviews NeurologyQ2079285
P1476titleStroke: Are care and outcomes better for participants of stroke trials?
P478volume12

Reverse relations

Q51827389Observational studies and the chicken and egg issue in stroke.cites workP2860

Search more.