| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P2093 | author name string | Edo Kaluski | |
| Muhammad U Khan | |||
| Muhammad Z Khan | |||
| Swapna Talluri | |||
| Safi U Khan | |||
| Ahmad N Lone | |||
| P2860 | cites work | Predicting the extent of heterogeneity in meta-analysis, using empirical data from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews | Q24289190 |
| The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials | Q27860509 | ||
| Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement | Q27860868 | ||
| Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis | Q28075686 | ||
| Part 1: Executive Summary: 2015 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations | Q28087512 | ||
| Manual chest compression vs use of an automated chest compression device during resuscitation following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomized trial | Q33996775 | ||
| Global incidences of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and survival rates: Systematic review of 67 prospective studies | Q34137046 | ||
| Manual vs. integrated automatic load-distributing band CPR with equal survival after out of hospital cardiac arrest. The randomized CIRC trial | Q34410782 | ||
| Mechanical versus manual chest compression for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC): a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial | Q34451687 | ||
| Modelling heterogeneity variances in multiple treatment comparison meta-analysis--are informative priors the better solution? | Q34545549 | ||
| Manual Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Versus CPR Including a Mechanical Chest Compression Device in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Comprehensive Meta-analysis From Randomized and Observational Studies | Q35852951 | ||
| Bayesian methods for evidence synthesis in cost-effectiveness analysis | Q36381197 | ||
| Chest compression fraction determines survival in patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation | Q37482595 | ||
| Mechanical chest compressions and simultaneous defibrillation vs conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the LINC randomized trial | Q38441192 | ||
| Part 6: Alternative Techniques and Ancillary Devices for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care | Q38608799 | ||
| European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 4. Cardiac arrest in special circumstances | Q41951471 | ||
| Evidence synthesis for decision making 4: inconsistency in networks of evidence based on randomized controlled trials | Q43102818 | ||
| Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial | Q44735204 | ||
| A pilot study of mechanical chest compressions with the LUCAS™ device in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. | Q46172268 | ||
| European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 2. Adult basic life support and automated external defibrillation | Q47637635 | ||
| Clinical consequences of the introduction of mechanical chest compression in the EMS system for treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest-a pilot study. | Q51138546 | ||
| Safety of mechanical chest compression devices AutoPulse and LUCAS in cardiac arrest: a randomized clinical trial for non-inferiority. | Q55332422 | ||
| P921 | main subject | cardiac arrest | Q202837 |
| P304 | page(s) | 182-188 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2018-05-07 | |
| P1433 | published in | Resuscitation | Q15753095 |
| P1476 | title | Efficacy and safety of mechanical versus manual compression in cardiac arrest - A Bayesian network meta-analysis | |
| P478 | volume | 130 |
Search more.